From:

http://www.radiotalkingpoints.com/ar...abridg e.html

Freedom of Speech?

Draft, Oct 21, 2009

To abridge? By definition, to reduce in scope, deprive, shorten in
duration, shorten in extent.

To distract? To turn aside, to draw or direct one's attention.

Neutrality? Refusal to take part in a war between other powers.

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution: Congress shall
make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting
the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of
the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The subject today is the freedom of speech, and the rumors of
administrators within the United States Government to control the
networks of communication. By interfering with the content of free
speech, by requiring the inclusion of other ideas, I argue that you
are distracting, and shortening the scope and duration of the
conversation at hand regarding whatever speech is subjected to
modification, control, or limiting scope of the Government.

For unlike the internet, which has the capacity to hold endless
volumes of materials and ideas, the human mind is limited to the
capacity of short term memory, which can be overwhelmed easily, not by
the content, but simply by the volume of material. Hence, the
requirement of the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution,
that the Government not interfere with the speech of either
individuals or the press. I argue that the requirement that publishers
or speakers include alternative viewpoints amounts to the reduction in
scope, and duration, of the speech affected.

Indeed this concept is proven by the lengthy time involved with the
transfer of information between the teacher and student(s) in schools,
which can take several years in a highly controlled setting, let alone
the spur of the moment situations that may lend themselves to the
spontaneous inspiration of ideas. While this straight forward
observation is obvious that the inclusion of alternative viewpoints in
a conversation, whatever they may be, are obvious abridgment(s) of
speech, there is also the final test, petition of the Government for a
redress of grievances.

Petition of the redress of grievances does not always occur within a
finite moment of time, but may be developed through several minds over
the exchange of correspondence or speech that may indeed span several
days, and even months. As such ideas are developed, or such opinions
formed, it is of at least equal and even more abridgment that the
required insertion of alternative viewpoints may distract, shorten, or
deprive focus of, or about the concentration of subjects of interests,
grievances, and even solutions to problems.

With this talk of Internet neutrality, I find it odd that the word
that defines the absence in participation of a war, or a conflict of
competing interests, is to be used therefore as an actual tool to
abridge the free speech of which they claim it is to defend? Pray
tell, you will not win that argument in my presence.

Since President Obama braggs about the challenge of debate, when will
he challenge the black youth of the United States to listen to the
Rush Limbaugh show for six weeks? Will Rush put one hour a day, on the
free side of his web site if they agree to this? Do you want a
challenge, do you want a virtual steel cage match where you must
battle each other with no way out unless one side can declare victory?
Or are you just firing up the banana peels as usual?

Resistance if futile, you must comply.......with the truth!

Can you smell el el el el el el el el el .........what the Rock of
Truth, who has the smartest eyebrow in the Universe, and the whitest
teeth known to man, is ............................cooking?

Being that this is the most exciting, most entertaining, fact finding,
brain busting, fun loving, liberal egg shell mind crunching,
invincible smacketh downeth erectus amongus, you can't see the truth
coming, but you know it is anyway, sonic boom of Conservatism, and,
most powerful keyboard in the world,

Do you feel lucky?

Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct
10th, 2009

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of the internet communications system, including
all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the
nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and
physical control, unless those communications represent violations of
the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to
pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possesion of the original author.

d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) may be licensed by www.google.com, for
bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or
incorporation of web master tools in the future.

g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related links,
that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown
purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the
purpose of giving copy right credit referal information under the
terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use"
regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law.

h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which has free consumer information.

i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the
author that blogging is another definition for a potentially infinite
number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will
retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of previous
communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order
to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an
enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue
getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama
has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm,
mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic
emphasis)).

j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken
Chaser!