New Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski
could have used a few more dollops of genuine humility in his Monday
speech advocating enforceable “network neutrality” rules for the
Internet. Despite declaring “we cannot know what tomorrow holds on the
Internet,” he showed he intends to lead the FCC as if it were all-
knowing. That will only end up choking the greatest engine of
innovation in modern times.

Genachowski laid out his plans in a highly anticipated speech at the
Brookings Institution in Washington, DC. The mostly voluntary concept
of net neutrality — which encourages the free flow of content across
the Internet — would be transformed into formal rules Internet service
providers (ISPs) would violate at their peril.

Instead of managing traffic in response to market forces, ISPs would
be forced to cede such decisions to the FCC, which would decide which
practices are “fair” and “reasonable” on a “case-by-case basis.” But
it would be foolish to replace the swift judgment of millions of
consumers with the dictates of a handful of slow-footed, uninformed,
unaccountable bureaucrats.
[...]
http://sroblog.com/2009/09/29/new-fc...rican-thinker/

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...ets_inter.html

On Sep 30, 5:36Â*pm, N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote:
New Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski
could have used a few more dollops of genuine humility in his Monday
speech advocating enforceable “network neutrality� rules for the
Internet. Despite declaring “we cannot know what tomorrow holds on the
Internet,� he showed he intends to lead the FCC as if it were all-
knowing. That will only end up choking the greatest engine of
innovation in modern times.

Genachowski laid out his plans in a highly anticipated speech at the
Brookings Institution in Washington, DC. The mostly voluntary concept
of net neutrality — which encourages the free flow of content across
the Internet — would be transformed into formal rules Internet service
providers (ISPs) would violate at their peril.

Instead of managing traffic in response to market forces, ISPs would
be forced to cede such decisions to the FCC, which would decide which
practices are “fair� and “reasonable� on a “case-by-case basis.� But
it would be foolish to replace the swift judgment of millions of
consumers with the dictates of a handful of slow-footed, uninformed,
unaccountable bureaucrats.
[...]http://sroblog.com/2009/09/29/new-fcc-chairman-targets-internet-ameri...

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/..._targets_inter...

I found "Air America" t be quite boring with their logic and facts, so
I stopped listening to them well before bthey went under..
Yes, we need more like Beck, Savage and Rush.
Bring back the days of "Laugh-In"

"SeaWoe" wrote in message
...

I found "Air America" t be quite boring with their logic and facts, so
I stopped listening to them well before bthey went under..
Yes, we need more like Beck, Savage and Rush.
Bring back the days of "Laugh-In"


Better watch out or that rapier tongue will poke a hole through the cheek
it's placed so firmly against.

Laugh-In, yes.. but what this world really needs are the Smothers Brothers
and Pat Paulsen "If nominated I will not run. If elected I will not serve."
I know someone else said it before him, but Pat had a way about him.

On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:36:42 -0700, N∅ ∅baMa∅ wrote:

New Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski could
have used a few more dollops of genuine humility in his Monday speech

I see nothing wrong with prohibiting common carriers from censoring your
internet. They took a big bite out-a usenet already

The GOP Hypocritical do-nothing party of NO!
They want to give all our constitutional rights to large trillion dollar
corporations in the name of "not socialist"

These people can't think past their large beacon beer belly but find it
easy to cut-n-paste content from the republiCAN'T propaganda machine.

Sorry bunch of folks. No brains to think for themselves.

On Sep 30, 8:36Â*pm, N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote:
New Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski
could have used a few more dollops of genuine humility in his Monday
speech advocating enforceable “network neutrality� rules for the
Internet. Despite declaring “we cannot know what tomorrow holds on the
Internet,� he showed he intends to lead the FCC as if it were all-
knowing. That will only end up choking the greatest engine of
innovation in modern times.

Genachowski laid out his plans in a highly anticipated speech at the
Brookings Institution in Washington, DC. The mostly voluntary concept
of net neutrality — which encourages the free flow of content across
the Internet — would be transformed into formal rules Internet service
providers (ISPs) would violate at their peril.

Instead of managing traffic in response to market forces, ISPs would
be forced to cede such decisions to the FCC, which would decide which
practices are “fair� and “reasonable� on a “case-by-case basis.� But
it would be foolish to replace the swift judgment of millions of
consumers with the dictates of a handful of slow-footed, uninformed,
unaccountable bureaucrats.
[...]http://sroblog.com/2009/09/29/new-fcc-chairman-targets-internet-ameri...

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/..._targets_inter...

sounds like the HD Radio debacle.

"Ima" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:36:42 -0700, N? ?baMa? wrote:

New Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski could
have used a few more dollops of genuine humility in his Monday speech

I see nothing wrong with prohibiting common carriers from censoring your
internet. They took a big bite out-a usenet already


For real. It's bad enough that they decide they're going to sell you 15Mb/s
internet access, then throttle you back to 3 or 4 Mb, and sometimes even a
few hundred Kb. Hopefully, that will now end.

N? ?baMa? wrote:
New Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski
could have used a few more dollops of genuine humility in his Monday
speech advocating enforceable “network neutrality” rules for the
Internet. Despite declaring “we cannot know what tomorrow holds on the
Internet,” he showed he intends to lead the FCC as if it were all-
knowing. That will only end up choking the greatest engine of
innovation in modern times.

Genachowski laid out his plans in a highly anticipated speech at the
Brookings Institution in Washington, DC. The mostly voluntary concept
of net neutrality — which encourages the free flow of content across
the Internet — would be transformed into formal rules Internet service
providers (ISPs) would violate at their peril.

Instead of managing traffic in response to market forces, ISPs would
be forced to cede such decisions to the FCC, which would decide which
practices are “fair” and “reasonable” on a “case-by-case basis.” But
it would be foolish to replace the swift judgment of millions of
consumers with the dictates of a handful of slow-footed, uninformed,
unaccountable bureaucrats.
[...]

You really are nothing but a shill for entrenched big business. Network
Neutrality threatens no one but Time Warner.

SeaWoe wrote:


I found "Air America" t be quite boring with their logic and facts, so
I stopped listening to them well before bthey went under..
Yes, we need more like Beck, Savage and Rush.
Bring back the days of "Laugh-In"

Air America is still alive. I suggest Thom Hartmann if you like facts
and logic.

On 10/1/09 24:50 , Brenda Ann wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:36:42 -0700, N? ?baMa? wrote:

New Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski could
have used a few more dollops of genuine humility in his Monday speech

I see nothing wrong with prohibiting common carriers from censoring your
internet. They took a big bite out-a usenet already


For real. It's bad enough that they decide they're going to sell you 15Mb/s
internet access, then throttle you back to 3 or 4 Mb, and sometimes even a
few hundred Kb. Hopefully, that will now end.


That would be nice.

But I wouldn't count on it. There are always exploitable
loopholes, and lawsuits to delay, or deflect implementation.

On Sep 30, 6:36Â*pm, N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote:
New Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski
could have used a few more dollops of genuine humility in his Monday
speech advocating enforceable “network neutrality� rules for the
Internet. Despite declaring “we cannot know what tomorrow holds on the
Internet,� he showed he intends to lead the FCC as if it were all-
knowing. That will only end up choking the greatest engine of
innovation in modern times.

Genachowski laid out his plans in a highly anticipated speech at the
Brookings Institution in Washington, DC. The mostly voluntary concept
of net neutrality — which encourages the free flow of content across
the Internet — would be transformed into formal rules Internet service
providers (ISPs) would violate at their peril.

Instead of managing traffic in response to market forces, ISPs would
be forced to cede such decisions to the FCC, which would decide which
practices are “fair� and “reasonable� on a “case-by-case basis.� But
it would be foolish to replace the swift judgment of millions of
consumers with the dictates of a handful of slow-footed, uninformed,
unaccountable bureaucrats.
[...]http://sroblog.com/2009/09/29/new-fcc-chairman-targets-internet-ameri...

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/..._targets_inter...

Thank god. The future of the internet was looking pretty grim for a
while there.

Ooooooooohhh, regulation! Poor consumers, not gonna get to shape the
future of the.....wait, wait, I is a consumer! Did I SHAPE through the
natural genius of the MARKET and my thus endowed POWER my relationship
with Google (track me track me)? With my mortgage company (now that's
cheating, pick on the poor mortgage companies when they're down, poor
angels)? With Microsoft (I'm gonna get me a better word processor
spreadsheet powerpoint an' ever otha kindo softwares raht now dang
it !!!! )? With my gentle, loving bank, caring for my best interest,
Wells Fargo? With my beloved airlines (it's ok, just go to the
bathroom in the seat, we gotta get off this tarmack sometime this
week, otherwise it'll cause a GLITCH in the profits!! And you can rest
assuuuuured, young lady, that your government ain't gonna touch a hair
on the precious head of our free airline market
forcesssssssszzzzz!!!! )

Gee, I guess I musta! An I DIDN"T FEEL A THING! Free markets
haleluuuuuuuah *&*)$&*^& shoot them commies raht now sir *()&^%$ !!!

And who am I ??????? The voice of REASON !!!! TRUTH incarnate and no
less!! Listen, heathens!! Repent, protectors of the ole joke about
the bartender, the lobbyist, the congressman, and the CEO !!!!

Yessuh....yessuh.....