Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 5th 07, 05:21 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2007
Posts: 707
Default WSM-AM: Significant revenue from our sky-wave coverage !

On Sep 4, 10:16?pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article .com,





IBOCcrock wrote:
Well,


Even though its getting on in the evening, I'm not going to send
everyone to an early sleep with a lengthy dissertation as to why I
feel the way I do on this divisive but important subject. That has
been expressed many times by others more eloquently than I can. I
don't expect at this point to change anyone's mind on the subject;
conversely, I doubt any one will alter my
convictions either. The basic fact for us down here is for the past 82
years we have, and still, derive significant revenue from our sky-wave
coverage area and we are committed to protecting that tradition.


I do look forward to the discourse after September 14th when the
evidence and data is documented. I also look forward to working with
our coalition of broadcasters whether it is to find solutions or seek
damages.


Best regards,


Watt Hairston
WSM-AM, Grand Ole Opry, LLC.


What was that you were saying, Eduardo ?


That guy has no idea what he is talking about.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


That's quite a response, Telamon !

  #2   Report Post  
Old September 5th 07, 06:17 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default WSM-AM: Significant revenue from our sky-wave coverage !

In article om,
IBOCcrock wrote:

On Sep 4, 10:16?pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article .com,





IBOCcrock wrote:
Well,


Even though its getting on in the evening, I'm not going to send
everyone to an early sleep with a lengthy dissertation as to why I
feel the way I do on this divisive but important subject. That has
been expressed many times by others more eloquently than I can. I
don't expect at this point to change anyone's mind on the subject;
conversely, I doubt any one will alter my
convictions either. The basic fact for us down here is for the past 82
years we have, and still, derive significant revenue from our sky-wave
coverage area and we are committed to protecting that tradition.


I do look forward to the discourse after September 14th when the
evidence and data is documented. I also look forward to working with
our coalition of broadcasters whether it is to find solutions or seek
damages.


Best regards,


Watt Hairston
WSM-AM, Grand Ole Opry, LLC.


What was that you were saying, Eduardo ?


That guy has no idea what he is talking about.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


That's quite a response, Telamon !


Well, I guess we will have to wait until tomorrow for the paid shill
Eduardo to post on Usenet during working hours. He won't do it on his on
time.

Eduardo is full of crap using technical terms for broadcast coverage he
does not understand so what is his opinion worth... nothing!

Is that better?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #3   Report Post  
Old September 5th 07, 06:52 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,817
Default WSM-AM: Significant revenue from our sky-wave coverage !


"Telamon" wrote in message
...

Eduardo is full of crap using technical terms for broadcast coverage he
does not understand so what is his opinion worth... nothing!


AM filings at the FCC... for example, proofs of directional systems, have
readings expressed in mV/m, and they are kept consistent even if the
readings, such as on radials close to the array, are over 1000 mV/m. The
criteria for licensing, in fact, used to be that the station had to put a 25
mV/m signal over the city of license.


  #4   Report Post  
Old September 5th 07, 02:45 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,324
Default WSM-AM: Significant revenue from our sky-wave coverage !

On Sep 5, 12:52 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message

...



Eduardo is full of crap using technical terms for broadcast coverage he
does not understand so what is his opinion worth... nothing!


AM filings at the FCC... for example, proofs of directional systems, have
readings expressed in mV/m, and they are kept consistent even if the
readings, such as on radials close to the array, are over 1000 mV/m. The
criteria for licensing, in fact, used to be that the station had to put a 25
mV/m signal over the city of license.


1000 mV/m isn't going to woo back those young listeners...you know,
the ones whose numbers are thinning. You're in a pickle!

  #5   Report Post  
Old September 6th 07, 06:18 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default WSM-AM: Significant revenue from our sky-wave coverage !

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

Eduardo is full of crap using technical terms for broadcast coverage he
does not understand so what is his opinion worth... nothing!


AM filings at the FCC... for example, proofs of directional systems, have
readings expressed in mV/m, and they are kept consistent even if the
readings, such as on radials close to the array, are over 1000 mV/m. The
criteria for licensing, in fact, used to be that the station had to put a 25
mV/m signal over the city of license.


But you don't know what these number mean so how can you use them to
make a point?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WSM-AM: Significant revenue from our sky-wave coverage ! IBOCcrock Shortwave 0 September 5th 07 05:20 AM
SCYF now adds new technology, forecast $15 Million in Revenue pennywise_investor General 0 August 3rd 07 05:01 PM
"Clear Channel Radio Ad Revenue Slips" Mike Terry Broadcasting 1 October 31st 04 04:24 AM
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? WolfMan Antenna 9 October 10th 04 05:47 PM
Newbie ?: I've Built A Simple 1/4 Wave Dipole for 2 Mtrs. Could IMake a1/2 Wave? WolfMan Homebrew 4 September 29th 04 03:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017