On Sep 4, 5:12*pm, Dave wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:48:53 +0000,D Peter Mauswrote:

.



* * One of the reasons so much erosion to the 2nd Amendment has
taken place is that so few actually have cared enough to exercise their
lawful rights that the politicians simply deemed them as expendable.
With no exercise, there is no outcry. Which leads directly to abuse.

I'm way more concerned about the 4th Amendment. *The 2nd is pretty safe
for now. *How does one exercise privacy?


Well, now that IS a good question. But do you think the 4th is the
best to protect that?? The 5th seems pretty important in that manner
as well. Eminent Domain appears to be a thing of the past. As does
the right to protect oneself from slander.

wrote:
On Sep 4, 5:12 pm, Dave wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:48:53 +0000,D Peter Mauswrote:

.



One of the reasons so much erosion to the 2nd Amendment has
taken place is that so few actually have cared enough to exercise their
lawful rights that the politicians simply deemed them as expendable.
With no exercise, there is no outcry. Which leads directly to abuse.
I'm way more concerned about the 4th Amendment. The 2nd is pretty safe
for now. How does one exercise privacy?


Well, now that IS a good question. But do you think the 4th is the
best to protect that?? The 5th seems pretty important in that manner
as well. Eminent Domain appears to be a thing of the past. As does
the right to protect oneself from slander.


The Constitution was designed to regulate the government, while giving
the people ultimate authority. The 4th Amendment says the government
cannot pry into your stuff, unless they have reasonable suspicion that
you are breaking the law, and can convince a court that the suspicion is
reasonable. Otherwise, they have to give you the benefit of the doubt.

The ultimate spirit of the 4th Amendment is that they leave you alone.

On Sep 4, 2:40*pm, Dave wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:11:35 -0700, RHF wrote:

In the US Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution they are
just Words
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...f_Independence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Constitution

As American Citizens We Have The Duty and Responsibility To Exercise
These Rights and Live Them Every Day.

live 'free' and right-on - amen ~ RHF

All people have inherent rights. *That's all the Declaration means. *You
don't have to "exercise" rights; *especially inherent ones. *You do have
to scream bloody murder when politicians try to erode them. *The
Declaration has no force of law; *it is a statement of reasons for
treasons.

- The framers made very certain that there was no mention
- of any mythical beings in the Constitution, being part of
- the Enlightenment and all.

"that they are Endowed by their Creator
with certain Unalienable Rights"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...f_Independence

Dave - Their CREATOR =Endowed= Unalienable Rights

d'oh! nothing 'mythical' about that
just plain english for all to read ~ RHF

On Sep 4, 2:40*pm, Dave wrote:
The framers made very certain that there was no mention of any mythical
beings in the Constitution, being part of the Enlightenment and all.
Some idiot will probably confuse the Decalartion of Independence with
the Constitution. They are two distinct documents separated by more
than 10 years.

On Sep 12, 8:32*am, " wrote:
On Sep 4, 2:40*pm, Dave wrote:

- - The framers made very certain that there was no mention
- - of any mythical beings in the Constitution,

United States Constitution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Constitution
A 'technical' Document detailing Government Structure
and Organization.

- being part of the Enlightenment and all.

Age of Enlightenment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment

- Some idiot will probably confuse the Decalartion of
- Independence with the Constitution. *They are two
- distinct documents separated by more than 10 years.

When the 'topic' is "Inalienable Rights" one cannot
dismiss the United States Bill of Rights. ~ RHF

The Foundation -1776- United States Declaration of Independence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...f_Independence
"Endowed by their Creator with certain Unalienable Rights
* Can't have a Creator without a so-called 'mythical being'

The Corner Stone -1787- United States Constitution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Constitution
A 'technical' Document detailing Government Structure
and Organization.

The Pillar -1791- United States Bill of Rights
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...Bill_of_Rights
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"
* Can't have 'Religion' and the 'Free Exercise Of' without
a so-called 'mythical being'.

go with the flow of history ~ RHF

On Sep 12, 5:23*pm, RHF wrote:
On Sep 12, 8:32*am, " wrote:

On Sep 4, 2:40*pm, Dave wrote:

- - The framers made very certain that there was no mention
- - of any mythical beings in the Constitution,

United States Constitutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Constitution
A 'technical' Document detailing Government Structure
and Organization.

- being part of the Enlightenment and all.

Age of Enlightenmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment

- Some idiot will probably confuse the Decalartion of
- Independence with the Constitution. *They are two
- distinct documents separated by more than 10 years.

When the 'topic' is "Inalienable Rights" one cannot
dismiss the United States Bill of Rights. ~ RHF

The Foundation -1776- United States Declaration of Independencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Declaration_of_Independence
"Endowed by their Creator with certain Unalienable Rights
* Can't have a Creator without a so-called 'mythical being'

The Corner Stone -1787- United States Constitutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Constitution
A 'technical' Document detailing Government Structure
and Organization.

The Pillar -1791- United States Bill of Rightshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"
* Can't have 'Religion' and the 'Free Exercise Of' without
a so-called 'mythical being'.

go with the flow of history ~ RHF
*.

* sorry * correstion *

When the 'topic' is "Inalienable Rights" one cannot dismiss
the United States Declaration of Independence . ~ RHF

The Foundation -1776- United States Declaration of Independence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...f_Independence
"Endowed by their Creator with certain Unalienable Rights
* Can't have a Creator without a so-called 'mythical being'

The Corner Stone -1787- United States Constitution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Constitution
A 'technical' Document detailing Government Structure
and Organization.

The Pillar -1791- United States Bill of Rights
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...Bill_of_Rights
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"
* Can't have 'Religion' and the 'Free Exercise Of' without
a so-called 'mythical being'.

go with the flow of history ~ RHF

RHF wrote:
On Sep 4, 2:40 pm, Dave wrote:
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:11:35 -0700, RHF wrote:

In the US Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution they are
just Words
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...f_Independence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Constitution
As American Citizens We Have The Duty and Responsibility To Exercise
These Rights and Live Them Every Day.
live 'free' and right-on - amen ~ RHF
All people have inherent rights. That's all the Declaration means. You
don't have to "exercise" rights; especially inherent ones. You do have
to scream bloody murder when politicians try to erode them. The
Declaration has no force of law; it is a statement of reasons for
treasons.

- The framers made very certain that there was no mention
- of any mythical beings in the Constitution, being part of
- the Enlightenment and all.

"that they are Endowed by their Creator
with certain Unalienable Rights"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...f_Independence

Dave - Their CREATOR =Endowed= Unalienable Rights

d'oh! nothing 'mythical' about that
just plain english for all to read ~ RHF
.
-ps- Creator [Deity] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creator_deity
.


The Declaration of Independence has nothing to do with the Constitution.

Religion has no place in politics; one is science, one is fantasy.

On Sep 13, 6:48*am, Dave wrote:

The Declaration of Independence has nothing to do with the Constitution.

Religion has no place in politics; *one is science, one is fantasy.

Tha amazing thing is that RHF not only embraced her status as an
ignorant idiot, but she went on to show her lack of integrity by
dishonestly attempting to fabricate a connection.

RHF wrote:


- Religion has no place in politics; one is science, one is fantasy.

Dave - That's your opinion -that- 'politics' is a 'science'.

Dave for those who 'Believe' and have 'Faith'
RE[A]LIGION Is As Real As Real Can Be ~ RHF
.
Religion is bull**** with a big shiny ribbon on it.

Why Most Jews Don't Like Sarah Palin.
www.rense.com/general83/palint.htm

I LOVE Sarah Palin.
cuhulin