Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
dave wrote: Bob Dobbs wrote: dave wrote: Bob Dobbs wrote: dave wrote: Try Davis RF BuryFlex. It's cheaper than LMR-400 and doesn't feed the war machine. http://www.davisrf.com/coax.php#attenuation At the time I got it I wasn't aware of any 'war machine' connection, maybe you could elaborate? I got it mostly because it fared better than Belden 9913 in specs and was available locally at an end of spool price. I only needed a 36 foot run to feed a Diamond V2000A, now replaced by their DP-GH62, and I was able to get about 80 feet at the time cheaper than RG-8. TMS has been instrumental in the development of military specifications, including MIL-C-17 for coaxial cables. Times is the leading source of MIL-C-17 qualified products, holding far more QPL's (Qualified Product Listings) than any other manufacturer in the world. Times also helped the US Navy write the MIL-T-81490 Transmission Line Specification, and is qualified to supply microwave transmission lines that meet MIL-T-81490 and MIL-C-87104 (US Air Force) requirements. These are the specifications that define harsh military airborne environments that Electronic Warfare transmission lines must perform in, year after year. http://www.timesmicrowave.com/about/ Another POV might be that TMS had taken advantage of the harsh environment of wartime scenarios to strive for an engineering answer. I doubt the war mongers are going to be more belligerent because of advanced technical characteristics of transmission lines. "Hey we got good coax, now lets go kick some ass" Well, maybe that could be a component of Bush-think but TMS has been affiliated with high demand environment challenges before his cabal of chicken hawks came into power. In any case their commercial product is among the best and Davis-Orion Wiregroup has most likely benefitted from some of the same research. FWIW: I don't represent TMS nor have any vested interest in the promotion of their product line, but I do enjoy good discussion. War is bad, Mmm-Kay? War is a good thing as long as you are on the winning side. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 2, 12:46*pm, dave wrote:
wrote: I've been testing out my antenna using HFDL, which gives you position data on the transmitting source. http://www.lazygranch.com/temp/pchfd...07012009_1.jpg http://www.lazygranch.com/temp/pchfd...07012009_2.jpg This is 7000 statute miles of data reception, a tougher criteria than CW or voice. The noise rejection of the Wellbrook design helps under these conditions. I've done side by side comparisons with the KIWA loop. The KIWA isn't as good as my ALA100 setup IF (big if) you use a good radio. The KIWA is filtered, so it often covers up for the lack of filtering in your receiver. 7,000 miles digital on 50 Watts? http://psk.gladstonefamily.net/pskmap.html Generally what you get with HFDL is a series of routes that make sense. For instance, you monitor Alaska, and you get routes to Alaska. But there is often an odd route or two that shows up. Using internet tracking, you can see if the flight makes sense. But these flights that are at a long distance need two things in common. One, they need to be squittering on a frequency that really doesn't make sense for the area. Two, it probably needs a sweet spot. Are there some instructions regarding your psk map? |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 2, 7:59*pm, "metoo" wrote:
- Allah me, why not take Allah me. - Allah want for Christmas is my two front teeth. - Allah board! aLLAH aLLAH oXEN fREAK ! |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , dave wrote: Bob Dobbs wrote: John Plimmer wrote: RFI and noise suppression. I didn't notice that the ALA was quieter noisewise than my DX1, nor does it suppress the harsh RFI I have here. I read your installation comments on the DX-1 where you indicated the use of RG-213 and was wondering if LMR-400 with its superior shielding would be worth a try in your admittedly noisy environment. I used Belden RG-213 for quite awhile due to its renowned UV resistance but just under a decade ago switched to the Times Microwave LMR-400 for its similar size and better specs. I haven't been disappointed. Note - the installation of standard PL-259 connectors is a little more involved but well worth the extra time to do it right. Try Davis RF BuryFlex. It's cheaper than LMR-400 and doesn't feed the war machine. http://www.davisrf.com/coax.php#attenuation What? You don't want me to eat? I grew up in a Motorala GED (now General Dynamics-Scottsdale) household. The Military Industrial Complex created me. The commercial and military electronics industry didn't create me but has been the majority of my employment. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 3, 6:48*am, dave wrote:
Telamon wrote: In article , *dave wrote: Bob Dobbs wrote: John Plimmer wrote: RFI and noise suppression. I didn't notice that the ALA was quieter noisewise than my DX1, nor does it suppress the harsh RFI I have here. I read your installation comments on the DX-1 where you indicated the use of RG-213 and was wondering if LMR-400 with its superior shielding would be worth a try in your admittedly noisy environment. I used Belden RG-213 for quite awhile due to its renowned UV resistance but just under a decade ago switched to the Times Microwave LMR-400 for its similar size and better specs. I haven't been disappointed. Note - the installation of standard PL-259 connectors is a little more involved but well worth the extra time to do it right. Try Davis RF BuryFlex. *It's cheaper than LMR-400 and doesn't feed the war machine. http://www.davisrf.com/coax.php#attenuation What? You don't want me to eat? - I grew up in a Motorala GED (now General - Dynamics-Scottsdale) household. - The Military Industrial Complex created me. Dave oh you little 'MIC' Monster you ! -ps- Dave clearly you suffer from some 'complex' just not sure that the "Military Industrial" Complex is the right one. ;;-} ~ RHF |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dwight David Eisenhower did warn us about the Military Industrial
Complex. I remember hearing his farewell address wayyyyyyyy back when. www.devilfinder.com Dwight David Eisenhower's warning about the Military Industrial Complex cuhulin |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
~ RHF wrote:
On Jul 3, 6:48 am, dave wrote: Telamon wrote: What? You don't want me to eat? - I grew up in a Motorala GED (now General - Dynamics-Scottsdale) household. - The Military Industrial Complex created me. Dave oh you little 'MIC' Monster you ! -ps- Dave clearly you suffer from some 'complex' just not sure that the "Military Industrial" Complex is the right one. ;;-} ~ RHF . "...A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be might, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction. . . . American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. . . . This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. . . .Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. . . . In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist..." -President Dwight D. Eisenhower |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I forgot to post the Ondura website.
www.ondura.com Because when I was at the Lowe's store yesterday and flirtin with that real purty nurse lady, I got three free different pamplets about Ondura roofin. I wants the green Ondura roofin, because I will paint the plywood sidin (I still needs to buy some plywood) white, after I get it installed on to my old trailer. cuhulin |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Plimmer wrote:
The ALA1530 active antenna arrived on loan on the 30th June The ALA is mounted on the same pole as the RF Systems DX1 Pro, but about 1 m down, so it is about 10m off the deck and is orientated N/S. I have checked the continuity and the ALA1530 is working fine with full power at the head. On LF the DX1 Pro hears things that are unheard on the ALA e.g. 515 CW, MAJ Majuba is quite clear on the DX1 but not heard on the ALA1530, and the same with various others. 252 LW Germany faint on the DX1 but unheard on the ALA 361 CW ASN Ascension clear on the DX1 but barely audible on the ALA More or less the same on MW band - DX1 is much clearer and stronger 1050 MW Brazil quite clear on DX1 but unreadable on ALA Then I worked the HF bands from 3 mhz up to 18 mhz Here the DX1 remains the strongest and clearest, but the ALA also puts in a good performance. RFI and noise suppression. I didn't notice that the ALA was quieter noisewise than my DX1, nor does it suppress the harsh RFI I have here. I did spend a half hour with the help of Willie and Dawn rotating it in various directions, but it could not suppress the RFI noise. I have always had the opinion that the DX1 Pro is a superior performer as I have had some outstanding catches over the years. _________________________________ John Plimmer, Montagu, Western Cape Province, South Africa South 33 d 47 m 32 s, East 20 d 07 m 32 s Icom IC-7700, Icom IC-756 PRO III with MW mods ERGO software Drake SW8. Sangean 803A Sony 7600D, GE SRIII, Redsun RP2100 Antenna's RF Systems DX 1 Pro Mk II, Datong AD-270 Kiwa MW Loop. http://www.dxing.info/about/dxers/plimmer.dx Darn it, John, now I have to consider getting a DX 1 Pro Mk II. I've read up on the DX 1 and grounding seems to be a critical issue with getting your $$$ from the unit. If I may ask, what sort of ground system are you using with it and was it a big deal to get a good ground. Thank you! John Barnard |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 6, 10:59*pm, John Barnard wrote:
Darn it, John, now I have to consider getting a DX 1 Pro Mk II. I've read up on the DX 1 and grounding seems to be a critical issue with getting your $$$ from the unit. If I may ask, what sort of ground system * are you using with it and was it a big deal to get a good ground. Thank you! John Barnard- Hi JB - the grounding is necessary to help suppress local RFI and ensure a good radio ground for top performance. Mine is just a copper strap about 8 ft long buried under nine inches of soil = nothing elaborate. Considering my poor QTH the DX1 has been a top performer over the years. JP |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
-FYI- There is a Wellbrook ALA1530 Active Magnetic Loop Antenna currently on eBay | Shortwave | |||
ALA1530 and DA100E pic | Shortwave | |||
FA:/ Wellbrook Communications ALA1530+ | Shortwave | |||
Wellbrook ALA1530+ Vs. ALA100? | Shortwave | |||
WELLBROOKE ALA1530 | Shortwave |