On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:22:18 -0400, dxAce
wrote:



Bob Miller wrote:

On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:49:28 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

Bob Miller wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:20:31 -0400, dxAce
wrote:


Tommy Tootard wrote:

dxAce wrote:
Al Gore's son arrested (yet again):

http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html

Like Father, Like Son!
Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters.
They been busted for coke? Has George?

When Bush/43 was asked about his cocaine use he refused to answer the
question. If he couldn't say "no" that leaves only one alternative.


By that logic, if he couldn't say 'yes' that leaves only one
alternative as well.

Since he was running for president on a conservative ticket, his two
choices were either "no" or to simply not answer, if "no" would not
have been truthful.

I don't think he could have done what Obama has done, admit to taking
cocaine and then set a record in presidential fund raising.

The ability to raise funds does not necessarily equate to the ability to
actually be President and handle the job. Obama lacks basic skills, which should
be painfully obvious even to the most jaded Liberal.


It remains to be seen whether Obama will reach the golden level, but
when it comes to experience, who had more than our current esteemed
Veep who appears to gone totally kookoo lately?

Right now I'm looking for good judgement and truthfulness in a
candidate, which is enough to disqualify just about everyone :-)

bob
k5qwg

On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:48:10 -0700, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
Bob Miller wrote:

On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:49:28 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

Bob Miller wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:20:31 -0400, dxAce
wrote:


Tommy Tootard wrote:

dxAce wrote:
Al Gore's son arrested (yet again):

http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html

Like Father, Like Son!
Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters.
They been busted for coke? Has George?

When Bush/43 was asked about his cocaine use he refused to answer the
question. If he couldn't say "no" that leaves only one alternative.


By that logic, if he couldn't say 'yes' that leaves only one
alternative as well.

Since he was running for president on a conservative ticket, his two
choices were either "no" or to simply not answer, if "no" would not
have been truthful.

I don't think he could have done what Obama has done, admit to taking
cocaine and then set a record in presidential fund raising.

We Democrats get all the fun :-)

No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is
"fun".

Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a
horse" what's the big deal?

bob
k5qwg

www.devilfinder.com Fair.org rush limbaugh The Way Things Aren't

rush limbaugh is a MORON.I once tried to listen to that MORON when he
first showed up on the air.I caught that MORON in so many LIES, after
about one month, I quit listening to that MORON.al gore is a MORON too.
cuhulin

On Jul 6, 11:01 pm, m II wrote:
RHF wrote:
Mike (M II) - My Compassionate Conservatism
even includes the Children of Conservatives.

Very nice. They need a lot of prayer.

http://tinyurl.com/2nhznn

mike

Mike (M II) - As Do You - Amen ~ RHF
- - - Hating America Is An Addiction :
Mike (M II) 'you' can Kick the Habit.

Dear God {Allah} Help this Can-A-Duh-Ian
to become a Born-Again-Canadian :
* To Love Canada - More Than He Hates America
* To Be Proud To Be A Canadian
* To Love Being A Canadian
* To Public Proclaim : I Am A Canadian
and we all say - amen, Amen and Amen !

RHF wrote:

Mike (M II) - As Do You - Amen ~ RHF
- - - Hating America Is An Addiction :
Mike (M II) 'you' can Kick the Habit.


How does showing pictures of Politician's drunken children make me an
American hater? Why did you not speak up when the drunk was a child of a
Democrat?

What you should be hating is the complete collection of low lifes on
both sides of the political spectrum who have made Representative
Democracy a complete joke...and not just in the States.


mike

Bob Miller wrote:


We Democrats get all the fun :-)
No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is
"fun".

Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a
horse" what's the big deal?


Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven.

Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal
of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be
proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name
can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party
must become a show for the media.

Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose
supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of
the neighborhood.

Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the
story than has to date been stated, or implied.

And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her
story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities.
Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that
he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature
of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact.

On Jul 7, 7:13 pm, m II wrote:
RHF wrote:
Mike (M II) - As Do You - Amen ~ RHF
- - - Hating America Is An Addiction :
Mike (M II) 'you' can Kick the Habit.

How does showing pictures of Politician's drunken children make me an
American hater? Why did you not speak up when the drunk was a child of a
Democrat?

- What you should be hating is the complete collection
- of low lifes on both sides of the political spectrum who
- have made Representative Democracy a complete joke
- ...and not just in the States.
-
- Miike

Mike (M II),

So you Admit that you post 'selected' Pictures
of American {Conservative} Politician's Children
{who happen to be drunk or on drugs} .

Would 'you' Dare to Post some Dirt on Canadian
Politicians and their Families and Children . . .
- - - Oops you can't because you would be locked
up in a Mental Ward in Canada for doing so.

Mike (M II) - That is Good - The First Step to Recovery
is to Admit that 'you' have a Problem.

Or does one has to wonder -if- posting the Pictures
of Politician's Children - GETS YOU OFF !

This IMHO put's 'you' one step away from
being into Child Pornography . . .
* Exploiting Innocent Children for Political Gain.
* Using Drug and Alcohol Problems of Others
as a Political Propaganda Tool.
* Victimizing Non-Politicians in a Political War.

Mike (M II) Get Help - Please ~ RHF

On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

Bob Miller wrote:


We Democrats get all the fun :-)
No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is
"fun".

Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a
horse" what's the big deal?


Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven.

Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal
of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be
proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name
can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party
must become a show for the media.

Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose
supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of
the neighborhood.

Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the
story than has to date been stated, or implied.

And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her
story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities.
Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that
he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature
of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact.


Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at
manufacture rather than fact, as per the Swift boatees & that "vast
right wing conspiracy" that followed the Clintons around for eight
years; I'm just waiting for them to get back in gear again... once we
decide on Hillary, Obama, Gore or whomever, the possiblities will be
rich with so much time to kill after super-duper Tuesday, early next
year.

bob
k5qwg

Bob Miller wrote:

On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

Bob Miller wrote:


We Democrats get all the fun :-)
No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is
"fun".

Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a
horse" what's the big deal?


Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven.

Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal
of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be
proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name
can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party
must become a show for the media.

Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose
supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of
the neighborhood.

Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the
story than has to date been stated, or implied.

And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her
story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities.
Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that
he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature
of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact.


Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at
manufacture rather than fact...

Hogwash!

dxAce wrote:

Bob Miller wrote:

On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

Bob Miller wrote:


We Democrats get all the fun :-)
No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is
"fun".

Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a
horse" what's the big deal?


Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven.

Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal
of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be
proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name
can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party
must become a show for the media.

Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose
supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of
the neighborhood.

Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the
story than has to date been stated, or implied.

And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her
story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities.
Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that
he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature
of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact.


Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at
manufacture rather than fact...

Hogwash!

The pre-eminent manufacturer and liar out there today is Al Gore! And you dweebs
fall for it!

Boggling.