Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hiya...
I'm assembling all the fixings I need for a new antenna. Now that I'm committed to an inverted L with my balun ONLY one foot away from the earthen ground spike... Given that the horizontal section of an inverted L antenna could work directionally, would it be good to use two wires at the top of the vertical section ??? This way you would have one horizontal wire running say north to south and the second horizontal wire angled at 45 deg to run east and west ??? Michael |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
Hiya... I'm assembling all the fixings I need for a new antenna. Now that I'm committed to an inverted L with my balun ONLY one foot away from the earthen ground spike... Given that the horizontal section of an inverted L antenna could work directionally, would it be good to use two wires at the top of the vertical section ??? This way you would have one horizontal wire running say north to south and the second horizontal wire angled at 45 deg to run east and west ??? Michael The proper way to use two horizontal wires would be in a dipole or 'V' configuration but that's a completely different antenna design from an inverted-L. Otherwise there isn't any real benefit of using two horizontal wire sections 90-deg apart. It might be worse than one wire under certain conditions. If you keep the horizontal wire relatively short (30-50/ft) it won't be that directional, except for perhaps the highest shortwave frequencies. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
Hiya... I'm assembling all the fixings I need for a new antenna. Now that I'm committed to an inverted L with my balun ONLY one foot away from the earthen ground spike... Given that the horizontal section of an inverted L antenna could work directionally, would it be good to use two wires at the top of the vertical section ??? This way you would have one horizontal wire running say north to south and the second horizontal wire angled at 45 deg to run east and west ??? Michael The math is staggering. The concept of random wire includes the hard fact that at some freqs the antenna works broadside, at others it is end firing. Height above the ground also affects directionality quite a bit. If you really want something closer to omni, go with a sloper, rather than an "L". |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message m... Michael wrote: Hiya... I'm assembling all the fixings I need for a new antenna. Now that I'm committed to an inverted L with my balun ONLY one foot away from the earthen ground spike... Given that the horizontal section of an inverted L antenna could work directionally, would it be good to use two wires at the top of the vertical section ??? This way you would have one horizontal wire running say north to south and the second horizontal wire angled at 45 deg to run east and west ??? Michael The math is staggering. The concept of random wire includes the hard fact that at some freqs the antenna works broadside, at others it is end firing. Height above the ground also affects directionality quite a bit. If you really want something closer to omni, go with a sloper, rather than an "L". Dave, I have a sloping "L" is that any good. It works fine for me. Burr's Radio Shack - http://tinyurl.com/3wuscn Red Mountain, California / Bulacan, Philippines |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Burr wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message m... Michael wrote: Hiya... I'm assembling all the fixings I need for a new antenna. Now that I'm committed to an inverted L with my balun ONLY one foot away from the earthen ground spike... Given that the horizontal section of an inverted L antenna could work directionally, would it be good to use two wires at the top of the vertical section ??? This way you would have one horizontal wire running say north to south and the second horizontal wire angled at 45 deg to run east and west ??? Michael The math is staggering. The concept of random wire includes the hard fact that at some freqs the antenna works broadside, at others it is end firing. Height above the ground also affects directionality quite a bit. If you really want something closer to omni, go with a sloper, rather than an "L". Dave, I have a sloping "L" is that any good. It works fine for me. Burr's Radio Shack - http://tinyurl.com/3wuscn Red Mountain, California / Bulacan, Philippines Of course. I have a J shaped 150' wire on a 70' X 100' rectangular lot. I can hear airplanes from 4,000 miles away. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RHF wrote:
This is especially true for the Shortwave Listener using a Ground Rod at Point 'A' with a 9:1 Matching Transformer and Coax Cable feed-in-line. What's Missing ? - Point 'B' for the Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) who does not have/make a Point 'B' in their backyard -but- Does have both Points 'A' and 'C' the Sloper Antenna is a very good 'choice' in Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) Antennas. While -IF- a Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) has/can make all three Points 'A', 'B' and 'C' in their backyard -then- An Inverted "L" Antenna is a very good 'choice' in Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) Antennas. Again - When the Shortwave Listener uses a Ground Rod at Point 'A' with a 9:1 Matching Transformer and Coax Cable feed-in-line with one or both of these SWL Antenna 'choices'. ??? You still have to keep the unshielded part away from dirty mains electricity or you will pick up noise. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Burr - Take a look at this Shortwave (HF) Antenna.
All-Band Sloping Inverted "L" Antenna -by- Rolf Brevig [LA1IC] http://www.hamuniverse.com/slopinginvl.html Put that 4:1 balun, a couple of insulators and some extra wire to good use! -source- Ham Universe - http://www.hamuniverse.com/ * The Inverted "L" Antenna : How It Works * "Magic" Wire Lengths * Non-Metric {Feet} and Metric {Metres} Calculations * Tuning Procedure for the Inverted Sloping "L" Antenna for Amateur Radio Operators. NOTE - This Sloping Inverted "L" Antenna design uses a a Ground Mounted Matching Transformer and Ground Rod at the Feed-Point with a Coax Cable feed-in-line. Implementing the Low Noise Design Concepts that were popularized -by- John Doty READ - SWL Longwire + Low Noise Antenna Connection + Grounding Is Key To Good Reception Three Messages to Read -by- John Doty http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc6a2bf8acc12d Follow the Links/URLs provided in the Message ? Why ? Use the Sloping Inverted "L" Antenna : It only requires One above ground level Elevated Support Point. MOD - For the Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) making one of these simple Wire Antennas the only "Modification" would be to use a 9:1 Matching Transformer {Balun, MLB} for Receive 'Only' : Instead of the Amateur Ham 4:1 Balun cited for used with a Transmitter. SIZING - The All-Band Sloping Inverted "L" Antenna for the Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) Basic it is simply a "Random" Wire Length to cover the 'available' Space that you have in your Yard : Going from the ground* to the Apex {High-Point} of the Antenna and back to the gorund*. * Note - A Fence-Top may be used at one or both Ends instead of the ground for Safety or convenience. For Those Who - Have-to-Have "Numbers" : * SHORTY - Small Size Lot - Backyard : Short-Back-Leg = 17.1 Feet for 22m Long-Front-Leg = 24.5 Feet for 31m Total Length ~ 41.6 Feet Apex ~ 15 Feet** Ground Foot-Print ~ 30 Feet Tip-to-Tip * AVERAGE - Medium Size Lot - Backyard : Short-Back-Leg = 24.5 Feet for 31m Long-Front-Leg = 38.5 Feet for 49m Total Length ~ 63.0 Feet Apex ~ 22 Feet** Ground Foot-Print ~ 46 Feet Tip-to-Tip * BIGGIE - Large Size Lot - Backyard : Short-Back-Leg = 38.5 Feet for 49m Long-Front-Leg = 59.2 Feet for 75m Total Length ~ 97.7 Feet Apex ~ 34 Feet** Ground Foot-Print ~ 71 Feet Tip-to-Tip ** Note - If you are using a Fence-Top or other Supports : Instead of the surface of the ground : Then add their Average Height to the Apex to get the 'corrected' Height of the Apex. Doing-the-Angles of the Sloping Inverted "L" Antenna : http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/sincos.html The Angle of the Apex should be around 90 Degrees; with the Starting Angle of the Short-Back-Leg at Ground to the Apex about 60 Degrees; and the Ending Angle at Ground of the Long-Front-Leg from the Apex to Ground about 30 Degrees. FWIW - I call this Sloping Inverted "L" Antenna a Lazy Inverted "L" Antenna because the "L" is too 'Lazy' to Stand Up-Side-Down {Inverted} ![]() Be it Sloping or Lazy - It's sort of an 'L' - iane RHF {pomkia} |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 18, 12:22*pm, RHF wrote:
On Apr 18, 5:54*am, Dave wrote: RHF wrote: This is especially true for the Shortwave Listener using a Ground Rod at Point 'A' with a 9:1 Matching Transformer and Coax Cable feed-in-line. What's Missing ? - Point 'B' for the Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) who does not have/make a Point 'B' in their backyard -but- Does have both Points 'A' and 'C' the Sloper Antenna is a very good 'choice' in Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) Antennas. While -IF- a Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) has/can make all three Points 'A', 'B' and 'C' in their backyard -then- AnInverted "L" Antenna is a very good 'choice' in Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) Antennas. Again - When the Shortwave Listener uses a Ground Rod at Point 'A' with a 9:1 Matching Transformer and Coax Cable feed-in-line with one or both of these SWL Antenna 'choices'. - - ??? - - - - You still have to keep the unshielded part away - - from dirty mains electricity or you will pick up noise. - Dave - TGWOS ~ RHF -*. David - That Goes With Out Saying ~ RHF SWL -Newbies- Installing an Inverted "L" Antenna : The Right-Way ! Wellbrook "Low Noise Antenna" 'design concept' using two components they manufactu the Universal Magnetic Balun (UMB) and the Antenna Feed Isolator (Feed-Line-Isolator). http://www.wellbrook.uk.com/longwire.html FWIW - This webpage has two Drawings / Diagrams : "The Wrong Way" -and- "The Correct Way" plus a brief description of the 'Whys' and 'Hows' of this "Low Noise Antenna" design concept. NOTE - These are labled as "Longwire" Antenna Baluns, but in reality they are mostly used on the more common "Random Wire" Antennas that the majority of SWLers are able to build and use in their backyards or outside / inside the house. AGAIN - The Right-Way {and Wrong-Way} to Install a LongWire {Random Wire} Antenna. http://www.wellbrook.uk.com/longwire.html Low Noise Longwire Antenna using the UMB -by- Wellbrook. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...5cc467b35a70d5 The "Correct Way" to Install a Longwire Antenna and Balun by Wellbrook - Using the Far-End Feed-Point Concept http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Shortw.../message/11773 The "Correct Way" to Install a Longwire Antenna and Balun by Wellbrook = http://www.wellbrook.uk.com/longwire.html We have all most likely done it the wrong way more than once . . . A 'key-point' that Wellbrook makes is the Five Metre (5m) "Noise Zone" that exists around a House and getting the Wire Antenna Element away {out} from this area. http://www.wellbrook.uk.com/longwire.html NOTE - The above "Correct Way" installation will ensure that the Wire Antenna Element is 'outside' the local Noise Zone which extends up to Five Metres (16 Feet) around the House. Also the noise pickup is lower with the feeder close to the ground -or- buried under the ground a few inches. -Why- The Antenna and the Balun are within the Local Noise Zone RFI & EMF {Interference Area} that surrounds most buildings up to distance of Five Metres (16 Feet). Read - WHY - The Far-End-Fed Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Inverted "L" Antenna http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...cfc6b9cb2447c0 all i ask for is five metres beyond the noise - iane ~ RHF {pomkia} |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, RHF wrote: On Apr 18, 12:22*pm, RHF wrote: On Apr 18, 5:54*am, Dave wrote: RHF wrote: SNIP Nothing interesting. Nothing useful. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
RHF wrote: SNIP Nothing interesting. Nothing useful. Completely unlike your response to him. mike |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What to do with WILDLY modified HW-7 | Equipment | |||
60m cap what radios have it or could beeasierly modified for it | General | |||
BC-348 modified for use as a BC-342 and BC-312. | Boatanchors | |||
modified DX-394 | Shortwave | |||
FS/FT Modified Radio Shack DX 398 | Swap |