Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
I was at the beach yesterday and enjoyed spectacular shortwave reception. When I got back home after that I tried to listen to shortwave in my house but I didn't have a very good time of it. I was wondering if there is a way to listen to shortwave in your house. I have heard of something called an attic loop? Would that work well? Are those easy to install and are they fairly inexpensive? Thanks! Andrew. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 10, 1:15*am, MacaualyFlower
wrote: Hello, I was at the beach yesterday and enjoyed spectacular shortwave reception. *When I got back home after that I tried to listen to shortwave in my house but I didn't have a very good time of it. I was wondering if there is a way to listen to shortwave in your house. *I have heard of something called an attic loop? *Would that work well? *Are those easy to install and are they fairly inexpensive? Thanks! Andrew. Wearing a tin foil hat works everytime! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On May 10, 1:15 am, wrote: Hello, I was at the beach yesterday and enjoyed spectacular shortwave reception. When I got back home after that I tried to listen to shortwave in my house but I didn't have a very good time of it. I was wondering if there is a way to listen to shortwave in your house. I have heard of something called an attic loop? Would that work well? Are those easy to install and are they fairly inexpensive? Thanks! Andrew. A loop can be expensive. There are also build-your-own solutions that can be quite economical. It's all going to depend on your level of technical skill, and your willingness to expand your skills and technical understanding. Your problems in at-home listening are based on the levels of noise generated by items in the house, as well as signal loss resulting from siding and other construction materials, ground and other clutter. The composite result of attenuated signal at the antenna, and higher noise levels from sources in the home make for some pretty suckular listening. The best solution is an external antenna. More signal and less noise. A dramatic difference is possible. Easiest would be a random wire through a 9:1 transformer to a well shielded and grounded coaxial transmission line to your radio. This can be all the improvement you need. Easily deployed. Easily concealed, if that's an issue. Loops are very good solutions. They can offer a level of noise immunity. A properly selected diameter can provide less directional reception at HF frequencies, making for simpler operation. That said, smaller loops tend to be of lower gain, requiring amplification to not only boost signal levels, but to overcome losses in the transmission line for better noise figures. Such loops, like the Wellbrooks, can run you a few hundred bucks just to get one in the building. You build one for less, but that will require some technical understanding of loops, transmission lines and the field of antennae in general. Loops in the attic....not the best solution. Mostly because you're still in the building where noises are generated. Level of noise in your receiver is proportional to the proximity of the antenna to the source. Outdoors, away from the building is a dramatically better way to go. You may be surprised where at the sources of your troublesome noise. Computers, routers, and printers, are horrid offenders, of course. But the rectifier bridges in audio amps (Crowns are notorious for this), HD tv sets (on or off), cable/U-verse boxes, noises on the A/C line, and even some ground legs can all be noise sources. Some, like rectifier bridges can be quieted with capacitors across rectifier junctions to soak up the switching transient. Others, more difficult. But there are always solutions to improve, if not eliminate some noises. ARRL publishes a terrific book on antennae, antenna theory, and practical designs and construction tips. And there are always sources, like this group, where the technical knowledge is available to help you track down and maim, if not kill, noise. Dig in. Getting your hands working is a lot of fun. p |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are many Yahoo groups that will also be sources of good information. Just do a search of "shortwave radio groups" on Yahoo and you will find excellent information for your problems. I belong to about 12 different ones, includong antenna and radio specific ones. Hope this helps. Greg, KE5LDO
Quote:
__________________
Extra Class Volunteer Examiner ARRL Instructor |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "MacaualyFlower" wrote in message ... Hello, I was at the beach yesterday and enjoyed spectacular shortwave reception. When I got back home after that I tried to listen to shortwave in my house but I didn't have a very good time of it. I was wondering if there is a way to listen to shortwave in your house. I have heard of something called an attic loop? Would that work well? Are those easy to install and are they fairly inexpensive? I have this antenna strung under the eaves and it works great. Seems it would do just as well in the attic: http://www.grove-ent.com/ANT8.html |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 10 May 2009 16:05:37 GMT, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote: On May 10, 1:15 am, wrote: Hello, I was at the beach yesterday and enjoyed spectacular shortwave reception. When I got back home after that I tried to listen to shortwave in my house but I didn't have a very good time of it. I was wondering if there is a way to listen to shortwave in your house. I have heard of something called an attic loop? Would that work well? Are those easy to install and are they fairly inexpensive? Thanks! Andrew. A loop can be expensive. There are also build-your-own solutions that can be quite economical. It's all going to depend on your level of technical skill, and your willingness to expand your skills and technical understanding. Your problems in at-home listening are based on the levels of noise generated by items in the house, as well as signal loss resulting from siding and other construction materials, ground and other clutter. The composite result of attenuated signal at the antenna, and higher noise levels from sources in the home make for some pretty suckular listening. The best solution is an external antenna. More signal and less noise. A dramatic difference is possible. Easiest would be a random wire through a 9:1 transformer to a well shielded and grounded coaxial transmission line to your radio. This can be all the improvement you need. Easily deployed. Easily concealed, if that's an issue. Loops are very good solutions. They can offer a level of noise immunity. A properly selected diameter can provide less directional reception at HF frequencies, making for simpler operation. That said, smaller loops tend to be of lower gain, requiring amplification to not only boost signal levels, but to overcome losses in the transmission line for better noise figures. Such loops, like the Wellbrooks, can run you a few hundred bucks just to get one in the building. You build one for less, but that will require some technical understanding of loops, transmission lines and the field of antennae in general. Loops in the attic....not the best solution. Mostly because you're still in the building where noises are generated. Level of noise in your receiver is proportional to the proximity of the antenna to the source. Outdoors, away from the building is a dramatically better way to go. You may be surprised where at the sources of your troublesome noise. Computers, routers, and printers, are horrid offenders, of course. But the rectifier bridges in audio amps (Crowns are notorious for this), HD tv sets (on or off), cable/U-verse boxes, noises on the A/C line, and even some ground legs can all be noise sources. Some, like rectifier bridges can be quieted with capacitors across rectifier junctions to soak up the switching transient. Others, more difficult. But there are always solutions to improve, if not eliminate some noises. ARRL publishes a terrific book on antennae, antenna theory, and practical designs and construction tips. And there are always sources, like this group, where the technical knowledge is available to help you track down and maim, if not kill, noise. Dig in. Getting your hands working is a lot of fun. p It might help to narrow down the advice if the original poster could tell us what sort of radio he wants to connect an antenna to. From the post, it sounds like a portable. If so, 30 feet of wire out the window might be more than enough. (Still not gonna sound like the beach, but at least there's less sand to get in the radio.) -- Col. I.P. Yurin Commissariat of Internal Security Stakhanovite Order of Lenin (1937) Hero of Socialist Labor (1939) |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You will always get better reception on a beach than in an inland
house. These antenna ideas might help but there is also a reason why there are so many different opinions on antennas, because what works for someone doesn't work for someone else. A big factor is the location of your house. You could have power lines or other household appliances interfering with SW reception. Experiment around and I wish you luck. Did you also try your shortwave on different days or nights? Propagation can differ greatly from day to day,. What radio are you using? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 10, 9:05*am, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote: * On May 10, 1:15 am, * wrote: Hello, I was at the beach yesterday and enjoyed spectacular shortwave reception. *When I got back home after that I tried to listen to shortwave in my house but I didn't have a very good time of it. I was wondering if there is a way to listen to shortwave in your house. *I have heard of something called an attic loop? *Would that work well? *Are those easy to install and are they fairly inexpensive? Thanks! Andrew. * *A loop can be expensive. There are also build-your-own solutions that can be quite economical. It's all going to depend on your level of technical skill, and your willingness to expand your skills and technical understanding. * *Your problems in at-home listening are based on the levels of noise generated by items in the house, as well as signal loss resulting from siding and other construction materials, ground and other clutter. The composite result of attenuated signal at the antenna, and higher noise levels from sources in the home make for some pretty suckular listening. * *The best solution is an external antenna. More signal and less noise. A dramatic difference is possible. * *Easiest would be a random wire through a 9:1 transformer to a well shielded and grounded coaxial transmission line to your radio. This can be all the improvement you need. Easily deployed. Easily concealed, if that's an issue. * *Loops are very good solutions. They can offer a level of noise immunity. A properly selected diameter can provide less directional reception at HF frequencies, making for simpler operation. That said, smaller loops tend to be of lower gain, requiring amplification to not only boost signal levels, but to overcome losses in the transmission line for better noise figures. Such loops, like the Wellbrooks, can run you a few hundred bucks just to get one in the building. You build one for less, but that will require some technical understanding of loops, transmission lines and the field of antennae in general. * *Loops in the attic....not the best solution. Mostly because you're still in the building where noises are generated. Level of noise in your receiver is proportional to the proximity of the antenna to the source. Outdoors, away from the building is a dramatically better way to go. * *You may be surprised where at the sources of your troublesome noise. *Computers, routers, and printers, are horrid offenders, of course. But the rectifier bridges in audio amps (Crowns are notorious for this), HD tv sets (on or off), cable/U-verse boxes, noises on the A/C line, and even some ground legs can all be noise sources. Some, like rectifier bridges can be quieted with capacitors across rectifier junctions to soak up the switching transient. Others, more difficult. But there are always solutions to improve, if not eliminate some noises. * *ARRL publishes a terrific book on antennae, antenna theory, and practical designs and construction tips. * *And there are always sources, like this group, where the technical knowledge is available to help you track down and maim, if not kill, noise. * *Dig in. Getting your hands working is a lot of fun. * *p Wow everyone! Thank you for your help. I used to work at Radio Shack and when I was there, I bought myself a "Grundig S350." I'm not sure what your opinions are of this radio but it was one of the best purchases I have ever made. I love this radio. I am looking at the back of it right now and it has a place for "AM/SW ANT" and a ground. It looks like the old speaker wire "clip in" things. I'm not sure I described the "clip in" things really well. A hole with a switch that pinches the wire in place. I guess one of the concerns I would have is finding a way to get the antenna line from outside of the house to inside. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Bob Dobbs wrote: MacaualyFlower wrote: I guess one of the concerns I would have is finding a way to get the antenna line from outside of the house to inside. Through a window Or drill a hole, and put a feed through tube in. dxAce Michigan USA |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna for shortwave reception | Antenna | |||
Sony shortwave repair, and reception question-- | Shortwave | |||
Sangean ATS-505 Receiver - Improving your Shortwave Radio Reception with an External Shortwave Listener's (SWL) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
AM reception question | Shortwave | |||
Reception question | Scanner |