Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Tommy Tootles wrote: Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. Like Father, Like Daughters! dxAce wrote: They been busted for coke? Has George? I think not! Then you'd be wrong yet again, Dusty. Nowhere did I say they were "busted". However... ... Holland, Michigan must be more of a redneck, hick backwater than I suspected. The following items have been reported *numerous* times in both the the print and broadcast media (which apparently don't make it to Holland): 1) The daughters have had *numerous* drug, sex and alcohol escapades. 2) George W was (is?) a *SELF-ADMITTED* abuser of alcohol and weaseled when asked about cocaine (rather than giving a simple "no"). 3) "Dime-Bag" Laura? Don't worry about the print media (I know you are fighting that comprehension problem), but when listening to the news, please try and pay attention. Aw come on, Tommy, get mommy to explain it to you. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:49:28 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:20:31 -0400, dxAce wrote: Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. They been busted for coke? Has George? When Bush/43 was asked about his cocaine use he refused to answer the question. If he couldn't say "no" that leaves only one alternative. By that logic, if he couldn't say 'yes' that leaves only one alternative as well. Since he was running for president on a conservative ticket, his two choices were either "no" or to simply not answer, if "no" would not have been truthful. I don't think he could have done what Obama has done, admit to taking cocaine and then set a record in presidential fund raising. We Democrats get all the fun :-) You're in Fantasy Land. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have never been to Michigan before.But I know Michigan is a Great
State.During World War Two, Michigan built all kinds of things for our U.S.Military and many many people from Michigan served their Country proudly, just as they are doing now in the War on Terror.There was a guy by the last name of Wotring in our unit in Vietnam in 1964.I think he once said he is from the Detroit area.America would have had a hard time winning World War Two if it haden't been for Michigan, and all of the other U.S.States. cuhulin |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Miller wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:49:28 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:20:31 -0400, dxAce wrote: Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. They been busted for coke? Has George? When Bush/43 was asked about his cocaine use he refused to answer the question. If he couldn't say "no" that leaves only one alternative. By that logic, if he couldn't say 'yes' that leaves only one alternative as well. Since he was running for president on a conservative ticket, his two choices were either "no" or to simply not answer, if "no" would not have been truthful. You missed my point. Either answer would have diverted attention from his policies on the campaign trail. "Yes" would have sparked ceaseless wrangling. And "No" would have sparked ceaseless wrangling. If he'd done cocaine, and admitted it, there would have been a couple of his snorting buddies trotted out who'd have testified they snorted with him, and then there would have been the entire, 'what did he snort and when did he snort it' questions anywhere he went. All the talking heads would have been on it. It would have become an albatross on the campaign trail. If he'd not done cocaine, and denied it, as evidenced by the lengths to which the opposition went in the military discharge story (ie, abject dismissal of Bush's senior and commanding officers who asserted he had completed his service with distinction, and falsification of documents asserting otherwise), there would have been a couple of people who would have been brought forward and testified that he did, in fact, use cocaine, followed by allegations he was high in the military, while in flight, during his tenure as Governor, etc, etc...and now he's got a REAL problem. And make no mistake, this was in the works. Two of his college classmates admitted to being paid by sources unrevealed to make these charges when the time came. It didn't, and they didn't, and though the story didn't die, it didn't become a liability, either. But the tools were in place to make it so should he eventually respond. Al Franken, on Letterman, told of an encounter with Bush where he tried to trick Bush into admitting he'd used amphetamines to get though finals week in college. And Bush failed to respond to that, too. Which surprised Franken..because if he responded to that question about amphetamines, why would he not then comment when asked about cocaine. Franken said, and this is a quote, "He outsmarted me. He just outsmarted me. He took away anything that could have been asserted after that." So, to not answer simply removed potential obstacles far greater than the nagging suspicions left in the wake of an unanswered question. Because if he had addressed the question, he'd have been screwed either way. This was a strictly political maneuver. On both sides. And it was very well played to a stalemate. So, in response to your remark...."Since he was running for president on a conservative ticket, his two choices were either "no" or to simply not answer, if "no" would no have been truthful," is inaccurate. He had only one choice....a non answer. Because to respond either way would have been disastrous. Leaving the implication that he didn't say 'no' because it would have been untruthful as the only thing left to complete the mission of the person who asked the question in the first place: To implicate the candidate by his own words whether they were spoken or not. It's a twist on the classic 'have you stopped beating your wife' scenario....there isn't a response leads to anything but an indictment. Becasue of the politics, the only thing that can be concluded by Bush's failure to respond with either a 'no' or a 'yes' is that the question remains unanswered. Anybody in politics knows why. The public, only wishing for an indictment of his character, is left to draw a conclusion that is implied by the questioner, but not by the candidate. Again, excellently played. And without a single fact, without a single accusation, affirmation or denial. Typical big-time politics. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 5, 5:20 am, dxAce wrote:
Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. They been busted for coke? Has George? I think not! But Al Gore's son certainly has been caught with drugs! Calm down little Liberal Boy... have mommy explain it to you. Actually Found with Four Separate Drugs : MJ and 3-Scrips without and RX. TT, The young man clearly has a real medical problem -and- needs help - i am a compassionate conservative. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compassionate_conservatism ~ RHF |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RHF wrote:
The young man clearly has a real medical problem -and- needs help - i am a compassionate conservative. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compassionate_conservatism http://tinyurl.com/2nhznn |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
In article , dxAce wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Al will be coming out with a NEW book soon: An Inconvenient Son Good one. This is better... http://www.danerd.com/media/183_geor...ick+nose+funny mike |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Well, maybe so...but then please explain the Jeb Bush's son being arrested for public intoxication and the Bush twins alcohol, drug and sex escapades. Are you saying they've gone Democratic??? P.S. Thanks again for the on-topic short wave post, you two-faced hypocrite. P.P.S. I realize you probably won't see this because you are perpetually hiding behind your mommy's skirt, otherwise known as your cowardly plonks... |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 5, 6:48 pm, Telamon
wrote: In article , Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:49:28 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:20:31 -0400, dxAce wrote: Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. They been busted for coke? Has George? When Bush/43 was asked about his cocaine use he refused to answer the question. If he couldn't say "no" that leaves only one alternative. By that logic, if he couldn't say 'yes' that leaves only one alternative as well. Since he was running for president on a conservative ticket, his two choices were either "no" or to simply not answer, if "no" would not have been truthful. I don't think he could have done what Obama has done, admit to taking cocaine and then set a record in presidential fund raising. We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". -- Telamon Ventura, California- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Telamon Re-write : No, Democrats & Liberals are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 6, 4:25 am, Tel-a-Dip wrote:
Telamon wrote: No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Well, maybe so...but then please explain the Jeb Bush's son being arrested for public intoxication and the Bush twins alcohol, drug and sex escapades. Are you saying they've gone Democratic??? P.S. Thanks again for the on-topic short wave post, you two-faced hypocrite. P.P.S. I realize you probably won't see this because you are perpetually hiding behind your mommy's skirt, otherwise known as your cowardly plonks... Tel-A-Dip - Well 'you' are no Telamon -but- Clearly "You" Are A 'Dip' ! ~ RHF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Confused with BF998 | Homebrew | |||
Confused on diplexer issue. | Homebrew | |||
I am confused about this auction | Shortwave | |||
Balun's... I'm confused... | Antenna |