RHF wrote:

On Jul 7, 7:21 pm, m II wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
"Would Jesus Wear a Rolex?"

--Chet Atkins, Margaret Archer.

- Devil worshipping homosexuals wear Rolexes.
-
- mike

Mike that would explain the "Rolex" Logo
that is tattooed on your forehead. ~ RHF
http://www.golfresortsintl.com/images/rolex_logo.jpg

Rolex is good!

I sold 6 (six) of them at one time to a friend of mine in Trieste, Italia!

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


This is over your concern about whether a scan of a 1997 newspaper says
April, 21 or April 23. Whichever the case, it has nothing to do with the
reason I referenced the scan which was to show that, far from being a
"socialite" my mother was very much ahead of her time in being a social
activist and the first woman on the board of a number of Cleveland
institutions, including the county hospital system.

But, she still tossed your sorry ass, because, at least at that time you
were
an embarrassment to you,

So you, smartly, backed off the obsession with a mere two days in a date 11
years ago... one that has no relevance to the subject, anyway.

The fact is that my mother was quite proud of me. She had gone to Europe at
about the same age I went to Mexico, to study painting, so she encouraged me
and was the person who found a way for me to go to Ecuador via Herbert
Evans, president of Nationwide Communications and a member of several
organizations she supported.

By the way, I just posted the Winter 1949 Whites Log, which is the first
to
have a full FM section by location and frequency. It's very interesting
to
peruse.

Great, but that has nothing to do with the fact that you were an
embarrassment
to your mother!

Not really.

On the other hand, while you were thinking uo catchy insults (your usual
anal references have tapered off... 'roids getting to you?) I put on a 1958
and 1968 Whites. The 1958 one is very significant as it is the first one
published by Radio TV Experimenter following the early 1957 death of Mr.
White, creating a laps of some 9 months in publication.

Try and obfuscate some more, you little pervert!

Generally, homophobes make lots of anal references and crack bad gay jokes.
Those that call others names like "pervert" and such tend to have a fear of
being revealed as one themselves. I don't answer to the name "pervert" in
any case, nor do I call persons I don't know by that name, either.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


RHF wrote:

On Jul 7, 7:21 pm, m II wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
"Would Jesus Wear a Rolex?"

--Chet Atkins, Margaret Archer.

- Devil worshipping homosexuals wear Rolexes.
-
- mike

Mike that would explain the "Rolex" Logo
that is tattooed on your forehead. ~ RHF
http://www.golfresortsintl.com/images/rolex_logo.jpg

Rolex is good!

I sold 6 (six) of them at one time to a friend of mine in Trieste, Italia!


I'm guessing the place you bought them was an alleyway in the same
neighborhood.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


This is over your concern about whether a scan of a 1997 newspaper says
April, 21 or April 23. Whichever the case, it has nothing to do with the
reason I referenced the scan which was to show that, far from being a
"socialite" my mother was very much ahead of her time in being a social
activist and the first woman on the board of a number of Cleveland
institutions, including the county hospital system.

But, she still tossed your sorry ass, because, at least at that time you
were
an embarrassment to you,

So you, smartly, backed off the obsession with a mere two days in a date 11
years ago... one that has no relevance to the subject, anyway.

Give it up, boy.

The fact is that my mother was quite proud of me. She had gone to Europe at
about the same age I went to Mexico, to study painting, so she encouraged me
and was the person who found a way for me to go to Ecuador via Herbert
Evans, president of Nationwide Communications and a member of several
organizations she supported.

BS.


By the way, I just posted the Winter 1949 Whites Log, which is the first
to
have a full FM section by location and frequency. It's very interesting
to
peruse.

More obfuscation.

Great, but that has nothing to do with the fact that you were an
embarrassment
to your mother!


On the other hand, while you were thinking uo catchy insults (your usual
anal references have tapered off... 'roids getting to you?) I put on a 1958
and 1968 Whites. The 1958 one is very significant as it is the first one
published by Radio TV Experimenter following the early 1957 death of Mr.
White, creating a laps of some 9 months in publication.

So, has nothing to do with your propensity to lie.

Try and obfuscate some more, you little pervert!

Generally, homophobes make lots of anal references and crack bad gay jokes.
Those that call others names like "pervert" and such tend to have a fear of
being revealed as one themselves. I don't answer to the name "pervert" in
any case, nor do I call persons I don't know by that name, either.

Perhaps it's because you are a prevert?

'Eddy', you are a frickin liar!

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


RHF wrote:

On Jul 7, 7:21 pm, m II wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
"Would Jesus Wear a Rolex?"

--Chet Atkins, Margaret Archer.

- Devil worshipping homosexuals wear Rolexes.
-
- mike

Mike that would explain the "Rolex" Logo
that is tattooed on your forehead. ~ RHF
http://www.golfresortsintl.com/images/rolex_logo.jpg

Rolex is good!

I sold 6 (six) of them at one time to a friend of mine in Trieste, Italia!


I'm guessing the place you bought them was an alleyway in the same
neighborhood.

No, actually I bought them from the ship's store whilst I was serving my
country.

At around the same time you were trying to avoid the same.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

So then what you posted http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm
is
not the
front page article as you claimed.

Shame on you, you worthless little faux Hispanic!

Caught again, 'Eduardo', you are a f00kin liar.

Who cares? The obit is more complete than the front page article, and, I
suppose this is why many years ago when I put the scan on the page I put
the
more complete one on... at some point, I can dig up the original and scan
it, too, although those things live at a different and more distant
house,
where I have more storage. The fact still remains, posted to a site or
no,
if you look for the PD for that date, you will find the NEWS story on the
front page.

Give it up, Eddy, and stop coming back making excuses... you're making
real
Hispanics look bad!


You are absolutely insane. A two day difference in reading a fuzzy JPEG from
11 years ago has no significance to any argument.

Bottom line is that that 'obit' did not appear on the front page of the
Cleveland Plain Dealer as you stated.

So once again, you were caught in a lie. Just one of so, so many over the past
50 years!

The issue here was to show
you that my mother was not a "socialite" but a very involved and dedicated
member of the community where she lived. A two day difference in a date is
of zero meaning in this. Nice try at obfuscating, though.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

So then what you posted http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm
is
not the
front page article as you claimed.

Shame on you, you worthless little faux Hispanic!

Caught again, 'Eduardo', you are a f00kin liar.

Who cares? The obit is more complete than the front page article, and, I
suppose this is why many years ago when I put the scan on the page I put
the
more complete one on... at some point, I can dig up the original and scan
it, too, although those things live at a different and more distant
house,
where I have more storage. The fact still remains, posted to a site or
no,
if you look for the PD for that date, you will find the NEWS story on the
front page.

Give it up, Eddy, and stop coming back making excuses... you're making
real
Hispanics look bad!


You are absolutely insane.

And you are a pathological liar, absolutely!

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

So then what you posted http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm is
not the
front page article as you claimed.

Shame on you, you worthless little faux Hispanic!

Caught again, 'Eduardo', you are a f00kin liar.

Who cares?

I do, because as usual, you made an outrageous claim. YOU CLAIMED that that
'obit' was on the FRONT PAGE of the Cleveland Plain Dealer. YOU were the one who
made the big productionof making THE CLAIM, and when proven to be a FALSE CLAIM,
you made a big production out that as well.

Bottom line, you piece of ****, is that you are once again proven to be a
PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!

The obit is more complete than the front page article, and, I
suppose this is why many years ago when I put the scan on the page I put the
more complete one on... at some point, I can dig up the original and scan
it, too, although those things live at a different and more distant house,
where I have more storage. The fact still remains, posted to a site or no,
if you look for the PD for that date, you will find the NEWS story on the
front page.

Kadaitcha Man wrote:

dxAce, ye bird-brained spendthrift of tongue, a knot you are of damned
blood suckers, ye produced:



David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

So then what you posted http://www.davidgleason.com/1946_Family.htm
is
not the
front page article as you claimed.

Shame on you, you worthless little faux Hispanic!

Caught again, 'Eduardo', you are a f00kin liar.

Who cares?

I do, because as usual, you made an outrageous claim. YOU CLAIMED that
that
'obit' was on the FRONT PAGE of the Cleveland Plain Dealer. YOU were the
one who
made the big productionof making THE CLAIM, and when proven to be a FALSE
CLAIM,
you made a big production out that as well.

Bottom line, you piece of ****, is that you are once again proven to be a
PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!

Oh, look! Foam!

LMAO!



--
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
news

"Anonymous" wrote in message
...

Jamming other stations with fat sloppy digital sidebands is indeed
'taking away' those other stations.

These "other stations" that you mention being taken away are not
stations that were ever protected in your area.

These stations were never meant to service your area. Radio signals go
on virtuallity till infinity. We have not protected stations to
infinity.

It's a cost vs. reward scenario. There are a few DX-ers who might not
be happy....but many more reap the benefits of HD radio.

Some of don't live in cities. We are involuntary DXers.

Where is this that you don't have any local radio service?

Again...it may disurb a few DX-ers...but brings much funtionality and
potential to the state of broadcasting.

A few whiners...but the majority get better radio.

The "majority" couldn't care less about IBOC.

They didn't care about FM either for the longest time.

Now they wouldn't be without it.

The radios they have work fine
or used to, before IBOC started up...

If you notice there is no outcry of complaints among radio listeners....only
here in geek groups.