RHF ) writes:
WEWN {EWTN} - Open-Line on 5850 kHz @ 10:10 UTC
.
http://groups.google.com/group/short...e3203770d90957
.
[stuff deleted]

You do realize, since you posted about "netiquette" you must have
read the stuff, that you are now technically spamming?

You are now cluttering up this newsgroup with advertising to another
space, that "google group". The only purpose of your post is
to direct attention to that "google group". You are not adding
to the discussion here, since you aren't actually really saying
anything in these posts.

Plus your long pasted in bit about those other groups is
at the very least repetitive, and thus qualifies as spam.

Note that a signature block is properly defined so it
is recognized by real newsreader software as a signature
and then when people reply with a proper newsreader, the signature
disappears. SOme of your recent nonsense has had the same
material included three times, as people aren't snipping the
quoted material.

But there are also community standards about the length of a
signature, and you don't fit those standards, even if your
"signature" was properly defined as a legit signature.

The good news is that it appears we can get someone's google
account cancelled for abuse of this newsgroup. And you've
set yourself up for not only lots of abuse reports, but
you keep blundering away with your abuse, making the case
real easy.

Michael

Michael Black - So In Your 'Opinion' Posting Shortwave Listener's
Radio Reception Reports are Off-Topic and "SPAM"

The Subject Line :
WEWN {EWTN} - Open-Line on 5850 kHz @ 10:10 UTC

and the First Line of the Post say it all :
WEWN {EWTN} - Open-Line on 5850 kHz @ 10:10 UTC

Plus I provide a Link to those who want to Read the Full Report :
http://groups.google.com/group/short...e3203770d90957

Any Shortwave Listener (SWL) who wants to : Can Dial-Up
the Frequency and Check-It-Out at the Time Stated.

WEWN {EWTN} - Open-Line on 5850 kHz @ 10:10 UTC

A few will - Many Will Not - It is after-all their Choice.
- - - Choice Is A Good Thing IMHO.

FWIW - The Vast Majority of RRS Newsgroup Readers
have Learned {Choose} Not to Read Anything I Post.
- - - It Is Their Right "Freedom-of-Choice" To Do So.

OTOH - A Small Number of RRS Newsgroup Readers
find what I post to be of some relative Interest to them
with respect to the Subject of Shortwave Radio Listening
(SWL) and They "Choose" To Read Many Things that I Post.
- - - Again - It Is Their Right "Freedom-of-Choice" To Do So.

MB - I am glad that we had this Discussion and Happy that
I provided you with something to Criticize and Complain about
today. Have A Nice Day -unless- You have made other plans.

now pease go and enjoy your radios ~ RHF


More "Fisking" Follows [ TO FISK ]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisking

On Sep 11, 8:30 am, (Michael Black) wrote:
RHF ) writes:
WEWN {EWTN} - Open-Line on 5850 kHz @ 10:10 UTC
.
http://groups.google.com/group/short...eports/msg/56e...
.

[stuff deleted]

You do realize, since you posted about "netiquette" you must have
read the stuff, that you are now technically spamming?

You are now cluttering up this newsgroup with advertising to another
space, that "google group". The only purpose of your post is
to direct attention to that "google group".

- You are not adding to the discussion here, since you
- aren't actually really saying anything in these posts.

WEWN {EWTN} - Open-Line on 5850 kHz @ 10:10 UTC
- - - Says It All To A Shortwave Listener (SWL) - - -

Plus I provide a Link for those who want to Read the Full Report

http://groups.google.com/group/short...e3203770d90957

MB - So in your 'opinion' Posting a Shortwave Listener's Radio
Reception Report (SWR3) to "Rec.Radio.Shortwave" which is
after all a Shortwave Radio Listeners News Group are Off-Topic
and SPAM - YOUR LOGIC BOGGLES THE MIND !

Plus your long pasted in bit about those other groups is
at the very least repetitive, and thus qualifies as spam.

Shortwave Radio Listening is a "Repetitive" Hobby and
can involve several Hours of Radio Listening per Day.

Point-of-Fact - I Enjoy Listening To The Radio All Day Long !
- - - MB Do You ?

Note that a signature block is properly defined so it
is recognized by real newsreader software as a signature
and then when people reply with a proper newsreader, the signature
disappears. SOme of your recent nonsense has had the same
material included three times, as people aren't snipping the
quoted material.

MB - That is your personal Problem and a Problem caused
by others who Reply without trimming their replies.

I Post to this Newsgroup and Read this Newsgroup
on Google Groups - No New Reader Required.

But there are also community standards about the length of a
signature, and you don't fit those standards, even if your
"signature" was properly defined as a legit signature.

Yes I Am An Odd-Ball of sorts.

The good news is that it appears we can get someone's google
account cancelled for abuse of this newsgroup.

Yes You Would Be Happy To See Cuhulin Gone and would
most likely like to have an American Free RRS Newsgroup.

And you've set yourself up for not only lots of abuse reports,
but you keep blundering away with your abuse, making the
case real easy.

Be My Guest - Enjoy Yourself - Bring It On !
- - - Push It To The Limit One More Time . . .

Michael

michael, Michael. MICHAEL ! - Have A Nice Day ) ~ RHF

= = = On Sep 11, 12:38 pm,
= = = (Michael Black) wrote:
- - RHF ) writes:
- - Michael Black - So In Your 'Opinion' Posting Shortwave Listener's
- - Radio Reception Reports are Off-Topic and "SPAM"
-
- No bozo, the issue is that there's no report here.

I Think The Issue Is - You Need an Issue.

You have nothing valid to say,

One Man's In-Validity -is- Another Man's Self-Validity.

I Think
"WEWN {EWTN} - Open-Line on 5850 kHz @ 10:10 UTC"
says a lot to the 'average' Newsgroup Reader who
Lacks your need for Exalted Posting Standards
and Meaningful Relevance.

you are merely pointing to something somewhere else.

Isn't That What Links/URLs Are For ?
- - - Why Waste the Bandwidth when a One Line Descrition
and a Link/URL will do ?

We do not need to see such junk posts on a regular basis.

? "We" ?

One Man's Junk -is- Another Man's Treasure.

If you were actually posting a reception report here, without
all that junk pointing to elsewhere, then I wouldn't say a thing.

Oh Really - Who Would You Have To Attack Then Cuhulin;
DX Ace; - I am 'sure' that You would Find Someone and Some
Cause to Attack.

A proper reception report includes far more details. Your single
line "report" wouldn't get you a QSL from any station, since
there's nothing to suggest you actually did receive it, and nothing
about signal strength or the other things that a station might
be interested in hearin about.

Thanks for Educating Me.

(I should point out that reception
reports were not merely about scoring QSL cards, at least not
in the early days. They were a means for a transmitting station
to get feedback, about the quality of their transmission and
the extent of their reception area.)

Thanks for the History Leason.

But you aren't. You're posting something
with the intent of pointing elsewhere.

And You Get To Point Your Finger.

You've decided you can fix up this newsgroup,
but you can't because you continue to blunder.

Fixing this Newsgroup is an Absurd - An Act of Madness

MB - That statement would also apply to You "Fixing" Me.

You've decided that it needs "on topic" posts, but
all you are posting is filler, nothing important in itself.

It's Important To Me -and- For Me It's Good Enough.

Like I said months ago, you've picked up the worst habits
of bad posters, and think they will fix the newsgroup.

Does this Newsgroup need Fixing ?

I'm certain by now everyone has seen your pointers
to elsewhere.

Yes I Am Sure That They Have.

There is no reason to clutter up the newsgroup
some more with what amount to empty posts.

One Man's Clutter -is- Another Man's "Hey That's Interesting"

Note that if you're advertising something, like those other
"groups", community standards allow for a pointer in the
signature.

While I may be a Nasty Net-Nazi - You are clearly the
Champion of this Newsgroups"Community Standards" :
- - - I am in awe of your presence here among us
lessor beings; such as I.

But you can't even conjure up a proper signature line.
And even then, you would need to be posting something
that adds to the existing discussion, not merely posting
so people might see your signature.

You Are So RIght - I 'feel' like a Total Failure.

I want you to live up to community standards, and that's
why I'm picking apart your posts.

I Don't Deserve You - thank you, Thank You. THANK YOU !

You are still pathalogically changing the subject headers.

You Are So RIght - I 'feel' so Pathological and Pathetic.

Start living up to community standards, including proper
formation of sentences with only the usual amount of
punctuation marks, and quoting only which you are specifically
replying to, and keeping subject headers constant, and
not posting empty posts, and quoting properly (you are
now, or maybe continue to quote badly, so it's not really
clear at what point your post starts and the bit you
are quoting ends.

yes, Yes. YES ! - My Sins Are Many.

Once you live up to those community standards, it would
be far easier to understand what you are saying. And
then we can decide whether or not you have any value
here or not.

? 'we' ? - I 'feel' so Value-Less.

And finally, if everyone is ignoring you, then what's the
point of posting your junk?

Alas - I Post For Only - me, Me. ME !

Michael

MB,

Remember - You Are Talking To and Arguing With A "Bozo"
- - - Consider the Possibilities and Permutations . . .

~ RHF