Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BROADCAST RADIO: continuing to suck wind"
Well, yet another Top 40 station near me officially bit the dust almost exactly an hour ago. At noon Eastern time, the local Indianapolis pop/hip hop station, WNOU "Radio Now" 93.1, switched to a temporary format of all-Christmas-music-all-the-time through the end of the year, at which point it'll be replaced by an FM-dial version of local WIBC's news/talk format. The local owner of the station, Emmis Communications, has been on the financial ropes due to mismanagement and an overly-aggressive expansion strategy for quite some time now, as it struggled (and failed) to try to keep up with the radio-industry behemoth, Clear Channel Communications. But even Clear Channel has seen more than its fair share of financial woes lately, and what was once the 800-lb. gorilla in the radio universe is now on the cusp of having to be taken private just in order to be able to stay afloat. Emmis can spin-doctor its "choice" to switch from a music to a talk format all it wants, but anyone who's paying the slightest bit of attention in the radio industry knows damn well what is really going on here. The funding for the Clear Channel private equity deal dried up at about the same time that the RIAA released its latest batch of truly dismal numbers regarding the state of purchased recorded music in the country. Quite simply, no one cares about playlisted radio any more. Since it's becoming easier (not to mention cheaper) to put together one's own personalized playlists online through the myriad of streaming options available out there, even so-called "HD radio", which broadcasts in the digital frequencies between the regular analog ones, hasn't taken off the way industry peeps expected it to. And that means advertisers, the lifeblood of any "free" music station, have been deserting in droves for other avenues. Just about the only viable option LEFT on the FM dial any more is news/ talk, just as it was in the late seventies when listeners deserted AM en masse for greener pastures. And on-air yakkers are a lot cheaper to find, by the dozen, than their relatively more diva-esque DJ counterparts, who get paid just as much but are on the air something like 80% less. This is it, people. You read it here first. Music is officially dead. It's the end of the world. Society is on the brink of utter collapse. Get in your bomb shelters now, we're all gonna die. XD http://ozy-y2k.livejournal.com/338426.html Ha! Ha! Eduardo! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "IBOCcrock" wrote in message oups.com... Ha! Ha! Eduardo! Music is hardly dead... there are 20 FMs in the market, 16 with signals good enough to be considered viable. On single station that changed from a less-than-successful music format to talk does not mean music audiences are down... it just means that the change is on to move successful AM formats to Fm where they are accessible to under-55 listeners in a form they will use. WIBC (AM) has been third or fourth in the market in the last few years, and used to be a solid #1. The decline in 25-54 has affected them, so they are going to put the format on FM where they believe they can recover the younger, salable age groups. They will put a sports format on 1070, which is a good use of the facility. In that market, there is only one other AM in the top 20, a Black gospel station. After that, no AM has more than a 1 share. There were only 11 AM shares total in the market in Spring, and less than 7 shares in 25-54. WIBC moved to FM because their opportunities on AM were very limited and in decline. This is what I have been saying for years... the only viable AM format, talk, and its variants, will be moving to FM over the next few years and AM will be limited to very niche formats and brokered services at that point. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 1:39 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
This is what I have been saying for years... the only viable AM format, talk, and its variants, will be moving to FM over the next few years and AM will be limited to very niche formats and brokered services at that point. This isn't what you've been saying. It's what you've been trying to cause. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 1:39?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"IBOCcrock" wrote in message oups.com... Ha! Ha! Eduardo! Music is hardly dead... there are 20 FMs in the market, 16 with signals good enough to be considered viable. On single station that changed from a less-than-successful music format to talk does not mean music audiences are down... it just means that the change is on to move successful AM formats to Fm where they are accessible to under-55 listeners in a form they will use. WIBC (AM) has been third or fourth in the market in the last few years, and used to be a solid #1. The decline in 25-54 has affected them, so they are going to put the format on FM where they believe they can recover the younger, salable age groups. They will put a sports format on 1070, which is a good use of the facility. In that market, there is only one other AM in the top 20, a Black gospel station. After that, no AM has more than a 1 share. There were only 11 AM shares total in the market in Spring, and less than 7 shares in 25-54. WIBC moved to FM because their opportunities on AM were very limited and in decline. This is what I have been saying for years... the only viable AM format, talk, and its variants, will be moving to FM over the next few years and AM will be limited to very niche formats and brokered services at that point. That's right Steve - destroy AM with IBOC, then move the news/talk/ sports to FMs. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 1:39?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"IBOCcrock" wrote in message oups.com... Ha! Ha! Eduardo! Music is hardly dead... there are 20 FMs in the market, 16 with signals good enough to be considered viable. On single station that changed from a less-than-successful music format to talk does not mean music audiences are down... it just means that the change is on to move successful AM formats to Fm where they are accessible to under-55 listeners in a form they will use. WIBC (AM) has been third or fourth in the market in the last few years, and used to be a solid #1. The decline in 25-54 has affected them, so they are going to put the format on FM where they believe they can recover the younger, salable age groups. They will put a sports format on 1070, which is a good use of the facility. In that market, there is only one other AM in the top 20, a Black gospel station. After that, no AM has more than a 1 share. There were only 11 AM shares total in the market in Spring, and less than 7 shares in 25-54. WIBC moved to FM because their opportunities on AM were very limited and in decline. This is what I have been saying for years... the only viable AM format, talk, and its variants, will be moving to FM over the next few years and AM will be limited to very niche formats and brokered services at that point. "Fresh FM vs. Stale FM" "'No FM' is really where I see the next generation and future ones heading. It is very unlikely they will redirect their attention from iPods, computers, social networks and, now, mobile devices back to a radio. And they certainly don't want a radio in these devices." http://insidemusicmedia.blogspot.com...-stale-fm.html If continued lack of interest in music FMs don't kill them off, then the new royality rates will. The whole terrestrial industry is dying. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "IBOCcrock" wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 8, 1:39?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "IBOCcrock" wrote in message oups.com... Ha! Ha! Eduardo! Music is hardly dead... there are 20 FMs in the market, 16 with signals good enough to be considered viable. On single station that changed from a less-than-successful music format to talk does not mean music audiences are down... it just means that the change is on to move successful AM formats to Fm where they are accessible to under-55 listeners in a form they will use. WIBC (AM) has been third or fourth in the market in the last few years, and used to be a solid #1. The decline in 25-54 has affected them, so they are going to put the format on FM where they believe they can recover the younger, salable age groups. They will put a sports format on 1070, which is a good use of the facility. In that market, there is only one other AM in the top 20, a Black gospel station. After that, no AM has more than a 1 share. There were only 11 AM shares total in the market in Spring, and less than 7 shares in 25-54. WIBC moved to FM because their opportunities on AM were very limited and in decline. This is what I have been saying for years... the only viable AM format, talk, and its variants, will be moving to FM over the next few years and AM will be limited to very niche formats and brokered services at that point. That's right Steve - destroy AM with IBOC, then move the news/talk/ sports to FMs. The ageing and decline of AM in salable demographics goes back to the 80's, and has simply gotton worse of late. It is an issue totally unrelated to HD. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 2:21?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"IBOCcrock" wrote in message ups.com... On Oct 8, 1:39?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "IBOCcrock" wrote in message groups.com... Ha! Ha! Eduardo! Music is hardly dead... there are 20 FMs in the market, 16 with signals good enough to be considered viable. On single station that changed from a less-than-successful music format to talk does not mean music audiences are down... it just means that the change is on to move successful AM formats to Fm where they are accessible to under-55 listeners in a form they will use. WIBC (AM) has been third or fourth in the market in the last few years, and used to be a solid #1. The decline in 25-54 has affected them, so they are going to put the format on FM where they believe they can recover the younger, salable age groups. They will put a sports format on 1070, which is a good use of the facility. In that market, there is only one other AM in the top 20, a Black gospel station. After that, no AM has more than a 1 share. There were only 11 AM shares total in the market in Spring, and less than 7 shares in 25-54. WIBC moved to FM because their opportunities on AM were very limited and in decline. This is what I have been saying for years... the only viable AM format, talk, and its variants, will be moving to FM over the next few years and AM will be limited to very niche formats and brokered services at that point. That's right Steve - destroy AM with IBOC, then move the news/talk/ sports to FMs. The ageing and decline of AM in salable demographics goes back to the 80's, and has simply gotton worse of late. It is an issue totally unrelated to HD. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And Gen Y has abandonded FM radio for iPods, cell phones, Satellite Radio, etc - as I said, your whole industy is screwed. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "IBOCcrock" wrote in message ps.com... And Gen Y has abandonded FM radio for iPods, cell phones, Satellite Radio, etc - as I said, your whole industy is screwed. There is no evidence of this in radio listening surveys. There has been an erosion of time spent listening going back to the late 80's, but there is no hastening of the trend since the iPod or satellite radio became available. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 2:15 pm, IBOCcrock wrote:
On Oct 8, 1:39?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "IBOCcrock" wrote in message roups.com... Ha! Ha! Eduardo! Music is hardly dead... there are 20 FMs in the market, 16 with signals good enough to be considered viable. On single station that changed from a less-than-successful music format to talk does not mean music audiences are down... it just means that the change is on to move successful AM formats to Fm where they are accessible to under-55 listeners in a form they will use. WIBC (AM) has been third or fourth in the market in the last few years, and used to be a solid #1. The decline in 25-54 has affected them, so they are going to put the format on FM where they believe they can recover the younger, salable age groups. They will put a sports format on 1070, which is a good use of the facility. In that market, there is only one other AM in the top 20, a Black gospel station. After that, no AM has more than a 1 share. There were only 11 AM shares total in the market in Spring, and less than 7 shares in 25-54. WIBC moved to FM because their opportunities on AM were very limited and in decline. This is what I have been saying for years... the only viable AM format, talk, and its variants, will be moving to FM over the next few years and AM will be limited to very niche formats and brokered services at that point. "Fresh FM vs. Stale FM" "'No FM' is really where I see the next generation and future ones heading. It is very unlikely they will redirect their attention from iPods, computers, social networks and, now, mobile devices back to a radio. And they certainly don't want a radio in these devices." http://insidemusicmedia.blogspot.com...-stale-fm.html If continued lack of interest in music FMs don't kill them off, then the new royality rates will. The whole terrestrial industry is dying.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think you're probably right about that. People like to be in control of their own listening, and they like to have as many choices as possible, especially when it comes to music. FM broadcast will never be able to keep up with the internet or with ipods and similar devices. FM broadcast is already a dinosaur, but as we've seen many times in this group, some people love dinosaurs--especially when those people's professional interests are entangled with the fate of dinosaurs. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 5:35 pm, Steve wrote:
On Oct 8, 2:15 pm, IBOCcrock wrote: On Oct 8, 1:39?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "IBOCcrock" wrote in message roups.com... Ha! Ha! Eduardo! Music is hardly dead... there are 20 FMs in the market, 16 with signals good enough to be considered viable. On single station that changed from a less-than-successful music format to talk does not mean music audiences are down... it just means that the change is on to move successful AM formats to Fm where they are accessible to under-55 listeners in a form they will use. WIBC (AM) has been third or fourth in the market in the last few years, and used to be a solid #1. The decline in 25-54 has affected them, so they are going to put the format on FM where they believe they can recover the younger, salable age groups. They will put a sports format on 1070, which is a good use of the facility. In that market, there is only one other AM in the top 20, a Black gospel station. After that, no AM has more than a 1 share. There were only 11 AM shares total in the market in Spring, and less than 7 shares in 25-54. WIBC moved to FM because their opportunities on AM were very limited and in decline. This is what I have been saying for years... the only viable AM format, talk, and its variants, will be moving to FM over the next few years and AM will be limited to very niche formats and brokered services at that point. "Fresh FM vs. Stale FM" "'No FM' is really where I see the next generation and future ones heading. It is very unlikely they will redirect their attention from iPods, computers, social networks and, now, mobile devices back to a radio. And they certainly don't want a radio in these devices." http://insidemusicmedia.blogspot.com...-stale-fm.html If continued lack of interest in music FMs don't kill them off, then the new royality rates will. The whole terrestrial industry is dying.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think you're probably right about that. People like to be in control of their own listening, and they like to have as many choices as possible, especially when it comes to music. FM broadcast will never be able to keep up with the internet or with ipods and similar devices. FM broadcast is already a dinosaur, but as we've seen many times in this group, some people love dinosaurs--especially when those people's professional interests are entangled with the fate of dinosaurs.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You know- I can have all my own programmed music that I want - and the world has been able to do that since we started having 8 tracks in cars - then cassettes - then CD's - now ipods and MP3's - but I still like listening to the radio. Mostly - FM - some AM -- but I still - almost always turn on the radio. I listen to the stations that play all sorts of stuff and include commercials. I realize I am an oddity here -- but there are still people out there that prefer to listen to terrestial radio. It's a bit like choosing to watch non - cable TV stations as opposed to having dozens of channels to choose from courtesy of DISH networks. And I think - but I could be wrong - that terrestial radio will survive. Just like AM has survived since the advent of FM. AM is not the same animal it was - but it's still there. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
continuing real-time solar wind data - public comment | Antenna | |||
continuing real-time solar wind data - public comment | Dx | |||
continuing real-time solar wind data - public comment | Shortwave | |||
NYC radio: Does it suck or what? (92.7 FM WLIR is now gone!) | Broadcasting | |||
I'm looking for a wind-up s/w radio. | Shortwave |