Bushcraftgregg wrote:





I think he had that "doctor" as his personal physician,
probably paid him a couple million a year to be with him.

The doctor was hired by AEG, the promoter.

On Jun 27, 10:00*am, dave wrote:
Bushcraftgregg wrote:

I think he had that "doctor" as his personal physician,
probably paid him a couple million a year to be with him.

The doctor was hired by AEG, the promoter.

Yeah. I heard that. Apparently MJ was going
to anyone he could find to get his drugs.

Bushcraftgregg wrote:
On Jun 26, 11:29 pm, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote:
"Bushcraftgregg" wrote in message
...
On Jun 26, 5:05 pm, wrote:
The police should investigate all the people who have extorted Michael
Jackson, over the years.
Drugs didn't kill Michael Jackson. The people who slandered Jackson
burdened his heart -he lasted far longer than anybody similarily
attacked.
I can say this much, and of course it is just my opinion.
But from everything I know and have studied
for sixteen years about deception, be
it from body language or the voice and
recently through handwriting analysis.
There was absolutely NOTHING, ziltch -
nada that led me to believe that he was
nothing but honest in answering allegations
of child molestation.
Ninety nine per cent of the time when someone
is either being deceptive or just flat out lying
there is some sign, be it body language or even the tonality of
specific words depending on what the question was or actual physical
signs are visible.
If this was truly the case and IMO he was completely
innocent of those charges, MANY MANY people
owe this man an apology.
I, too have huge doubts about the allegations against Jackson.
There are two possibilities he
1) Jackson did nothing, and these two families were gold diggers looking to
get rich quick through allegations of sexual misconduct that are difficult
to impossible to defend against.
OR
2) Jackson did molest the kids, and the parents are still gold diggers, and
some of the worst parents on the planet. Would any parent that cared about
their child let someone slide on molesting their child just because someone
gave them money to keep quiet?
Hell, yes...please don't be naive, Brenda. The radio actor that played
'Leroy' (with the high voice) on "The Great Gildersleeve" show was
playing the part of a 12 year old kid when in reality he was 40. Why?
Because he started out as a child radio actor and when his voice started
to change, his mother had him castrated. Every now and again, you hear
in the news about a mother selling her baby for a few hundred bucks. So,
for 21 million dollars, the rotten parents might go along with a little
of Jackson's "touchy-feely" with their kid.



Then there's the fact that the last case actually went to the jury, and he
still wasn't convicted.
I'll let God sort it out. Only Him, the kids and Jackson know the truth
anyway.
Possibly you and the other poster are overlooking something painfully
obvious -- Jackson's own words from his own lips on a national TV
interview saying it was OK to get in bed with young kids. On the
national interview, I'm sure he didn't intend it to be overtly sexual,
but it certainly was somewhere between pretty bizarre at the least and a
de facto admission of guilt at the worst.

As parents of two children, our kids may have gotten in bed with us on
rare occasions (when they were sick or scared of a particularly violent
thunderstorm) up to the age of two or so -- but I don't think any of
Jackson's child "visitors" were that young, to say nothing of the fact
that he wasn't their parent.

Where there is smoke, there is fire?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Joe. Make no mistake about it. I "totally" know
where you are coming from.

But you are looking at MJ's tv interview (about
'sharing your bed with a child' ) the way people
like you and I and I am sure the majority of everyone
else in the group looks at things.

You have to remember who we are speaking about
here. You are talking about an adult who NEVER
got to experience childhood. Think about that.
That is almost more than you or anyone else in this
group can comprehend. I know I can't. I really thought about that the
other day, trying to "put myself
there." I know mentally it made me feel extremely sad
and I was just putting myself in a state to try to experience what he
had to have felt.shaking my head. Pretty sad.

Now picture yourself being blessed with the talent
that he had and the utter disdain he felt for his dad.
Now picture having all the monies you could ever want and finally
being rid of your dad. I think he was so afraid he was starting
to...or going to look like his father that
he had all that cosmetic surgery, and he went to far.

Is it any wonder he surrounded himself with children? They were the
only ones he felt he
could trust and then even THAT was taken away from him.

He did a good job of dangling an infant over a balcony. I'd consider
that a good reason to keep kids away from him.



I don't know. Like I said, I'm pretty studied in the subject of
deception and I'm telling you....there was
NOTHING in any of his interviews that even gave a clue of impropriety.
Like BA said, "let God sort it out."

But maybe now those children can have some semblance of a normal life.
Just my take.