Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 11th 07, 06:39 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
RHF RHF is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,652
Default HD Hypocrisy

On Sep 11, 6:14 am, Steve wrote:
On Sep 11, 1:31 am, wrote:





HD Radio is the ONLY solution I can come up with in order to listen to
ANY AM station in my city - even the very powerful signals - while in
my home office, where I spend a good deal of time. With dimmer
switches, electronic air cleaners, computer, etc. etc. the noise level
wipes out all signals. I have to go to another room in the house if I
want to listen to AM analog. HD Radio is a blessing for me.


With so many complaining about the interference it causes on analog
signals - someone please tell me which analog station(s) in the Fresno
area are getting this interference. I can't locate ANY analog station
with ANY interference when in a "quiet" room in my home, and there are
MANY HD stations broadcasting in Fresno. I use both the CCRadio and
the CCRadio-SW and just don't have that problem, or at least haven't
been able to identify it.


I understand some of the complaints, but the industry isn't concerned
with those who dx. In fact, I have the problem with television
signals. When I moved to the Fresno area from Sacramento, I paid
$1,000 for a large tv antenna installation so that I could pick up the
major stations from Sacramento, about 180 miles from me. Shortly
after paying $1,000, the low-powered stations started appearing all
over the dial and wiped out channels 3 and 13 from Sacramento, channel
12 from Santa Barbara, channel 8 from Salinas, etc. But that's life.
TV and Radio are for the masses, NOT just the few who dx as a hobby.
HDTV has solved the tv problem for me as now I get channels 3 and 13
on digital tv. HD Radio solves the problem I have with too much
electrical noise on AM.


No one really cares about the hobbiest. We are left out of the
picture when technology changes.


Here you go:

http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...m-details.asp?...

You'll be using this long after no one in this group can remember what
HD radio was.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


- http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...8249&CatId=197

Oxx Digital Wireless Internet Radio and Music Center
http://www.tigerdirect.com/include/A...1000&imgcart=1

Steve,

* Requires a Computer / WiFi Network

* Plus Monthly Costs for Internet Service

Real Radio is FREE ! ~ RHF
  #12   Report Post  
Old September 11th 07, 07:23 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 52
Default HD Hypocrisy

On Sep 11, 8:34 am, RHF wrote:

KGO-AM on 810 kHz makes it a point with their
Over-Night Talk-Radio Call-in Show to take Callers
from all over the West Coast from San Diego to Alaska.

Of course, but KGO does NOT want people living in San Francisco to be
listening to an out-of-town station. KMJ in Fresno also makes a point
of having listeners from all over the West Coast, but KMJ does NOT
want listeners IN Fresno to be listening to KGO or any other out-of-
town station. All the stations love people to be listening from out
of town, but NONE of the stations want people in their city to be
listening to out-of-town stations.

Same with TV. KGO-7 in San Francisco loved it when I told one of
their engineers that I was getting their signal in Clovis (Fresno).
They even offered to send me a gift (forgot what, but I think it was a
t-shirt) if I would tape it and send it to them. But do you think
KGO-7 would give someone in San Francisco a waiver so they could get
the KABC from Los Angeles on Dish Network?

It's a one-way deal with these stations.

  #13   Report Post  
Old September 11th 07, 07:43 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,817
Default HD Hypocrisy


"RHF" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Sep 11, 9:15 am, (Michael Black) wrote:

IMHO - KGO is what every 50 KW "Clear-Channel"
AM/MW Radio Station should be :
* Regional Coverage and Programming to Match
* Original Local Hosts and Programming
* No Syndication Allowed
Resulting in 100 Distinct Radio Voices Across the Nation


And revenues off by a third since 2000.


  #14   Report Post  
Old September 11th 07, 07:54 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,243
Default HD Hypocrisy



David Eduardo wrote:

"RHF" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Sep 11, 9:15 am, (Michael Black) wrote:

IMHO - KGO is what every 50 KW "Clear-Channel"
AM/MW Radio Station should be :
* Regional Coverage and Programming to Match
* Original Local Hosts and Programming
* No Syndication Allowed
Resulting in 100 Distinct Radio Voices Across the Nation


And revenues off by a third since 2000.


2000? Isn't that when you adopted the 'Eduardo' shtick?


  #15   Report Post  
Old September 11th 07, 08:50 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,324
Default HD Hypocrisy

On Sep 11, 11:44 am, wrote:
On Sep 11, 5:07 am, Steve wrote:

DXers may be one thin slice of the population, but the option to DX is
one that many people value, whether they (currently) DX very often or
not.


Again, what we value as a small group just doesn't matter to the
masses. I am disappointed that DISH NETWORK and DIRECT TV are not
allowed, by law, to sell me a package with out-of-town stations
without my local stations agreeing, which they won't. I can spend
$1,000 for a large tv antenna installation and pick up many out-of-
town stations, but I can't subscribe to get those SAME stations on
satellite. The reason -- the industry does NOT want me (or anyone
else) watching out-of-town stations because that means I am not
watching the local stations with local commercials. I tried getting
waivers from the local stations and every one of them refused.

I have been both a radio and tv dxer for over 50 years and know the
fun and excitement this hobby has given me. MOST tv dxing is done on
channels 2 through 6. In 2009, looks like that hobby will be history.


Again, having the option to DX matters to many people in much the way
that having the option to one day visit Lake Tahoe does. So, the
"masses: aren't the problem. The problem is companies like Ibiquity
that will gladly destroy a big swath of the spectrum in order to turn
a quick profit.

The only good news is that it will be a quick and shortlived profit,
as the business model of HD (or at any rate HD AM) is laughable.



  #16   Report Post  
Old September 11th 07, 08:52 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,324
Default HD Hypocrisy

On Sep 11, 12:39 pm, RHF wrote:
On Sep 11, 6:14 am, Steve wrote:





On Sep 11, 1:31 am, wrote:


HD Radio is the ONLY solution I can come up with in order to listen to
ANY AM station in my city - even the very powerful signals - while in
my home office, where I spend a good deal of time. With dimmer
switches, electronic air cleaners, computer, etc. etc. the noise level
wipes out all signals. I have to go to another room in the house if I
want to listen to AM analog. HD Radio is a blessing for me.


With so many complaining about the interference it causes on analog
signals - someone please tell me which analog station(s) in the Fresno
area are getting this interference. I can't locate ANY analog station
with ANY interference when in a "quiet" room in my home, and there are
MANY HD stations broadcasting in Fresno. I use both the CCRadio and
the CCRadio-SW and just don't have that problem, or at least haven't
been able to identify it.


I understand some of the complaints, but the industry isn't concerned
with those who dx. In fact, I have the problem with television
signals. When I moved to the Fresno area from Sacramento, I paid
$1,000 for a large tv antenna installation so that I could pick up the
major stations from Sacramento, about 180 miles from me. Shortly
after paying $1,000, the low-powered stations started appearing all
over the dial and wiped out channels 3 and 13 from Sacramento, channel
12 from Santa Barbara, channel 8 from Salinas, etc. But that's life.
TV and Radio are for the masses, NOT just the few who dx as a hobby.
HDTV has solved the tv problem for me as now I get channels 3 and 13
on digital tv. HD Radio solves the problem I have with too much
electrical noise on AM.


No one really cares about the hobbiest. We are left out of the
picture when technology changes.


Here you go:


http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...m-details.asp?...


You'll be using this long after no one in this group can remember what
HD radio was.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


-http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?...

Oxx Digital Wireless Internet Radio and Music Centerhttp://www.tigerdirect.com/include/AddCartfromGallery.asp?EdpNo=32382...

Steve,

* Requires a Computer / WiFi Network

* Plus Monthly Costs for Internet Service

Real Radio is FREE ! ~ RHF
.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


I assume that if the guy has a home office, he has a computer and
internet access.

  #17   Report Post  
Old September 11th 07, 08:53 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,324
Default HD Hypocrisy

On Sep 11, 1:43 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message

oups.com...

On Sep 11, 9:15 am, (Michael Black) wrote:


IMHO - KGO is what every 50 KW "Clear-Channel"
AM/MW Radio Station should be :
* Regional Coverage and Programming to Match
* Original Local Hosts and Programming
* No Syndication Allowed
Resulting in 100 Distinct Radio Voices Across the Nation


And revenues off by a third since 2000.


How are the revenues for colloidal silver, by the way?

  #18   Report Post  
Old September 12th 07, 12:31 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 962
Default HD Hypocrisy

wrote:
On Sep 11, 5:07 am, Steve wrote:

DXers may be one thin slice of the population, but the option to DX is
one that many people value, whether they (currently) DX very often or
not.

Again, what we value as a small group just doesn't matter to the
masses.



The naivete of this statement This decision wasn't made by the
masses. It was made by broadcasters. Broadcasters seeking to control
content local market citizens have access to--one of two Holy Grails of
broadcasting since the invention of the medium. (The other is
subscription radio--watch your etherspace for this development.)

If this decision was actually made by the masses, it may be a
different story. And it may be less caustic going down. But it wasn't.
Make no mistake, this decision was made by broadcasters, seeking to
limit choices.

What you fail to realize, here, too, is that there is another
interference problem with HD....when a station out of your market
interferes with your LOCAL station. That's not a DX situation...and it's
happening now, today, this minute. I'm experiencing it personally. And
it's been reported in the trades from DC to LA. It's been in editorial
columns in local papers.

It's a real issue.

And imagine the results at night.

Then there is the issue of shortfalls in the HD pattern in the local
market. Reports of 60% coverage and less have been coming in for a
while, now. Leaving non HD reception areas subject to the same noise,
interference, and unpleasant artifacts, as well as poorer audio.

The facts, as they are coming in, appear that HD, especially on AM,
is not living up to the promise, and will be the final nail in the
coffin of MW broadcasting. Allowing the spectrum to finally be closed,
auctioned off, and content moved to FM where it has a chance of
commercial viability.

But this is not about what the masses want. Of even care about. If
it were, there would be no end of commercially available HD receivers
and they would be flying off shelves by the tens of millions.

The masses simply do not care. And as the months drag on, they
appear to care even less.

One thing I've been saying since the HD radio noise began, is that
for HD to take off with the public, there would have to be an FCC
mandate that HD be included in all receivers, or that a cutoff date be
made for analog radio. The same way as television.

September 14th, there will be something equally as effective, as AM
HD begins to reach into the hours of greatest propagation. The only way
to filter out the crap that's skipping into the local market, will be
through a digital receiver. We should know within 30 days, if the
increased trash on the bands will have a measureable effect on the
public's listening, HD adoption, or both.

But the only ones who appear to care about HD radio, at least as of
today, are the broadcasters, and the purveyors/licensees of the hardware
and firmware that make HD (more or less) happen.

Big (Corporate) Brother making decisions for the mass.

And look at all those defending his actions.


Orwell has to be laughing his dry, wrinkly ass off.






  #19   Report Post  
Old September 12th 07, 12:43 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2007
Posts: 707
Default HD Hypocrisy

On Sep 11, 12:39 pm, RHF wrote:
On Sep 11, 6:14 am, Steve wrote:





On Sep 11, 1:31 am, wrote:


HD Radio is the ONLY solution I can come up with in order to listen to
ANY AM station in my city - even the very powerful signals - while in
my home office, where I spend a good deal of time. With dimmer
switches, electronic air cleaners, computer, etc. etc. the noise level
wipes out all signals. I have to go to another room in the house if I
want to listen to AM analog. HD Radio is a blessing for me.


With so many complaining about the interference it causes on analog
signals - someone please tell me which analog station(s) in the Fresno
area are getting this interference. I can't locate ANY analog station
with ANY interference when in a "quiet" room in my home, and there are
MANY HD stations broadcasting in Fresno. I use both the CCRadio and
the CCRadio-SW and just don't have that problem, or at least haven't
been able to identify it.


I understand some of the complaints, but the industry isn't concerned
with those who dx. In fact, I have the problem with television
signals. When I moved to the Fresno area from Sacramento, I paid
$1,000 for a large tv antenna installation so that I could pick up the
major stations from Sacramento, about 180 miles from me. Shortly
after paying $1,000, the low-powered stations started appearing all
over the dial and wiped out channels 3 and 13 from Sacramento, channel
12 from Santa Barbara, channel 8 from Salinas, etc. But that's life.
TV and Radio are for the masses, NOT just the few who dx as a hobby.
HDTV has solved the tv problem for me as now I get channels 3 and 13
on digital tv. HD Radio solves the problem I have with too much
electrical noise on AM.


No one really cares about the hobbiest. We are left out of the
picture when technology changes.


Here you go:


http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...m-details.asp?...


You'll be using this long after no one in this group can remember what
HD radio was.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


-http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?...

Oxx Digital Wireless Internet Radio and Music Centerhttp://www.tigerdirect.com/include/AddCartfromGallery.asp?EdpNo=32382...

Steve,

* Requires a Computer / WiFi Network

* Plus Monthly Costs for Internet Service

Real Radio is FREE ! ~ RHF
.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Not for long:

"Is Pay-for-Play HD Content on Horizon?"

http://rwonline.com/pages/s.0049/t.4028.html

HD radios require AM-loop and externally-mounted FM-dipole antennas -
HD Radio's Achille's Heel.

  #20   Report Post  
Old September 12th 07, 12:44 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2007
Posts: 707
Default HD Hypocrisy

On Sep 11, 12:39?pm, RHF wrote:
On Sep 11, 6:14 am, Steve wrote:





On Sep 11, 1:31 am, wrote:


HD Radio is the ONLY solution I can come up with in order to listen to
ANY AM station in my city - even the very powerful signals - while in
my home office, where I spend a good deal of time. With dimmer
switches, electronic air cleaners, computer, etc. etc. the noise level
wipes out all signals. I have to go to another room in the house if I
want to listen to AM analog. HD Radio is a blessing for me.


With so many complaining about the interference it causes on analog
signals - someone please tell me which analog station(s) in the Fresno
area are getting this interference. I can't locate ANY analog station
with ANY interference when in a "quiet" room in my home, and there are
MANY HD stations broadcasting in Fresno. I use both the CCRadio and
the CCRadio-SW and just don't have that problem, or at least haven't
been able to identify it.


I understand some of the complaints, but the industry isn't concerned
with those who dx. In fact, I have the problem with television
signals. When I moved to the Fresno area from Sacramento, I paid
$1,000 for a large tv antenna installation so that I could pick up the
major stations from Sacramento, about 180 miles from me. Shortly
after paying $1,000, the low-powered stations started appearing all
over the dial and wiped out channels 3 and 13 from Sacramento, channel
12 from Santa Barbara, channel 8 from Salinas, etc. But that's life.
TV and Radio are for the masses, NOT just the few who dx as a hobby.
HDTV has solved the tv problem for me as now I get channels 3 and 13
on digital tv. HD Radio solves the problem I have with too much
electrical noise on AM.


No one really cares about the hobbiest. We are left out of the
picture when technology changes.


Here you go:


http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...m-details.asp?...


You'll be using this long after no one in this group can remember what
HD radio was.- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


-http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?...

Oxx Digital Wireless Internet Radio and Music Centerhttp://www.tigerdirect.com/include/AddCartfromGallery.asp?EdpNo=32382...

Steve,

* Requires a Computer / WiFi Network

* Plus Monthly Costs for Internet Service

Real Radio is FREE ! ~ RHF
.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


HD/IBOC requires initial, expensive, and on-going hardware and
licensing fees to iNiquity.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Landfags hypocrisy I Am Not George CB 5 October 17th 04 07:07 AM
John Kerry's hypocrisy proves his contempt for voter intelligence Llgpt Shortwave 7 April 14th 04 12:03 AM
Landshark Is King Of Hypocrisy Hawaii 5-0 CB 0 January 13th 04 05:18 AM
REAL twitsed HYPOCRISY Duke Of RRCB CB 24 January 11th 04 06:00 PM
TWISTEDHED HYPOCRISY Duke Of RRCB CB 3 January 10th 04 02:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017