Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
In article , Dave wrote: Bruce Watson wrote: I nearly never monitored SSB stations. AFRTS is so low powered and utility stations really need scanning (a large, expensive desktop model) to be interesting. Ham traffic sounded all too monotonous. Squelch-based HF scanners don't work very well, regardless of the price. If you want to monitor lots of utes, you need a lot of radios. That's funny. I have several SW radios and HF scanners and the squelch works just fine on all of them. If you are in the voltage "scan" mode you miss calls. |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have two scanner radios.One of them is a Radio Shack Pro-91 150
channels radio and the other one is a Radio Shack 16 channels radio.I bought both of them at pawn shops.I paid $75.00 for my Pro-91, I don't remember how much I paid for the other one. cuhulin |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Your longest-lasting SW receiver? | Shortwave | |||
good long distance radio | Scanner | |||
FA: DX-390 AM/FM/Shortwave Portable Radio - Good Condition | Swap | |||
is shortwave radio good for my situation | Shortwave | |||
Who's good at shortwave radio repair? | Shortwave |