Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RNW message site actually had someone APOLOGIZE for getting mad at
them for trashing SW broadcasts to North America. Ooooo does baby wantum botoo ?? Their survey is dubious at best. Appealing for people to E-mail them to ask they keep broadcasting is idiotic.Scientific evidence indicates at best only 10 % of those in a survey even bother to answer. What other media asks anyone, if you don't reply to our survey we may cut you off, and if result doesn't please the "bean counters" (those plagues upon a plague") we will slavishly follow their bidding and trash broadcasts.Your long SW schedule (RNW) can afford at least an hour a day English broadcast to North America, if not more. I can hardly wait for my local AM radio station to threaten me with a cutoff (go see us on the Web) Now isn't that incomprensibly stupid ?? Well it Ain,t going to happen either on AM, FM or Sirius or XM satellite, certainly not where English languge programming is concerned. BBC, DW and RNW are being big sucks crying in their beer. And I don't want to hear any of their guff that no enough people listen to SW, because it JUST AIN'T SO. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"SW4ever" wrote in message
... RNW message site actually had someone APOLOGIZE for getting mad at them for trashing SW broadcasts to North America. Ooooo does baby wantum botoo ?? And I don't want to hear any of their guff that no enough people listen to SW, because it JUST AIN'T SO. Of course its true. Radio listening in general is declining, SW listening in particular is about dead. Do you think all SW stations cutting back/dropping programs to North America is a coincidence? No one is listening in the U.S. anymore. Everyone is listening to crystal clear internet radio, satellite radio or ipods. No one cares about noisy, static filled, fading SW broadcasts anymore. That is 100 year old technology, and its time has passed. All of the big SW stations have nice, clear internet feeds now. Do what I do, listen there. For that real, nostalgic feeling, I feed the internet audio signal into one of my Part 15 AM transmitters, and rebroadcast it to my tube radios. Yes, it was cool 40 years ago when I got my first SW radio, and I now have more radios than you can imagine. The only thing I use them for nowadays is to receive my own broadcasts from my own transmitters, and listening to football or baseball games. Other than that, radio sucks big time these days. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Campbell wrote:
"SW4ever" wrote in message ... RNW message site actually had someone APOLOGIZE for getting mad at them for trashing SW broadcasts to North America. Ooooo does baby wantum botoo ?? And I don't want to hear any of their guff that no enough people listen to SW, because it JUST AIN'T SO. Of course its true. Radio listening in general is declining, SW listening in particular is about dead. Do you think all SW stations cutting back/dropping programs to North America is a coincidence? No one is listening in the U.S. anymore. Everyone is listening to crystal clear internet radio, satellite radio or ipods. No one cares about noisy, static filled, fading SW broadcasts anymore. That is 100 year old technology, and its time has passed. All of the big SW stations have nice, clear internet feeds now. Do what I do, listen there. For that real, nostalgic feeling, I feed the internet audio signal into one of my Part 15 AM transmitters, and rebroadcast it to my tube radios. Yes, it was cool 40 years ago when I got my first SW radio, and I now have more radios than you can imagine. The only thing I use them for nowadays is to receive my own broadcasts from my own transmitters, and listening to football or baseball games. Other than that, radio sucks big time these days. PBS/NPR "Public" Educational FM Radio Stations should copy the CBC {Canada} and re-broadcast some of the major International Shortwave Radio Broadcasters in their 10PM to 5AM "Over-Night" Time Slot : Note - PBS/NPR has de-facto Programming Control over 2964 "Public" FM Radio Stations http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/totals/bt080630.html =IF= Only 10% ~300 "Public" FM Radio Stations carried the "Today's World News from Your World Over-Night"© Program and all the major {Top 100] US Metro Areas were covered then America would be getting the Message of Shortwave via the FM Radios in their Homes and Cars and at Work during the NightShift. Shortwave as a Media may be indeed Dying -but- The Un-Cut Message of Shortwave can expanded in the USA via the Public FM Radio Stations. BBC = England/UK RNW + DW + RFI + REE = EuroLand CBC + RMI North America Radiobrás +RHC = South America Carribean CRI + NHK = Asia VOR = Russian Federation AIR = India Channel Africa = Africa KOL + Radio Cairo = Middle East http://www.dxzone.com/catalog/Shortw.../Broadcasters/ CBC Radio One http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBC_Radio_One CBC Radio "Overnight" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBC_Radio_Overnight shortwave radio it's about hearing the un-cut and un-edited message from the source and hearing many sources ~ RHF |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
dxAce wrote: Bob Campbell wrote: "SW4ever" wrote in message ... RNW message site actually had someone APOLOGIZE for getting mad at them for trashing SW broadcasts to North America. Ooooo does baby wantum botoo ?? And I don't want to hear any of their guff that no enough people listen to SW, because it JUST AIN'T SO. Of course its true. Radio listening in general is declining, SW listening in particular is about dead. Do you think all SW stations cutting back/dropping programs to North America is a coincidence? No one is listening in the U.S. anymore. Everyone is listening to crystal clear internet radio, satellite radio or ipods. No one cares about noisy, static filled, fading SW broadcasts anymore. That is 100 year old technology, and its time has passed. All of the big SW stations have nice, clear internet feeds now. Do what I do, listen there. For that real, nostalgic feeling, I feed the internet audio signal into one of my Part 15 AM transmitters, and rebroadcast it to my tube radios. Yes, it was cool 40 years ago when I got my first SW radio, and I now have more radios than you can imagine. The only thing I use them for nowadays is to receive my own broadcasts from my own transmitters, and listening to football or baseball games. Other than that, radio sucks big time these days. So, we can figure on you not showing up here again, boy? We can only hope. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RHF wrote:
Note - PBS/NPR has de-facto Programming Control over 2964 "Public" FM Radio Stations They do not. Several L. A. area NPR stations run the World Service overnight, without any mandates, from Roy Fisk or anyone else. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
RHF wrote: Note - PBS/NPR has de-facto Programming Control over 2964 "Public" FM Radio Stations They do not. Several L. A. area NPR stations run the World Service overnight, without any mandates, from Roy Fisk or anyone else. Dave - D'Oh! Da World Service from the BBC is only One Voice and is Not the Many Voices of the World. The BBC-WS is a good start; but it is just a start. Start 1. BBC = England/UK + 2. RNW & DW & RFI & REE = EuroLand + 3. CBC & RMI North America + 4. CRI & NHK = Asia + 5. VOR = Russian Federation + 6. AIR = India + 7. Channel Africa = Africa + 8. Radiobrás & RHC = South America Carribean + 9. KOL + Radio Cairo = Middle East http://www.dxzone.com/catalog/Shortw.../Broadcasters/ Network Example : CBC Radio One http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBC_Radio_One Programming Example : CBC Radio "Overnight" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBC_Radio_Overnight again shortwave radio it's about hearing the un-cut and un-edited message from the source and hearing 'many' sources around the world ~ RHF |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
Get lost looser. Well, the word you really want is 'loser', not 'looser' (the opposite of tighter) that you have used. Usually, I don't want to be the "Spelling Police", but it's just too hard to resist when someone accuses another of being dumb, stupid, whatever, and then uses the wrong word in -their- reply. Keep it up and others just might suspect that -you- are the "looser". ;-) P.S. Before you fire off a nasty reply, please appreciate that I am just trying to save you the embarrassment of shooting yourself in the foot. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Around here, Mississippi Polka Music gals run around naked in the front
yards. cuhulin |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There go my little doggy again.She rounding up her little doggy monster
squeaky toys and droppin them down my side on her couch.Spoiled rotten little doggy,,,,,,, www.cattledog.com www.cattledog.com Flyball cuhulin |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
your rant | Antenna | |||
your rant | Shortwave | |||
So Much For THAT Rant.... | Policy | |||
Theological Rant | Antenna | |||
Rant | Homebrew |