How to Silence Talk Radio

http://townhall.com/columnists/Frank...try_to_deat h

ObaMa0 Destroyed 45% of World's Wealth. Now he will destroy 45% of
the world's free radio.

obamao.[RUDENESS and vulgarity wrote:

ObaMa0 Destroyed 45% of World's Wealth.

45%? The whole WORLD? In only seven lousy WEEKS???? (For someone who
thinks O is so incompetent, you sure give him a lot of credit!)

And predecessor Bush gets a free pass for the last eight YEARS????

(Especially since the Bush loving, Republican Wall Street Journal says
this mess started on Bush's watch).

BWAHAHAHAhaha.... donkey brain, you're a riot! :-)

wrote:
How to Silence Talk Radio

http://townhall.com/columnists/Frank...try_to_deat h

ObaMa0 Destroyed 45% of World's Wealth. Now he will destroy 45% of
the world's free radio.

It isn't really "wealth" if it can be so easily decimated by a politician.

wrote in message
...
How to Silence Talk Radio

http://townhall.com/columnists/Frank...try_to_deat h

ObaMa0 Destroyed 45%

Wall Street banksters destroyed your 401(k), horse**** for brains.

On Mar 12, 12:20*pm, wrote:
How to Silence Talk Radio

http://townhall.com/columnists/Frank...how_to_silence...

ObaMa0 Destroyed 45% of World's Wealth. *Now he will destroy 45% of
the world's free radio.

You are *really*, *REALLY* stupid.

Congratulations!

Pramer

On Mar 12, 2:20*pm, wrote:
How to Silence Talk Radio

http://townhall.com/columnists/Frank...how_to_silence...

ObaMa0 Destroyed 45% of World's Wealth. *Now he will destroy 45% of
the world's free radio.

looks like he thinks the world started on jan 20 2009.

guess he forgot about the previous 8 years

On Mar 13, 1:59*am, "Ayn't Rand"
wrote:
wrote in message

...

How to Silence Talk Radio

http://townhall.com/columnists/Frank...how_to_silence...

ObaMa0 Destroyed 45%

Wall Street banksters destroyed your 401(k), horse**** for brains.

Yep like the very liberal democrat Bernie Madoff...who gave most of
his campaign money to left wing candidates...if you do some fact
checking on Wall St. the vast majority are of the liberal democratic
ilk.

Billy Burpelson wrote:

obamao.[RUDENESS and vulgarity wrote:

ObaMa0 Destroyed 45% of World's Wealth.

45%? The whole WORLD? In only seven lousy WEEKS???? (For someone who
thinks O is so incompetent, you sure give him a lot of credit!)

And predecessor Bush gets a free pass for the last eight YEARS????

(Especially since the Bush loving, Republican Wall Street Journal says
this mess started on Bush's watch).

BWAHAHAHAhaha.... donkey brain, you're a riot! :-)

Everything started to crash and burn in 2007 when Pelosi and Reid took
over the Congress.
-

A LIBERAL'S thought on RELIGION.

"The first requisite for the happiness of the people is
the abolition of religion."
-Karl Marx

Billy Burpelson wrote:

obamao.[RUDENESS and vulgarity wrote:

ObaMa0 Destroyed 45% of World's Wealth.
45%? The whole WORLD? In only seven lousy WEEKS???? (For someone who
thinks O is so incompetent, you sure give him a lot of credit!)

And predecessor Bush gets a free pass for the last eight YEARS????

(Especially since the Bush loving, Republican Wall Street Journal says
this mess started on Bush's watch).

BWAHAHAHAhaha.... donkey brain, you're a riot! :-)

B.O. Jr. wrote:

Everything started to crash and burn in 2007 when Pelosi and Reid took
over the Congress.

Well, first of all, 2007 WAS on Bush's watch, totally refuting donkey
brain's contention that Obama did it in 7 -weeks- (which you will recall
was the original thread).

Pelosi and Reid notwithstanding, what happened to Bush's veto power? Why
didn't Bush "just say no"?

A LIBERAL'S thought on RELIGION.

"The first requisite for the happiness of the people is
the abolition of religion."
-Karl Marx

I'm not sure why you brought up religion here, but seeing as you did...

I thought Marx said "Religion is the opiate of the masses". Wouldn't
opiates -add- to "the happiness of the people"? Marx seems to be a
little inconsistent here. ;-)

"Billy Burpelson" wrote in message
...
I'm not sure why you brought up religion here, but seeing as you did...

I thought Marx said "Religion is the opiate of the masses". Wouldn't
opiates -add- to "the happiness of the people"? Marx seems to be a little
inconsistent here. ;-)


I believe that his quote was referring to the negative aspect of opiate use:
the dumbing down of the people through their use.