On Jan 18, 7:20*pm, RHF wrote:
On Jan 18, 6:17*am, Rfburns wrote:

On Jan 18, 8:45 am, David wrote:

Kim wrote:
Test will be in CW no modulation.

http://www.arrl.org/?artid=7958

Kim

Hasn't this already been done? *With a lot less power?

Not at these low frequencies - jw
-
- HAARP Test - *Lunar Echo Experiment
- Broadcast Dates and CW Frequencies
-
- 19 JAN 2008 - Maybe 18 JAN in your 'Local' Time Zone.
- 6,792.5 kHz @ 05:00 ~ 06:00 UTC
- 7,407.5 kHz @ 06:00 ~ 07:00 UTC
-
- 20 JAN 2008 - Maybe 19 JAN in your 'Local' Time Zone.
- 6,792.5 kHz @ 06:30 ~ 07:30 UTC
- 7,407.5 kHz @ 07:30 ~ 08:30 UTC
- *.

FWIW - On 7,407.5 kHz @ 06:15 ~ 06:18 UTC

All I heard was a clear CW Tone about every second
with an S9 Peak at the Tone and an S7 background
noise level on the Frequency.

Re-checked 7,407.5 kHz @ 07:15 but could not hear
any CW Tone and the background noise level on the
Frequency had dropped to around S2.


~ RHF's Radio Shack in Twain Harte, California -USA-
SHACK INFO = http://tinyurl.com/2skmxm

In article
,
3D wrote:

An article should be self-contained, a link should merely be
to reference it. We shouldn't have to go digging because
someone is too lazy to paraphrase what they want to talk about.
(That refers to the original poster.)


Somebody needs a nap.

Don't ask for permission. If you need a nap go take one.

And if "RHF" and his buddies weren't so intent on jabbering
on, it would be far easier to find messages such as these.


RHF is a huge help to people on this newsgroup, he finds answers and
provides links regularly.

That said, the issue is about the needed power. Whatever
power is at the transmitter, it will be terribly attenuated.............

Google works better.

Chest pounding at its finest. Nice job.

First moron I've read in 3D.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California