Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
At a time when cultural production has been exploding, fueled by
increasingly diverse and participatory new media, we would be stepping back toward the days when the broadcast media were a centralized and cozy public-private partnership. [ Like a Fannie & Freddie MAC and Socialist anti-iBiquity diktators. ] [...] Incidentally, Trinity Church, the controversial house of worship that Obama0 attended until May, is affiliated with the United Church of Christ, a body that has been heavily involved with the media reform movement. During the last few years, the church has urged the FCC to limit product placement on television, to refuse to renew the licenses of stations that don't offer enough children's programming, to let more low-power radio stations on the air, to block media consolidation, and—yes—to restore the fairness doctrine. [...] http://www.reason.com/news/show/129228.html |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Fairness Doctrine isn't being restored, Obama is against it, and
almost no (if any) senator or representative backs it. It's just fear mongering by far-right radio talk show host to rile up their audiences. The far right talk show hosts know that keeping their audience ****ed off and in fear also keeps them tuned in. So they got to keep coming up with stuff. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 7, 12:03*pm, wrote:
The Fairness Doctrine isn't being restored, Obama is against it, and almost no (if any) senator or representative backs it. It's just fear mongering by far-right radio talk show host to rile up their audiences. The far right talk show hosts know that keeping their audience ****ed off and in fear also keeps them tuned in. So they got to keep coming up with stuff. Of course, you didn't read a single line in the artcile. Probably because you have the typical Liberal Fascist attention span of a 3 year old. Heil Hitler! [get used to it] |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Dec 7, 1:28 pm, wrote: Of course, you didn't read a single line in the artcile. Probably because you have the typical Liberal Fascist attention span of a 3 year old. Why would I have to? There are 100's of articles about the "Fairness Doctrine" all over the web. I've read all the arguments. Again the republican radio talk show hosts are harping on this to **** off their audience and get them to listen. The far right talk pulled the same scare tactics when Clinton was elected in 1992. Of cour$e we all know the real rea$on why con$servative talk $how ho$t would be oppo$ed to the Fairne$$ doctrine. The Fairness Doctrine isn't coming back. Remember, fear is what the far-rights uses to keep their audience, not fact. Even if it did, it would not affect talk shows. Talk has been primarily conservative since it's inception, and was so during the reign of the doctrine. I don't recall a single talk station (and I used to listen to several back in the day) that fell afoul of the doctrine. The stations that did were quite overtly pushing a particular candidate or issue during an election cycle. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 12:26*am, "Brenda Ann" wrote:
Even if it did, it would not affect talk shows. Talk has been primarily conservative since it's inception, and was so during the reign of the doctrine. I don't recall a single talk station (and I used to listen to several back in the day) that fell afoul of the doctrine. I remember the same. I remember WCBM radio in Baltimore going to a far- right talk format around 1983. The only thing I really remember about the Fairness Doctrine was on TV when their producer would give a political opinion, and then someone from the public would be given equal time to oppose that opinion. Gone are the days of Rush Limbaugh being on shortwave... remember that? The question is though, why has AM liberal talk radio been such an epic failure? Myself I think it's two fold, most liberals get their news and opinions elsewhere & AM radio listening audience tends to be older and/of blue collar. I've noticed a trend of AM stations also going to sports talk over the past decade or so. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 10:11*am, wrote:
On Dec 8, 12:26*am, "Brenda Ann" wrote: Even if it did, it would not affect talk shows. Talk has been primarily conservative since it's inception, and was so during the reign of the doctrine. I don't recall a single talk station (and I used to listen to several back in the day) that fell afoul of the doctrine. I remember the same. I remember WCBM radio in Baltimore going to a far- right talk format around 1983. The only thing I really remember about the Fairness Doctrine was on TV when their producer would give a political opinion, and then someone from the public would be given equal time to oppose that opinion. Gone are the days of Rush Limbaugh being on shortwave... remember that? The question is though, why has AM liberal talk radio been such an epic failure? Myself I think it's two fold, most liberals get their news and opinions elsewhere & AM radio listening audience tends to be older and/of blue collar. I've noticed a trend of AM stations also going to sports talk over the past decade or so. You've read it all all right - LOL - uh huh. Just more obfuscation by your Liberal Fascist propaganda LIES! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"Fairness" run amok - Censoring Conservative Radio | Shortwave | |||
WGN's Dr. Milton J. Rosenberg interviews Brian Anderson about the"Fairness" Doctrine | Shortwave | |||
The Doctrine of Balaam | Shortwave |