On Mar 8, 6:06*am, dave wrote:
- - ~ RHF wrote:
- - Dave -oops- ? WHAT IF ? - It is determined that
- - Barack 'Hussein' Obama were 'in-fact' NOT
- - Eligible {Qualified} to be the US President ?
- - - - - As Prescribed by the US Constitution.

- Too late now. *He has been sworn.

Dave -reality-check- An Oath of Office Is To . . .
Up-Hold "The Law" -and- Not To Abrogate The Law [.]

Remember that the US Constitution -is-in-fact-
"The Law of the Land" -and- Applies To All.

-or- Dave Are You Now Saying US Presidents
Are Above "The Law" -or- Just Barack Obama
'IS' Above "The Law" ?

classic liberal thinking - it boggles the mind ~ RHF

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Michael W. Bryant, the totally discredited dufus who once claimed to
have
a
PhD,
wrote:

On Mar 6, 3:37�pm, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Mar 6, 5:24�am, Mike wrote:

On Mar 4, 8:23�pm, Telamon

wrote:
Political and cultural ties sure but I don't know any conservatives
that
think the economic treaties between the USA and China are a good
thing.
I remember Ronald Reagan suggesting that trade pacts with China would
eventually make sense. You should also remember that it was Reagan
who
got the ball rolling on NAFTA and it was King George, the First, that
pretty much was responsible for finishing the negotiations on NAFTA.
- Clinton just signed it shortly after being elected.

MWB 'just' More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.

President Bill Clinton Signed the NAFTA Treaty
INTO LAW [.]
-ps- He could have Vetoed It
-but- He 'Choose' to Sign the NAFTA Treaty Into Law.

Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]

mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF
�.
RHF,

As usual, you're just choosing to be difficult. Though Clinton
signed NAFTA (and, yes,
he took grief from the labor unions for doing so), but it was the
Reagan and Bush administrations that were responsible for the
negotiations during the 1980's.

The responsibility for NAFTA was clearly shared by both Democrats
and Republicans. Reagan was famous for his prediction that
countries that trade with each other have seldom fought wars. Yes,
even the great Conservative supported Free Trade Pacts. The
Republican Party has always been bigger supporters of such pacts.

What, RHF, no URLs to support your insanity this time? That clearly
says something..
What about your insanity, PhDufus?

After all, any 'tard boy who'd lie about having a PhD certainly must
have a screw or two loose.
You want insanity, this is insanity.

Obama's Radicalism Is Killing the Dow

By MICHAEL J. BOSKIN

"It's hard not to see the continued sell-off on Wall Street and the
growing fear on Main Street as a product, at least in part, of the
realization that our new president's policies are designed to radically
re-engineer the market-based U.S. economy, not just mitigate the
recession and financial crisis.

The illusion that Barack Obama will lead from the economic center has
quickly come to an end. Instead of combining the best policies of past
Democratic presidents -- John Kennedy on taxes, Bill Clinton on welfare
reform and a balanced budget, for instance -- President Obama is
returning to Jimmy Carter's higher taxes and Mr. Clinton's draconian
defense drawdown."

Go read the rest of it he
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html

The obomination is looking more like Carter II everyday.

Failed capitalism and its supporters did Wall Street in NOT Barack
Obama. He has the unfortunate job of picking up the pieces.
The stock market disagrees with you in strongest possible terms. It
didn't like Jimmy's policies and it doesn't think the obomination's
policies are any better.

The boys on Wall Street are the ones to be held the most accountable.
Their free ride with Georgie and his clan are over and now they have to
own up. Small wonder they are sh*tting bricks.

The boys on wall street are not responsible for the wealth destroying
actions of the obomination. I know I'm one of the "boys" as you call
them. The market has been down since the obomination won the election
due to his promises to destroy capitalism as we know it. The obomination
speeches since he assumed office have done nothing but inspire fear in
the markets. Those are the facts like them or not.


Those are not the facts if you take a look at the DJIA over the last
year. The greatest drops occurred with GWB in power. And those are the
facts like them or not.

http://www.djaverages.com/

JB

~ RHF wrote:
On Mar 7, 4:02 pm, John Barnard wrote:
~ RHF wrote:
On Mar 6, 7:53 pm, John Barnard wrote:
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dxAce wrote:
Michael W. Bryant, the totally discredited dufus who once claimed to have a
PhD,
wrote:
On Mar 6, 3:37 pm, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Mar 6, 5:24 am, Mike wrote:
On Mar 4, 8:23 pm, Telamon

wrote:
Political and cultural ties sure but I don't know any conservatives
that
think the economic treaties between the USA and China are a good
thing.
I remember Ronald Reagan suggesting that trade pacts with China would
eventually make sense. You should also remember that it was Reagan who
got the ball rolling on NAFTA and it was King George, the First, that
pretty much was responsible for finishing the negotiations on NAFTA.
- Clinton just signed it shortly after being elected.
MWB 'just' More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.
President Bill Clinton Signed the NAFTA Treaty
INTO LAW [.]
-ps- He could have Vetoed It
-but- He 'Choose' to Sign the NAFTA Treaty Into Law.
Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]
mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF
.
RHF,
As usual, you're just choosing to be difficult. Though Clinton
signed NAFTA (and, yes,
he took grief from the labor unions for doing so), but it was the
Reagan and Bush administrations that were responsible for the
negotiations during the 1980's.
The responsibility for NAFTA was clearly shared by both Democrats
and Republicans. Reagan was famous for his prediction that
countries that trade with each other have seldom fought wars. Yes,
even the great Conservative supported Free Trade Pacts. The
Republican Party has always been bigger supporters of such pacts.
What, RHF, no URLs to support your insanity this time? That clearly
says something..
What about your insanity, PhDufus?
After all, any 'tard boy who'd lie about having a PhD certainly must
have a screw or two loose.
You want insanity, this is insanity.
Obama's Radicalism Is Killing the Dow
By MICHAEL J. BOSKIN
"It's hard not to see the continued sell-off on Wall Street and the
growing fear on Main Street as a product, at least in part, of the
realization that our new president's policies are designed to radically
re-engineer the market-based U.S. economy, not just mitigate the
recession and financial crisis.
The illusion that Barack Obama will lead from the economic center has
quickly come to an end. Instead of combining the best policies of past
Democratic presidents -- John Kennedy on taxes, Bill Clinton on welfare
reform and a balanced budget, for instance -- President Obama is
returning to Jimmy Carter's higher taxes and Mr. Clinton's draconian
defense drawdown."
Go read the rest of it he
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html
- - The obomination is looking more like Carter II everyday.
- Failed capitalism and its supporters did Wall Street
- in NOT Barack Obama. He has the unfortunate job
- of picking up the pieces.
-
- JB
- - (OT) : The Obama Regime's ObamaNomics©
- - US Unemployment Rate Jumps to 8.1% Worst Since 1983
- - http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...WlnEIj58U&refe...
- - * US Job Losses topped 600,000 for a Third Straight Month,
- - the first time that's happened in government record-keeping
- - dating to 1939. - - - It's ObamaNomics©
- - http://www.newsday.com/services/news...saturday/news/...
- - * ObamaNomics© 13.4% Unemployment Far Worse for Blacks
- - - - - It's ObamaNomics©
- - http://www.suntimes.com/business/146...ploy07.article
- - * U.S. Unemployment Reaches 26-year High
- - - - - It's ObamaNomics©
- - http://www.bizjournals.com/stlouis/s...2/daily79.html
- - .
- - FWIW the 'Blame Bush' Game has become
- - the 'Blame Obama' Game -cause- Bush Ain't
- - the President Anymore and Obama "IS"
- - .
- - It's Happening On Obama's Presidential Watch So . . .
- - It's His Problem [.]
- - It's His Responsibility [.]
- - It's His Fame or Blame [.]
- - .

- You're a useless moron
- please do something useful and become worm food.
-
- JB

"JB" - 'useless moron' & 'worm food'
.
- - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - -
[: To Liberal Name Calling :]
ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name Calling*.
* They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional - rotfl ~ RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...8979fbe8546cfa
.
The Obama Regime's ObamaNomics©
Are Killing {Down 30%} the US Markets
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...ccb045a3477ffb
.
(OT) : The Obama Regime's ObamaNomics© :
US Unemployment Rate Jumps to 8.1% Worst Since 1983
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...6e2934afe7d70b
.
More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.
History Will Show President Bill Clinton
Was At The Very End Responsible for
the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [.]
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...7368c1c9582977
.
President Obama Turn-Off That Tela-Promter ! ©
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...0263779a9766ed
.
Impeach Obama Now - He's Bad For America and The World Economy
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...5e0eb69c261e7d
.
Reverse ObamaNomics© Every Time Obama Mentions
Rush Limbaugh's Name - Limbaugh's Pay Goes Up !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...a0f4a32ced4e28
.
Democrats & Liberals Talking About Rush Limbaugh's
Weight Just Proves That Barack 'Hussein' Obama Is
A Light Weight President
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...2734159d567079
.
At the Weigh-In : Feel-the-Rush Lim-Bah
-versus- Bar-Rack-the-Oba-MAaaa
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...950b0e3f533efd
.
Dave -proclaims- - That Is The Height Of Irresponsibility. {ROTFL}
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...17ef8d79ff6992
.
Dave -proclaims- Anyone Who Spreads Rumors
That Question The President's Legitimacy Is
Undermining National Security
- In the Age of Obama-R-Us©
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...73c6be52c60f39
.
.

Sorry but I trend along conservative lines. But I still have no
problem calling you an useless moron who warps words to fit his own
pathetic interpretations.

JB

In article ,
dave wrote:

~ RHF wrote:


Dave -oops- ? WHAT IF ? - It is determined that
Barack 'Hussein' Obama were 'in-fact' NOT
Eligible {Qualified} to be the US President ?
- - - As Prescribed by the US Constitution.

Too late now. He has been sworn.

Yeah, I've sworn at him many times myself. I'm sure many people have
done the same.

Someone needs to hack the obama-prompter.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Michael W. Bryant, the totally discredited dufus who once claimed to
have
a
PhD,
wrote:

On Mar 6, 3:37�pm, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Mar 6, 5:24�am, Mike wrote:

On Mar 4, 8:23�pm, Telamon

wrote:
Political and cultural ties sure but I don't know any
conservatives that think the economic treaties between the
USA and China are a good thing.
I remember Ronald Reagan suggesting that trade pacts with
China would eventually make sense. You should also remember
that it was Reagan who got the ball rolling on NAFTA and it
was King George, the First, that pretty much was
responsible for finishing the negotiations on NAFTA.
- Clinton just signed it shortly after being elected.

MWB 'just' More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.

President Bill Clinton Signed the NAFTA Treaty INTO LAW [.]
-ps- He could have Vetoed It -but- He 'Choose' to Sign the
NAFTA Treaty Into Law.

Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]

mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF �.
RHF,

As usual, you're just choosing to be difficult. Though
Clinton signed NAFTA (and, yes,
he took grief from the labor unions for doing so), but it
was the
Reagan and Bush administrations that were responsible for the
negotiations during the 1980's.

The responsibility for NAFTA was clearly shared by both
Democrats and Republicans. Reagan was famous for his
prediction that countries that trade with each other have
seldom fought wars. Yes, even the great Conservative
supported Free Trade Pacts. The Republican Party has always
been bigger supporters of such pacts.

What, RHF, no URLs to support your insanity this time? That
clearly says something..
What about your insanity, PhDufus?

After all, any 'tard boy who'd lie about having a PhD
certainly must have a screw or two loose.
You want insanity, this is insanity.

Obama's Radicalism Is Killing the Dow

By MICHAEL J. BOSKIN

"It's hard not to see the continued sell-off on Wall Street and
the growing fear on Main Street as a product, at least in part,
of the realization that our new president's policies are
designed to radically re-engineer the market-based U.S.
economy, not just mitigate the recession and financial crisis.

The illusion that Barack Obama will lead from the economic
center has quickly come to an end. Instead of combining the
best policies of past Democratic presidents -- John Kennedy on
taxes, Bill Clinton on welfare reform and a balanced budget,
for instance -- President Obama is returning to Jimmy Carter's
higher taxes and Mr. Clinton's draconian defense drawdown."

Go read the rest of it he
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html

The obomination is looking more like Carter II everyday.

Failed capitalism and its supporters did Wall Street in NOT
Barack Obama. He has the unfortunate job of picking up the
pieces.
The stock market disagrees with you in strongest possible terms.
It didn't like Jimmy's policies and it doesn't think the
obomination's policies are any better.

The boys on Wall Street are the ones to be held the most
accountable. Their free ride with Georgie and his clan are over
and now they have to own up. Small wonder they are sh*tting
bricks.

The boys on wall street are not responsible for the wealth
destroying actions of the obomination. I know I'm one of the "boys"
as you call them. The market has been down since the obomination
won the election due to his promises to destroy capitalism as we
know it. The obomination speeches since he assumed office have done
nothing but inspire fear in the markets. Those are the facts like
them or not.


Those are not the facts if you take a look at the DJIA over the last
year. The greatest drops occurred with GWB in power. And those are
the facts like them or not.


http://www.djaverages.com/


I don't know what charts you are looking at. Are you saying you exist in
an alternate universe?

I got out of the market a over a year ago now once I saw the Dem's were
likely to take over the white house with all the negative implications
involved in that. My crystal ball didn't show me that the Dem's would
also have control of both houses. Over the course of the election year
the Dem's picked the most liberal Senator to run for office. This looked
pretty bad for the economy and it sure turned out that way. This is the
perfect political storm against the stock market. You may have voted for
it but we are both going to pay for it. I think you should pay my share
for the damage the abomination has done and has yet to do.

How ironic that even Putin thinks the obominator is stupid for following
socialist policies.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Mar 8, 2:44*pm, John Barnard wrote:
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*dxAce wrote:

Michael W. Bryant, the totally discredited dufus who once claimed to
have
a
PhD,
wrote:

On Mar 6, 3:37 pm, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Mar 6, 5:24 am, Mike wrote:

On Mar 4, 8:23 pm, Telamon

wrote:
Political and cultural ties sure but I don't know any conservatives
that
think the economic treaties between the USA and China are a good
thing.
I remember Ronald Reagan suggesting that trade pacts with China would
eventually make sense. You should also remember that it was Reagan
who
got the ball rolling on NAFTA and it was King George, the First, that
pretty much was responsible for finishing the negotiations on NAFTA.
- Clinton just signed it shortly after being elected.

MWB 'just' More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.

President Bill Clinton Signed the NAFTA Treaty
INTO LAW [.]
-ps- He could have Vetoed It
-but- He 'Choose' to Sign the NAFTA Treaty Into Law.

Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]

mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF
.
RHF,

As usual, you're just choosing to be difficult. Though Clinton
signed NAFTA (and, yes,
*he took grief from the labor unions for doing so), but it was the
Reagan and Bush administrations that were responsible for the
negotiations during the 1980's.

The responsibility for NAFTA was clearly shared by both Democrats
and Republicans. Reagan was famous for his prediction that
countries that trade with each other have seldom fought wars. Yes,
even the great Conservative supported Free Trade Pacts. The
Republican Party has always been bigger supporters of such pacts.

What, RHF, no URLs to support your insanity this time? That clearly
says something..
What about your insanity, PhDufus?

After all, any 'tard boy who'd lie about having a PhD certainly must
have a screw or two loose.
You want insanity, this is insanity.

Obama's Radicalism Is Killing the Dow

By MICHAEL J. BOSKIN

"It's hard not to see the continued sell-off on Wall Street and the
growing fear on Main Street as a product, at least in part, of the
realization that our new president's policies are designed to radically
re-engineer the market-based U.S. economy, not just mitigate the
recession and financial crisis.

The illusion that Barack Obama will lead from the economic center has
quickly come to an end. Instead of combining the best policies of past
Democratic presidents -- John Kennedy on taxes, Bill Clinton on welfare
reform and a balanced budget, for instance -- President Obama is
returning to Jimmy Carter's higher taxes and Mr. Clinton's draconian
defense drawdown."

Go read the rest of it he
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html

The obomination is looking more like Carter II everyday.

Failed capitalism and its supporters did Wall Street in NOT Barack
Obama. He has the unfortunate job of picking up the pieces.
The stock market disagrees with you in strongest possible terms. It
didn't like Jimmy's policies and it doesn't think the obomination's
policies are any better.

The boys on Wall Street are the ones to be held the most accountable.
Their free ride with Georgie and his clan are over and now they have to
own up. Small wonder they are sh*tting bricks.

The boys on wall street are not responsible for the wealth destroying
actions of the obomination. I know I'm one of the "boys" as you call
them. The market has been down since the obomination won the election
due to his promises to destroy capitalism as we know it. The obomination
speeches since he assumed office have done nothing but inspire fear in
the markets. Those are the facts like them or not.

Those are not the facts if you take a look at the DJIA over the last
year. The greatest drops occurred with GWB in power. And those are the
facts like them or not.

http://www.djaverages.com/

JB

That was a durect result of FEAR of the ObamaNation©
and the onslaught of ObamaNomics© leading to the
ObamaNization© of the US Ecomomy has caused the
US Stock Market to T-A-N-K !
1Obama
2 Obamas
3 Obamas
Four Years of Obama Can We Take Anymore ?

Obamavilles.
www.rense.com/general85/obamville.htm
cuhulin

On Mar 8, 10:37*pm, wrote:

- Obamavilles.
- www.rense.com/general85/obamville.htm
- cuhulin

Cuhulin - ObamaVilles© Is Right

Kevin Johnson, the African-American Mayor of
http://www.cityofsacramento.org/
Sacramento, CA is considering putting-up an
ObamaVille© (Tent City) for the City's Poor
and Homeless.
http://www.knx1070.com/Tent-City--Sa...to--CA/3975040

ObamaVilles© can also mean the Endless Number
of Empty Foreclosed Homes in a House track or
Neighborhood. This are the Vacant Relics of what
was America's Dying Middle Class now ever
increasing as a results of ObamaNomics©

Either way an ObamaVille© Ain't Good News
-cause- they are a hard physical testament to
the reality that Americans are Broke and Homeless
due to the current Economic Conditions brough
on by the failed policies of ObamaNomics© and
the ObamaNization© of America's Wealth and
Productive Capacity.

The Obama-Regime© has made the Financial
Failure of the US Government {Devaluation of
the Dollar} and the Collapse of the US Economy
{Hyper Inflation} and all too real future reality for
the vast majority of working Americans. ~ RHF

In article telamon_spamshield-6C7774.17402108032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
dave wrote:

~ RHF wrote:


Dave -oops- ? WHAT IF ? - It is determined that
Barack 'Hussein' Obama were 'in-fact' NOT
Eligible {Qualified} to be the US President ?
- - - As Prescribed by the US Constitution.

Too late now. He has been sworn.

Yeah, I've sworn at him many times myself. I'm sure many people have
done the same.

Someone needs to hack the obama-prompter.



Wow, you guys are really desperate, aren't you Telemundo?

As usual, but lamer.
--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-6C7774.17402108032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
dave wrote:

~ RHF wrote:


Dave -oops- ? WHAT IF ? - It is determined that
Barack 'Hussein' Obama were 'in-fact' NOT
Eligible {Qualified} to be the US President ?
- - - As Prescribed by the US Constitution.

Too late now. He has been sworn.

Yeah, I've sworn at him many times myself. I'm sure many people have
done the same.

Someone needs to hack the obama-prompter.



Wow, you guys are really desperate, aren't you Telemundo?

It's a joke.

As usual, but lamer.

You didn't get it because you are a joke.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California