Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
Are vertical J-Pole VHF antennas (essentially) omni directional in coverage ? Thanks |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 17, 9:46 am, "Robert11" wrote:
Hello, Are vertical J-Pole VHF antennas (essentially) omni directional in coverage ? Thanks Yes it is omnidirectional. This antenna is merely a 1/2 vertical end- fed with a 1/4 wave matching stub. Frank K3YAZ Tucson |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 17, 11:54 pm, RHF wrote:
On Jun 17, 11:54 am, wrote: In article .com, " wrote: On Jun 17, 9:46 am, "Robert11" wrote: Hello, Are vertical J-Pole VHF antennas (essentially) omni directional in coverage ? Thanks - - Yes it is omnidirectional. - - This antenna is merely a 1/2 vertical end-fed - - with a 1/4 wave matching stub. - - It's not a good broadband antenna for SWL. - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California WHY ? ~ RHF . . . . Because it uses a 1/4 wave matching stub section to transform the low impedance coax input to the high impedance of an end-fed halfwave ("Zepp") at around 5K ohms. Because a 1/4 wave section is only a quarter-wave at a narrow band of frequencies, the impedance match gets poor too far from the design frequency (although I think odd harmonics work find, so 3/4 or (2n+1)/4 wave all work exactly the same. But that's a comparatively small percentage of total frequencies, so it's somewhat of a narrow-band antenna. As far as the radiation pattern, it is omni-directional in the horizontal plane if it's used vertically. The energy is somewhat "squashed donut" so there is some gain toward lower angles of radiation vs. higher angles. It's a fairly OK antenna where moderate gain and a relatively narrow band of frequencies are acceptable. Hope this helps. -- ross |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 19, 1:33 am, Ross Archer wrote:
On Jun 17, 11:54 pm, RHF wrote: On Jun 17, 11:54 am, wrote: In article .com, " wrote: On Jun 17, 9:46 am, "Robert11" wrote: Hello, Are vertical J-Pole VHF antennas (essentially) omni directional in coverage ? Thanks - - Yes it is omnidirectional. - - This antenna is merely a 1/2 vertical end-fed - - with a 1/4 wave matching stub. - - It's not a good broadband antenna for SWL. - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California WHY ? ~ RHF . . . . Because it uses a 1/4 wave matching stub section to transform the low impedance coax input to the high impedance of an end-fed halfwave ("Zepp") at around 5K ohms. Because a 1/4 wave section is only a quarter-wave at a narrow band of frequencies, the impedance match gets poor too far from the design frequency (although I think odd harmonics work find, so 3/4 or (2n+1)/4 wave all work exactly the same. But that's a comparatively small percentage of total frequencies, so it's somewhat of a narrow-band antenna. As far as the radiation pattern, it is omni-directional in the horizontal plane if it's used vertically. The energy is somewhat "squashed donut" so there is some gain toward lower angles of radiation vs. higher angles. It's a fairly OK antenna where moderate gain and a relatively narrow band of frequencies are acceptable. Hope this helps. -- ross- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - RA - TYVM for the Explanation ~ RHF |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert11" wrote in message ... Hello, Are vertical J-Pole VHF antennas (essentially) omni directional in coverage ? No. A J-Pole is not an isotropic radiator. It is "omnidirectional" only if you consider signals that intersect the antenna in the plane that is at a right angle to the major axis of the antenna. The closer you get to having the signal intersect the antenna at the end the the less sensitive the antenna is. i.e. it is less sensitive to transmissions that are from below or above the antenna. You will get an idea of the plot the antenna's free space pattern if you imagine an orange with two major parabolic dimples 180 degrees apart, the centers of which are in line with the major axis of the antenna. In practice the antenna is considered an omni because they are mounted vertically to communicate over the surface of the earth with other radio units on the surface of the earth .In day to day operations the surface of the earth is very close to the geometric defintion of a plane. Dan AI8O |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
J pole question | Antenna | |||
QUESTION: Roach/Squid Pole Antenna for 10, 20 and 40m? | Antenna | |||
Alternate material j pole construction question. | Antenna | |||
ladder line J-pole question | Antenna | |||
2 meter tv twin (300ohm) J pole question | Antenna |