Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And you can read about it here on the NASA web site.
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum.htm -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
And you can read about it here on the NASA web site. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum.htm What more could they possibly add? The next max will be a short one. So what? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Billy Burpelson wrote:
Telamon wrote: And you can read about it here on the NASA web site. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum.htm dave wrote: What more could they possibly add? That we may be experiencing the beginning of another "Maunder Minimum"? There is nothing to indicate such an event. We're just seeing a below average cycle coming up. Ask your AGW deniers to calculate the trends without 1998 (an anomaly due to ocean currents) and you'll see that the heat is on. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Carter, K8VT, known Marxist dufus posing as 'Billy Burpelson', wrote: Telamon wrote: And you can read about it here on the NASA web site. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum.htm dave wrote: What more could they possibly add? That we may be experiencing the beginning of another "Maunder Minimum"? And some dumbass Marxist such as yourself will try to pin that on GWB too! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 2, 10:36*am, dxAce wrote:
Carter, K8VT, known Marxist dufus posing as 'Billy Burpelson', wrote: Telamon wrote: And you can read about it here on the NASA web site. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum.htm dave wrote: - - - What more could they possibly add? - - That we may be experiencing the beginning - - of another "Maunder Minimum"? - And some dumbass Marxist such as yourself - will try to pin that on GWB too! OT Just For The Fun of It ! :-) Nah GWB spoke so little and said hardly nothing in his 8-years as the US President : That in-fact we had a period of Global Cooling. However - BHO the Great Leader of Global Warming is the #1 ObamaSpeaker© {Bloviator Maximus} and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloviate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximus in just a few months as the US President he has spoke and misspoke {via the ObamaPrompter©} every day and said so ever much time and time again : That now in-fact we have a re-newed period of Global Warming in excess due to all the Hot Air BHO has generated. It does appear that President Barack 'Hussein' Obama has been BARACKING© at the Moon ! ~ RHF |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
~ RHF wrote:
On Apr 2, 9:27 am, dave wrote: Billy Burpelson wrote: Telamon wrote: And you can read about it here on the NASA web site. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum.htm dave wrote: What more could they possibly add? - - That we may be experiencing the beginning - - of another "Maunder Minimum"? The Maunder Minimum http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_minimum The Little Ice Age (LIA) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age While not a true ice age, the term was introduced into scientific literature by François E. Matthes in 1939.[1] Climatologists and historians working with local records no longer expect to agree on either the start or end dates of this period, which varied according to local conditions. Some confine the Little Ice Age to approximately the 16th century to the mid 19th century.[2] It is generally agreed that there were three minima, beginning about 1650, about 1770, and 1850, each separated by slight warming intervals.[3] It is not certain if the LIA was a global phenomenon. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) describe areas affected by the LIA; "Evidence from mountain glaciers does suggest increased glaciation in a number of widely spread regions outside Europe prior to the 20th century, including Alaska, New Zealand and Patagonia (Grove and Switsur, 1994). However, the timing of maximum glacial advances in these regions differs considerably, suggesting that they may represent largely independent regional climate changes, not a globally-synchronous increased glaciation" with "a modest cooling of the Northern Hemisphere during this period of less than 1°C," and suggests that "current evidence does not support globally synchronous periods of anomalous cold or warmth over this timeframe, and the conventional terms of 'Little Ice Age' and Medieval Warm Period appear to have limited utility in describing trends in hemispheric or global mean temperature changes in past centuries. " . . |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote: Telamon wrote: And you can read about it here on the NASA web site. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum.htm dave wrote: What more could they possibly add? That we may be experiencing the beginning of another "Maunder Minimum"? Possibly. All indicators are down not just the sunspots. Time will tell. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: Telamon wrote: And you can read about it here on the NASA web site. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum.htm dave wrote: What more could they possibly add? That we may be experiencing the beginning of another "Maunder Minimum"? Possibly. All indicators are down not just the sunspots. Time will tell. The drop in solar wind is kind of scary. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: Telamon wrote: And you can read about it here on the NASA web site. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum.htm dave wrote: What more could they possibly add? That we may be experiencing the beginning of another "Maunder Minimum"? Possibly. All indicators are down not just the sunspots. Time will tell. The drop in solar wind is kind of scary. Hopefully, this will just last another couple of years at most otherwise we will be spending the rest of our lives going through another "Maunder Minimum". -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Telamon wrote:
In article , dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , Billy Burpelson wrote: Telamon wrote: And you can read about it here on the NASA web site. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum.htm dave wrote: What more could they possibly add? That we may be experiencing the beginning of another "Maunder Minimum"? Possibly. All indicators are down not just the sunspots. Time will tell. The drop in solar wind is kind of scary. Hopefully, this will just last another couple of years at most otherwise we will be spending the rest of our lives going through another "Maunder Minimum". If the solar winds get much weaker we won't be around to worry about some stupid glaciers. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SolderSmoke #30: Solar pwr, IRF 510 amp, QST 50, BITX20, rockbound rigs, solar min? | Boatanchors | |||
SolderSmoke #30: Solar pwr, IRF 510 amp, QST 50, BITX20, rockbound rigs, solar min? | Homebrew | |||
DX on 10 meters? Solar min looking like solar max? | Dx | |||
Solar Minimum in 2006? | Shortwave | |||
FA: Swan 350 $15 minimum bid! | Boatanchors |