In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

BCBlazysusan wrote:

I wished the internet had a rule that you couldn't post on
usenet unless you used your real name...

Do you mean to say your birth certificate says "BCBLazysusan"?

If it doesn't, isn't that just a -little- bit hypocritical of you? Or is
it the old "do as you say, not do as you do" routine? :-)

Does your's have Billy Boy on it? It should hypocrite.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

****ant B HO needs to go back to where he came from, Kenya.
cuhulin

I never said drugs are bad.Although I never mess around with drugs.When
I get an upset stomach, I stir up a big spoonful of baking soda in a
glass of water.When I get a headache I take two Bayer aspirins.That's
enough drugs for me!
cuhulin

www.wxusa.com It is about 54 degrees here in Jackson,Mississippi
right now, and quite windy outside.y'all Numbskulls who voted for Obama,
I wish y'all lots of luck.y'all are going to need it!
cuhulin

On Nov 15, 11:09*am, Bob Dobbs wrote:
RHF wrote:
oops - but then the libeerals and democrats who
trashed the 'office of us President' when it was
'bush' are now demanding r-e-s-p-e-c-t for that
very same 'office of us President' now that it
is 'obama' once again the two faces of 'liberals'
and democrats ~ RHF

Your displayed confusion is pathetically amusing.
The presidency was besmirched by the presence of Bush who held all
American principles in disregard, from the constitution we all live
under to the cleanliness of the air and sky we all live under.
If, and at this point seems unlikely, Obama acts as immaturely naive and
reckless as has Bush, he too will earn similar odium.
The office of the president (CIC) should be one of respect, but in
reality is only held to the level of respect brought to it by whomever
occupies it at the time.

--

Operator Bob
Echo Charlie 42

Bob Dobbs,

Thats a "Tar-Baby" Argument
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tar_baby

The Liberals, Democrats and Media have spent 8 Years
making a "Tar-Baby" out of President George "W" Bush
and there-by Attacking 'The Office of the US Presidency'.

But they all will be crying "Give President Barack
Hussein Obama a Chance to Do Good" and will level
Instant Charges of RACISM against any US Citizen
who dares to say something bad or negative about
'their' wonderful Liberal Democrat US President
Barack Hussein Obama.

Remember the Golden Rule :
It Applies to US Presidents Too :
1st - Do Unto The Other Party's President
While He Is In Office :
2nd - As You Would Like The Other Party To Do
Unto Your President When He Is In Office.

It is often said that : Pay Back Is a B-i-t-c-h
-and- Often Politics Is All About P-a-y-B-a-c-k

as with live - in politics what . . .
comes around goes around ~ RHF

RHF wrote:

You still don't get it, do you?

Obama (and his supporters almost unanimously) proved that the highest
office can be attained by taking, and staying on, the high road. He
never once personally attacked his opponent. He never got mean-spirited
and nasty, and therefore his term will not have that taint of original sin.

You, conversely, continue to wallow in the ugliest psychotic muck of
old-school A****er dirty tricks personal politics, not only demeaning
yourself, but the Republic itself.

On Nov 15, 4:16*pm, RHF wrote:

The Liberals, Democrats and Media have spent 8 Years
making a "Tar-Baby" out of President George "W" Bush
and there-by Attacking 'The Office of the US Presidency'.

Your misunderstanding or intentional misstatement of fact is amusing.
Anyone can tell the difference between attacking the man and attacking
the office. Are you really unable to tell the difference, or do you
think the rest of us are so stupid we won't notice?

Tartarus

On Nov 15, 9:34 am, Billy Burpelson wrote:
BCBlazysusan wrote:
I wished the internet had a rule that you couldn't post on
usenet unless you used your real name...
Do you mean to say your birth certificate says "BCBLazysusan"?

If it doesn't, isn't that just a -little- bit hypocritical of you? Or is
it the old "do as you say, not do as you do" routine? :-)

BCBlazysusan wrote:

Huh? I've used my name before. I thought BCBLazysusan would be
appropriate for this group. ColdSteelGregg for a knives newsgroup etc.
I have used my name for years, I've actually said my name was Gregg in
here before. I suppose you missed it maybe? Now why would I post what
I did before if I hadn't used my name, knowing that someone would call
me on it. You can apologize to me later. ;-)

Gregg? Well, that really narrows it down. Gregg Smith or Gregg Jones?
With 10 or 20 million 'Greggs' in the country, that's just about as
anonymous as "BCBLazysusan".

So, to summarize, when you said "I wished the internet had a rule that
you couldn't post on usenet unless you used your real name", I took that
to mean your -entire- name, not just 'Joe' or 'Fred'...or 'Gregg'. If
you just meant first name, your entire point would be meaningless.

You can apologize to me later. ;-)

Bob Dobbs wrote in news:491f1cab.6022859
@chupacabra:

The presidency was besmirched by the presence of Bush who held all
American principles in disregard, from the constitution we all live
under to the cleanliness of the air and sky we all live under.

Jim Alder wrote:

Re-mouthing the same hatemongering lies about Bush won't prove your point.
It just proves ours.

Huh? Lies? What lies?

As a matter of *public record*, Bush is/was the most
anti-environmentalist President ever. And we DID lose more civil rights
under the 'Patriot Act' than any time in our history. Bush *sneered* at
our Constitution. ("Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush
screamed back. "It's just a goddamned piece of paper!")

If, and at this point seems unlikely, Obama acts as immaturely naive and
reckless as has Bush, he too will earn similar odium.

Liar. Just as Clinton was revered and protected - porking interns was his
'private life' and not to be spoke of,

Again, huh? His private life WAS 'spoke of'. They tried to impeach him
for it. What planet were you on when that happened? (Clue for you: they
could not have have tried impeachment -unless- people 'spoke of' his
private life).

Further clue: Most people in this country (you obviously excepted), do
think that Clinton lying about his blow job was bad -- but *not nearly*
as bad as Bush/Cheney/Wolfowitz lying us into a bogus war that cost tens
of thousands of lives and a trillion dollars. Compared to that, lying
about a garden variety blow job seems pretty harmless.

Final clue for you:

People weren't voting -for- Obama, they were voting -against- Bush and
what he stood for.

I know you're not happy about the Republican party getting its biggest
spanking in history, but try and take it like a man. The Repubs earned
it, fair and square.

On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:44:17 -0500, Billy Burpelson
wrote:


Bob Dobbs wrote in news:491f1cab.6022859
@chupacabra:

The presidency was besmirched by the presence of Bush who held all
American principles in disregard, from the constitution we all live
under to the cleanliness of the air and sky we all live under.

Jim Alder wrote:

Re-mouthing the same hatemongering lies about Bush won't prove your point.
It just proves ours.

Huh? Lies? What lies?

As a matter of *public record*, Bush is/was the most
anti-environmentalist President ever. And we DID lose more civil rights
under the 'Patriot Act' than any time in our history. Bush *sneered* at
our Constitution. ("Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush
screamed back. "It's just a goddamned piece of paper!")

You jerks keep saying that yet not one single time has anyone provided
any case where anyone has actually proven that their rights had been
violated. And you still haven't.
Anti environmental? Oh yeah when he promoted alternative fuels like
ethanol or hydrogen you all bitched and moaned perpetually. Most
likely due to him not being a democrat.
Why have pollution levels decreased in the last 8 years if he is so
out to destroy the earth?


If, and at this point seems unlikely, Obama acts as immaturely naive and
reckless as has Bush, he too will earn similar odium.

Liar. Just as Clinton was revered and protected - porking interns was his
'private life' and not to be spoke of,

Again, huh? His private life WAS 'spoke of'. They tried to impeach him
for it. What planet were you on when that happened? (Clue for you: they
could not have have tried impeachment -unless- people 'spoke of' his
private life).

Idiot. Jim is referring to the main stream press not the congress.
Try to pay better attention.

Further clue: Most people in this country (you obviously excepted), do
think that Clinton lying about his blow job was bad -- but *not nearly*
as bad as Bush/Cheney/Wolfowitz lying us into a bogus war that cost tens
of thousands of lives and a trillion dollars. Compared to that, lying
about a garden variety blow job seems pretty harmless.

Yeah lying to congress and the grand jury is no big deal is it.
Telling a blad faced liw to the face of the American people wh8ile
wagging your finger at them at the same time is really cool yes?
Perjury shouldn't be a crime at all yes?
****ing baboon.

Final clue for you:

People weren't voting -for- Obama, they were voting -against- Bush and
what he stood for.

I know you're not happy about the Republican party getting its biggest
spanking in history, but try and take it like a man. The Repubs earned
it, fair and square.

Voting against someone is not wise in any stretch of the term.
You fools should have found someone to vote for instead of
concentrating on the childish ideology that "anything must be better".
When Obama's socialist agenda comes to bloom and you find yourself
bitten in the ass just remember. It's what YOU wanted.






Regards


§tarkiller©




"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Sen. Clinton said.
"We're saying that for America to get back on track,
we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you.
We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."