Naïve, foolish, ignorant of facts, unrealistically idealistic,
dreamers,
willfully in denial or deceptive. They hail from the ranks of the
chronically unhappy, the anarchists, the aspiring revolutionaries,
the
neurotics who are at war with life, the disaffected alienated from
government, corporations, and just about any and all institutions of
society.

Derives satisfaction from being anti-establishment. He finds perverse
gratification in aiding the forces that aim to dismantle an existing
order,
whatever it may be: an order he neither approves of nor he feels he
belongs
to.

He is conflicted and dishonest. He fails to look inside himself and
discover
the causes of his own problems and unhappiness while he readily
enlists
himself in causes that validate his distorted perception.

He is a master practitioner of scapegoating. He assigns blame to
others
while absolving himself of responsibility, has a long handy list of
candidates for blaming anything and everything, and by living a
distorted
life, he contributes to the ills of society.

He may even engage in willful misinformation and deception when it
suits
him.

The disease is http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=23947

On Aug 31, 8:47*am, Dave wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:34:28 -0700, RHF wrote:
- The disease is : LIBERALISM
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles...e.asp?ID=23947

Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder -by- Michael Savage
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal...ental_Disorder
*.

To demonise liberalism is to demonise the founding of the USA. *
Liberalism is at the root of Americanism. *Mike Weiner is a despicable
hate-monger.

President Ronald Reagan said he believed that "the very heart and soul
of conservatism is libertarianism."

Once again Dr. DaviD - PhD (Piled higher & Deeper) eschews historical
facts and injects the Neo-Communist propaganda lie.
The Liberalism equated with the founders of the U.S. is the farthest
from the reality behind the high-jacking of the term Liberalism by Neo-
Communists.

The correct term to describe Dr. DaviD - PhD is Liberal Socialist or
Neo-Liberal or Liberal Fascist. It does away with everything the
founders represent and injects the Neo-Communist philosophy under the
guise of Liberalism. Communists will always high-jack any cause which
will attract the largest gullable participants.

The term of modern Liberalism and the ilk of its followers is indeed
deserving of the distain heaped upon the term.

Read your history and know your facts to avoid the ills of the
Dr.DaviD - PhD disease!

"Dave" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:34:28 -0700, RHF wrote:
To demonise liberalism is to demonise the founding of the USA.
Liberalism is at the root of Americanism. Mike Weiner is a despicable
hate-monger.

In that historical era, the term liberalism meant liberty from monarchical
fascism.
Today, the term liberalism is the equivalent of social fascism.

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:25:43 -0500, bw wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:34:28 -0700, RHF wrote: To demonise liberalism
is to demonise the founding of the USA. Liberalism is at the root of
Americanism. Mike Weiner is a despicable hate-monger.

In that historical era, the term liberalism meant liberty from
monarchical fascism.
Today, the term liberalism is the equivalent of social fascism.

How so? Name a real liberal. It wasn't just the Crown; it was the
Church and the Aristocracy as well.

"Dave" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:25:43 -0500, bw wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:34:28 -0700, RHF wrote: To demonise liberalism
is to demonise the founding of the USA. Liberalism is at the root of
Americanism. Mike Weiner is a despicable hate-monger.

In that historical era, the term liberalism meant liberty from
monarchical fascism.
Today, the term liberalism is the equivalent of social fascism.

How so? Name a real liberal. It wasn't just the Crown; it was the
Church and the Aristocracy as well.

Obviously it changes. Democritus? Marcus Aurelius?
de Tocqueville? Hegel?? Mill??
Woodrow Wilson?
Today, just about anyone in a western society who can fabricate a cogent
paragraph is more liberal than the equivalent person of 1908.

bw wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message
m...
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:34:28 -0700, RHF wrote:
To demonise liberalism is to demonise the founding of the USA.
Liberalism is at the root of Americanism. Mike Weiner is a despicable
hate-monger.

In that historical era, the term liberalism meant liberty from monarchical
fascism.
Today, the term liberalism is the equivalent of social fascism.


The communists seem to disagree with you.

http://www.marxists.org/archive/trot...4/1944-fas.htm



mike

-
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
/ /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /
/ /\ \ /'Think Tanks Cleaned Cheap'/ /\ \/ /
/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/

Densa International©
For the OTHER two percent.



Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage,
I block all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail,
Google Groups or HOTMAIL address.
I also filter everything from a .cn server.


For solutions which may work for you, please check:
http://improve-usenet.org/

bw wrote:

Today, just about anyone in a western society who can fabricate a cogent
paragraph is more liberal than the equivalent person of 1908.

If literacy implies Liberalism, what exactly does illiteracy imply? And
why are they in the White House?




mike

--
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
/ /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /
/ /\ \ /'Think Tanks Cleaned Cheap'/ /\ \/ /
/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/

Densa International©
For the OTHER two percent.



Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage,
I block all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail,
Google Groups or HOTMAIL address.
I also filter everything from a .cn server.


For solutions which may work for you, please check:
http://improve-usenet.org/

On Aug 31, 11:04*pm, m II wrote:
bw wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message
om...
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:34:28 -0700, RHF wrote:
To demonise liberalism is to demonise the founding of the USA.
Liberalism is at the root of Americanism. *Mike Weiner is a despicable
hate-monger.

In that historical era, the term liberalism meant liberty from monarchical
fascism.
Today, the term liberalism is the equivalent of social fascism.

The communists seem to disagree with you.

http://www.marxists.org/archive/trot...4/1944-fas.htm

mike


Stand-Up like a Liberal and Blame Someone Else

On Aug 31, 8:52*pm, "bw" wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message

m...

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:25:43 -0500, bw wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
news:ceGdnSoGS6lJPSfVnZ2dnUVZ_vzinZ2d@earthlink. com...
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:34:28 -0700, RHF wrote: To demonise liberalism
is to demonise the founding of the USA. Liberalism is at the root of
Americanism. *Mike Weiner is a despicable hate-monger.

In that historical era, the term liberalism meant liberty from
monarchical fascism.
Today, the term liberalism is the equivalent of social fascism.

How so? *Name a real liberal. *It wasn't just the Crown; *it was the
Church and the Aristocracy as well.

Obviously it changes. Democritus? Marcus Aurelius?
de Tocqueville? Hegel?? Mill??
Woodrow Wilson?
Today, just about anyone in a western society who can fabricate a cogent
paragraph is more liberal than the equivalent person of 1908.

Woodrow Wilson was the first Liberal Fascist of Communist-Socialist
decent.

Read the history book which documents Liberal Fascism.
Listen to an interview with the author he
http://www.reason.com/blog/show/124122.html

Better yet,,, watch Tom & Jerry on the cartoon channel.
cuhulin