Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Obnoxious, fatiguing artifact-laden codec. High costs. Self-
interference and analog noise. Adjacent-channel interference. Encoding delay. Limited digital coverage. Necessitates drastically reduced analog bandwidth. Won't work with a large percentage of existing directional arrays. Engineers hate it; listeners couldn't care less. To these well-known HD-AM features we can now add: IBOC-AM can damage power modules in the latest generation Harris 50kw transmitter, the 3DX-50. There have now surfaced an increasing number of accounts - of course, in typical HD fashion, being forcibly hushed by IBOC powers-that-be - that the HD encoding and COFDM system can cause transient drive failure to MOSFETS in the PA modules of the popular high-power Harris AM transmitter being used by a large number of HD-equipped stations. Result: PAs shut down, forcing reduced-power operation until an engineer can make repairs. There is at least one account of a 50kw midwest station that operates its older-generation transmitter - that's right, a BACKUP - because it's less susceptible to PA damage from HD encoding. Which of course means that the shiny new 3DX-50 is relegated to the status of being an expensive standby TX! An unnamed source in the tech-support department at Broadcast Electronics stated that he was truly thankful for HD Radio. Without HD, the number of employees required to deal with technical problems and issues would likely be halved. I'd sure love to read the technical reports about exactly how the damage occurred. I am assuming that maintaining flat phase in a transmitter array over 50 kHz of spectrum would be difficult. But with the digital sidebands only operating at 500 W, I'm a little curious about how any realistic SWR mismatch at the extremes of the bandwidth could return any more than a few watts back into the MOSFETs. If this can be documented, we should hear a lot more about it if they boost the sideband power on AM! This could really turn the tide against a return of investment on IBOC. I am wondering if it is the reason why analog coverage is also lost, engineers are quietly reducing the transmitter power just so they don't blow output stages http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index.php?topic=94835.0 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, IBOCcrock wrote: Obnoxious, fatiguing artifact-laden codec. High costs. Self- interference and analog noise. Adjacent-channel interference. Encoding delay. Limited digital coverage. Necessitates drastically reduced analog bandwidth. Won't work with a large percentage of existing directional arrays. Engineers hate it; listeners couldn't care less. To these well-known HD-AM features we can now add: IBOC-AM can damage power modules in the latest generation Harris 50kw transmitter, the 3DX-50. There have now surfaced an increasing number of accounts - of course, in typical HD fashion, being forcibly hushed by IBOC powers-that-be - that the HD encoding and COFDM system can cause transient drive failure to MOSFETS in the PA modules of the popular high-power Harris AM transmitter being used by a large number of HD-equipped stations. Result: PAs shut down, forcing reduced-power operation until an engineer can make repairs. There is at least one account of a 50kw midwest station that operates its older-generation transmitter - that's right, a BACKUP - because it's less susceptible to PA damage from HD encoding. Which of course means that the shiny new 3DX-50 is relegated to the status of being an expensive standby TX! An unnamed source in the tech-support department at Broadcast Electronics stated that he was truly thankful for HD Radio. Without HD, the number of employees required to deal with technical problems and issues would likely be halved. I'd sure love to read the technical reports about exactly how the damage occurred. I am assuming that maintaining flat phase in a transmitter array over 50 kHz of spectrum would be difficult. But with the digital sidebands only operating at 500 W, I'm a little curious about how any realistic SWR mismatch at the extremes of the bandwidth could return any more than a few watts back into the MOSFETs. If this can be documented, we should hear a lot more about it if they boost the sideband power on AM! This could really turn the tide against a return of investment on IBOC. I am wondering if it is the reason why analog coverage is also lost, engineers are quietly reducing the transmitter power just so they don't blow output stages http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index.php?topic=94835.0 I can tell you that a transmitter in digital mode needs more headroom than analog needs. Digital mode peak power requirements are steep. Chance are the modules are being driven past their ratings and fail for that reason after a while. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
who do I blow to get into radio? | Policy | |||
who do I blow to get into radio? | CB | |||
blow | CB |