Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 6, 3:46*pm, wrote:
*It’s a dramatic idea that would change infrastructure reaching back to the *very roots of our industry. *A group made up primarily of broadcast *consulting engineers proposes a new use for TV Channels 5 and 6 in the *United States once their occupants migrate to digital. It recommends the *reallocation of part of that spectrum for the use of the country’s AM *stations. * The group, calling itself the Broadcast Maximization Committee, *recommends the conversion and migration of all AM stations over an extended *period of time and with digital transmissions only. * It also proposes *relocating the LPFM service to a portion of this spectrum and expanding the *NCE service into the adjacent portion. * The group made its proposal in a *filing to the FCC as part of the broadcast diversity proceeding (Docket *07-294). Comments in that proceeding were due this week. Other *organizations also have used the proceeding to discuss how the radio *spectrum should be structured; but these comments are likely to draw new *attention to the plight of AM stations and possible ways to help the *occupants of the senior band. * Engineering Consultant John Mullaney, a *proponent of using Channels 5 and 6 for radio, is part of BMC. Noting that *similar proposals to use that space for radio stations have been dismissed *by the commission as premature until the DTV transmission is done, the *group says the time is ripe for this proposal. *Although LPFMs and NCE *stations would benefit, AMs would gain the most, the group contends. The *proposal would move virtually all AM stations to the new band. * The *engineers lay out a plan under which all or most of the current AM *occupants would move and parts of the existing band would be designated for *users like municipalities and LPAM stations. *“For clear-channel (Class A) *AM stations we are proposing that the FCC will increase existing *protections on the AM band and possibly re-allocate the Class As that stay *in such a way that they will have enough protection from other AM stations *so that they can operate HD Radio day and night without creating *interference,” BMC member Bert Goldman told Radio World. *“This reduction *in AM noise will allow the remaining Class A stations to increase their *daytime and nighttime interference-free service by removing all other AM *stations.” *Each channel is anticipated to be structured in such a way that *the station may decide if they want greater robustness of signal (and *greater coverage like in rural locations) or less robustness and up to four *program channels. BMC is not proposing a digital standard at this time.. *BMC has also proposed a way to move the estimated 24 post-transition DTV *stations out of Channels 5 and 6. *The proposal is signed by Mullaney, *Goldman, Mark Lipp, Paul H. Reynolds, Joseph Davis, Clarence Beverage, *Laura Mizrahi, Lee Reynolds and Alex Walsh. * * Nuts and Bolts of BMC’s AM Migration Plan 8.01.2008 *Here are the nuts and bolts of the Broadcast Maximization Committee’s *proposal http://www.radioworld.com/pages/s.0100/t.14794.html to use old *TV spectrum for a migration of AM stations. *Under the BMC plan, AMs could *transition to the Channel 5/6 spectrum (100 channels 77.0 to 86.9 MHz) and *operate in the digital mode. In this way, AMs “can solve the current *digital problems they are experiencing, especially at night,” the group *states in its proposal. * BMC is proposing to: Extend the FM band to *include frequencies 76.1 to 87.7 MHz FM Expanded Band (EXB) with a 100 kHz *channel spacing, creating 117 new channels. The first eight channels (87.0 *to 87.7 MHz) would be reserved NCE channels since they are contiguous to *the current NCE band. The next 100 channels (77.0 to 86.9 MHz) would be *used to migrate AM stations to the proposed FM new EXB band channels, where *they would operate in digital mode. One channel on 76.9 MHz would be set *aside for NOAA DHS use nationwide. The last eight channels (76.1 to 76..8 *MHz) would be for LPFM use. The vacated AM band (540 to 1700 kHz) would *open up for multiple uses, including improved AM broadcast service or other *use. While the policies, standards and priorities for an AM migration would *need to be developed, BMC has offered a technical plan to show that its *proposal is possible and to encourage further discussions. * “Above all, AM *stations can become competitive, financially viable and immediately have *some hope for better days.” * * * * * Dang That's A Great Idea ! - seems like I read it before . . . RHF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Move Am's to channels 5&6? | Shortwave | |||
800/900 MHz Motorola Band Plan Channels | Scanner | |||
Radio Baltika To Expand RFE/RL Russian Broadcasts | Broadcasting | |||
US to expand radio broadcasts to North Korea | Shortwave | |||
dual band radios that transmit frs channels | General |