TinyTim wrote:

On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:10:28 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Jul 27, 1:35 pm, Dave wrote:
dxAce wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

wrote:

Most likely the slanders won't work. The public has seen "Swift
Boating" liars before.
dxAce wrote:

Yep, and by telling the truth, they helped sink John "Fraud" Kerry!
Does that mean the blue-ribbon, bi-partisan Congressional panel telling
the truth that W lied us into a war will help sink George "Fraud" Bush?

George isn't running in this election; something the Democrats and Hussein seem
to forget.

The word "catharsis" leaps to mind.

http://www.thismodernworld.com/

A true statesman (and former editor of the Harvard Law Review) in
front of 200,000 people vs. the pathetic image of McCain in front of a
German restaurant. LOL.

Bush's popularity ratings have dropped from the high 90%s to the low
20%s.
The only reasonable explanation is the remaining dead-enders
supporting the ruined Republican brand are the slowest and dumbest
1/5th of Americans. Everyone else has caught on.

LOL
what does it take to convince the choir the emporer has no clothes?
what does it take to convince the choir That the GOP has morphed into
a poltical party replete as never seen before in US history:
Purveyors of
misinformation and propaganda
unbridled greed
censorship
militarism
deficits
bribery
extortion
retribution
theocracy
racism
corporatism
imperialism
cronyism
incompetence

Well, it certainly won't be Hussein Obama!

On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:38:13 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

No, he wasn't editor of the Harvard Law Review. He was on staff, but
not Editor. This is an exaggeration...a resume enhancement...not a
fact. One of several things he's not been entirely accurate about.




"February 6, 1990 br /
snip

"The job is considered the highest student position at Harvard Law School."

-New York Times



Interesting that he didn't publish during his time there...being what
one colleague refers to as 'the laziest president of Harvard Law Review.'


hmmm...you sound like an uppity white trash racist that also denies
that Jesus Christ was black.

Sadly, I suspect YOU have no social redeeming value.

Barak Obama is one of the smartest polticians to seek office in the
last 100 years. And he melds that with amazing management skills. The
political team he has put together is outstanding. The team G W Bush
lead also was strong and powerfull except it was replete with bigots,
racists, theocrats, and the greediest among us... and they have done,
arguably, extensive if not permanent damage to this nation and freedom
worldwide.

And his patriotism and fairness appear to be exemplary.

Hopefully he will get elected, restore this nations moral authority,
and restart the progression of the advancement of all human kind
towards international health, wealth and happiness.

Hopefully Obama will not stop the incarceration of the Bu****es for
their treason and war crimes. After all, they have brought this once
great nation to it's knees. Tom DeLay, Cheney, GWB, Karen Hughes, Karl
Rove, John Cornyn, Senator Inhofe, Alberto Gonzalez, Duncan Hunter,
Mitch McConnell to name just a few.... are in their.

CarlSwanson wrote:

On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:38:13 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

No, he wasn't editor of the Harvard Law Review. He was on staff, but
not Editor. This is an exaggeration...a resume enhancement...not a
fact. One of several things he's not been entirely accurate about.




"February 6, 1990 br /
snip

"The job is considered the highest student position at Harvard Law School."

-New York Times



Interesting that he didn't publish during his time there...being what
one colleague refers to as 'the laziest president of Harvard Law Review.'


hmmm...you sound like an uppity white trash racist that also denies
that Jesus Christ was black.

Sadly, I suspect YOU have no social redeeming value.

Barak Obama is one of the smartest polticians to seek office in the
last 100 years. And he melds that with amazing management skills. The
political team he has put together is outstanding. The team G W Bush
lead also was strong and powerfull except it was replete with bigots,
racists, theocrats, and the greediest among us... and they have done,
arguably, extensive if not permanent damage to this nation and freedom
worldwide.

And his patriotism and fairness appear to be exemplary.

Hopefully he will get elected, restore this nations moral authority,
and restart the progression of the advancement of all human kind
towards international health, wealth and happiness.

Hopefully Obama will not stop the incarceration of the Bu****es for
their treason and war crimes. After all, they have brought this once
great nation to it's knees. Tom DeLay, Cheney, GWB, Karen Hughes, Karl
Rove, John Cornyn, Senator Inhofe, Alberto Gonzalez, Duncan Hunter,
Mitch McConnell to name just a few.... are in their.

Hopefully, Hussein will merely be returned to the Senate where he can continue
doing much of nothing!

CarlSwanson wrote:

On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:38:13 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote:

Dave wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:

No, he wasn't editor of the Harvard Law Review. He was on staff, but
not Editor. This is an exaggeration...a resume enhancement...not a
fact. One of several things he's not been entirely accurate about.




"February 6, 1990 br /
snip

"The job is considered the highest student position at Harvard Law School."

-New York Times



Interesting that he didn't publish during his time there...being what
one colleague refers to as 'the laziest president of Harvard Law Review.'


hmmm...you sound like an uppity white trash racist that also denies
that Jesus Christ was black.

You ever been to Israel? Very few blacks there at all, and somehow, I doubt that
back in the time of 'Jesus', which by the way is/was not his real name, there were
many, if any at all. The chances of 'Jesus' being black are essentially slim to
none, and slim has left the arena.

But hey, if it helps your low self esteem to believe in what is essentially a
non-issue, then go for it.

dxAce wrote:


You ever been to Berlin, oh addled one? You ever get to see "Checkpoint Charlie" oh
addled one? You ever get to see "The Wall", oh addled one?

I have!


Good for you. That doesn't make your story true.

Dave wrote:

dxAce wrote:


You ever been to Berlin, oh addled one? You ever get to see "Checkpoint Charlie" oh
addled one? You ever get to see "The Wall", oh addled one?

I have!


Good for you. That doesn't make your story true.

It's a better story than you have, oh addled one!

D Peter Maus wrote:
..


So why weren't they heading for the exits?


Because there was free food and beer after his speech.

I don't really expect an answer, but sez who? All I can find is
speculation from the usual disinformation sites.

Dave wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
.


So why weren't they heading for the exits?


Because there was free food and beer after his speech.

I don't really expect an answer, but sez who?

You got an answer, you addled little 'tard boy.

All I can find is
speculation from the usual disinformation sites.

That's because you're addled!

D Peter Maus wrote:
Dave wrote:
dxAce wrote:
.

Actually, that would be the Democratic Party. Look at Chicago...
where Hussein is from!

He's from Kansas.

Bad news, sweetheart...his $1Megabuck+ home is in Hyde Park, a
neighborhood in Chicago. A home he financed with the help of convicted
racketeer Tony Resko.

That makes him a Chicago boy down to the soles of his Florscheims.

Something else that may have eluded your grasp: He's Senator from
Illinois...

Illinois is not in Kansas.

You must have gone to public school.

Where one lives is not necessarily where one is from. I live in
California but I'm from Arizona, which is where I spent my formative
years. Chicago politics seems like an excellent place to learn how to
be a dick, which is in part what I want a president to be.

RHF wrote:
On Jul 28, 5:06 pm, wrote:
- Jon Voight Concerned About Socialist Obama
- www.rense.com
- cuhulin

Jon Voight {Actor} : My Concerns for America
Obama Sowing Socialist Seeds in Young People
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/jul/28/voight/
-source- The Washington TimesMonday, July 28, 2008

What you call "socialism" is part of what the USA is about. The
military, for example, is socialist.