Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I remember one time seeing on tv, (when IMPEACHED! klintoon was the
prez) the way gore was standing behind and just to the right of bill klintoon,,,, gore was looking at klintoon just as though gore was wanting to do a ''monica lewinsky'' on klintoon. cuhulin |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 10:38 am, Bob Miller wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a horse" what's the big deal? Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven. Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party must become a show for the media. Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of the neighborhood. Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the story than has to date been stated, or implied. And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities. Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact. Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at manufacture rather than fact, as per the Swift boatees & that "vast right wing conspiracy" that followed the Clintons around for eight years; I'm just waiting for them to get back in gear again... once we decide on Hillary, Obama, Gore or whomever, the possiblities will be rich with so much time to kill after super-duper Tuesday, early next year. bob k5qwg- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - (OT) : Why Did Hillary Marry Bill Clinton ? - I Was Drugged, Dazed And Confused ![]() Bob [K5QWG], With 250 Sworn "I Have No Recollection . . ." and "I Don't Recall" and Quotes to Hillary's Credit. A One-a-Week Radio and TV 30 Second Spot quoting Hillary in one of these many "I Don't Recall" Issues from the Convention to the Election should be a pretty good character smear champaign to slant the Voting Public's View of Her : Don't Elect Hillary - Recall Her ! - - - Paid for by the Sworn Truth About Hillary Committee the truth i swear by it - not at it ~ RHF |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 13:55:20 -0400, dxAce
wrote: dxAce wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a horse" what's the big deal? Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven. Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party must become a show for the media. Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of the neighborhood. Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the story than has to date been stated, or implied. And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities. Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact. Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at manufacture rather than fact... Hogwash! The pre-eminent manufacturer and liar out there today is Al Gore! And you dweebs fall for it! Boggling. You just proved my point. bob k5qwg |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Bob Miller wrote: On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 13:55:20 -0400, dxAce wrote: dxAce wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a horse" what's the big deal? Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven. Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party must become a show for the media. Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of the neighborhood. Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the story than has to date been stated, or implied. And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities. Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact. Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at manufacture rather than fact... Hogwash! The pre-eminent manufacturer and liar out there today is Al Gore! And you dweebs fall for it! Boggling. You just proved my point. Ha! |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I remember one time back in 1970 or 1971 when I was looking through a
Hemmings Motor News www.hemmingsmotornews.com and I saw an ad in there where a guy in Barn Gat Light, New York had an old T Model Ford car for sale.I own a 1914 T Model Runabout Roadster car that I bought for $1,800.00 cold hard cash in November of 1971 from Mr.and Mrs.Gary Peterson in Sioux Falls,South Dakota.Mrs.Peterson, she was a pretty blonde gal, they let me sleep on their couch that night.They was moving to Minnesota and they said they couldn't take the car with them.Of course, she took my money, just like Mrs.Clay Mason in Raymond,Mississippi www.devilfinder.com Raymond Mississippi (Raymond is eight miles Southwest of doggy's couch) took my $150.00 for my little doggy. www.cattledog.com www.acdca.org Yesuhhh,,, Mrs.Clay Mason is very pretty too. cuhulin |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Them wimmins always have their mitts out, now don't they?
cuhulin |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can Truthly say that old black and white stacylost ''phonograph''
french photograph ''dazzed'' me! cuhulin |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dxAce wrote:
Bob Miller wrote: On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a horse" what's the big deal? Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven. Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party must become a show for the media. Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of the neighborhood. Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the story than has to date been stated, or implied. And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities. Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact. Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at manufacture rather than fact... Hogwash! That sums up pretty much what comes out of a Repug's mouth. You, of course, being a stellar example. JB |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I never had sex with a Canadian girl before.I wonder what it's like?
Metinks there are some Canadians here in Jackson, lets me LQQK around. cuhulin |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Confused with BF998 | Homebrew | |||
Confused on diplexer issue. | Homebrew | |||
I am confused about this auction | Shortwave | |||
Balun's... I'm confused... | Antenna |