On Nov 1, 8:56*pm, dave wrote:
MagneticEnergy wrote:
It was Bush Cheney that took a budget surplus and gave it to the
wealthy elite in the form of massive tax breaks.

* *(A budget surplus would indicate that people are being over taxed)

There is no such thing as a surplus if you are $10,000,000,000,000.00 in
debt.

Do you have a job? Is your savings account larger than it was 12
months ago?


Trick question: Do you have a house with a mortgage?

Trick question #2: Why are reichtards so arrogantly stupid?

liberal wrote:

On Nov 1, 8:56 pm, dave wrote:
MagneticEnergy wrote:
It was Bush Cheney that took a budget surplus and gave it to the
wealthy elite in the form of massive tax breaks.

(A budget surplus would indicate that people are being over taxed)

There is no such thing as a surplus if you are $10,000,000,000,000.00 in
debt.

Do you have a job?

No.

Is your savings account larger than it was 12
months ago?

Yes.

Trick question: Do you have a house with a mortgage?

Yes.

Trick question #2: Why are reichtards so arrogantly stupid?

Not as stupid as you dumbass Liberals!

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:29:51 -0800 (PST), liberal
puked:

There is no such thing as a surplus if you are $10,000,000,000,000.00 in
debt.

Do you have a job? Is your savings account larger than it was 12
months ago?

Mine's double. Just sayin'...
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:01:30 -0800, "Lamont Cranston"
puked:

On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:29:51 -0800 (PST), liberal
puked:

There is no such thing as a surplus if you are
$10,000,000,000,000.00 in debt.

Do you have a job? Is your savings account larger than it
was 12
months ago?

Mine's double. Just sayin'...

It's now $10?

No, it's a little more than that, but I stopped the lavish vacations
and ****ing money away. I cut WAY back on my charitable
contributions, all of our cars are paid off since then, just hunkering
down waiting for Obama to attack...
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

On Nov 2, 3:48*pm, dxAce wrote:
liberal wrote:
On Nov 1, 8:56 pm, dave wrote:
MagneticEnergy wrote:
It was Bush Cheney that took a budget surplus and gave it to the
wealthy elite in the form of massive tax breaks.

* *(A budget surplus would indicate that people are being over taxed)

There is no such thing as a surplus if you are $10,000,000,000,000.00 in
debt.

Do you have a job?

No.

Is your savings account larger than it was 12
months ago?

Yes.

Trick question: Do you have a house with a mortgage?

Yes.

Trick question #2: Why are reichtards so arrogantly stupid?

Not as stupid as you dumbass Liberals!

Ahhhh, you inherited your money. So you have no idea what working for
a living means.

Otoh, we liberals could be stupider than you reichtards, but at least
we're not arrogantly stupid. Oh wait, being arrogantly stupid
logically implies ya gotta be the stupider of the two of us. No doubt
that conclusion is beyond your limited capacity for thought.

liberal wrote:

On Nov 2, 3:48 pm, dxAce wrote:
liberal wrote:
On Nov 1, 8:56 pm, dave wrote:
MagneticEnergy wrote:
It was Bush Cheney that took a budget surplus and gave it to the
wealthy elite in the form of massive tax breaks.

(A budget surplus would indicate that people are being over taxed)

There is no such thing as a surplus if you are $10,000,000,000,000.00 in
debt.

Do you have a job?

No.

Is your savings account larger than it was 12
months ago?

Yes.

Trick question: Do you have a house with a mortgage?

Yes.

Trick question #2: Why are reichtards so arrogantly stupid?

Not as stupid as you dumbass Liberals!

Ahhhh, you inherited your money.

Wrongo, dumbass!

So you have no idea what working for
a living means.

Wrongo, dumbass!

Otoh, we liberals could be stupider than you reichtards, but at least
we're not arrogantly stupid. Oh wait, being arrogantly stupid
logically implies ya gotta be the stupider of the two of us. No doubt
that conclusion is beyond your limited capacity for thought.

Obviously your limited capacity is that of saving money.

On Nov 3, 2:12*pm, dxAce wrote:
liberal wrote:
On Nov 2, 3:48 pm, dxAce wrote:
liberal wrote:
On Nov 1, 8:56 pm, dave wrote:
MagneticEnergy wrote:
It was Bush Cheney that took a budget surplus and gave it to the
wealthy elite in the form of massive tax breaks.

* *(A budget surplus would indicate that people are being over taxed)

There is no such thing as a surplus if you are $10,000,000,000,000.00 in
debt.

Do you have a job?

No.

Is your savings account larger than it was 12
months ago?

Yes.

Trick question: Do you have a house with a mortgage?

Yes.

Trick question #2: Why are reichtards so arrogantly stupid?

Not as stupid as you dumbass Liberals!

Ahhhh, you inherited your money.

Wrongo, dumbass!

So you have no idea what working for
a living means.

Wrongo, dumbass!

Otoh, we liberals could be stupider than you reichtards, but at least
we're not arrogantly stupid. Oh wait, being arrogantly stupid
logically implies ya gotta be the stupider of the two of us. No doubt
that conclusion is beyond your limited capacity for thought.

Obviously your limited capacity is that of saving money.

Golly, what a elightened dissection of my post....you gotta be a
reichtard. I base my conclusion on the quality of your counterpoint.

On Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:29:51 -0800, liberal wrote:

On Nov 1, 8:56Â*pm, dave wrote:
MagneticEnergy wrote:
It was Bush Cheney that took a budget surplus and gave it to the
wealthy elite in the form of massive tax breaks.

Â* Â*(A budget surplus would indicate that people are being over
Â* Â*taxed)

There is no such thing as a surplus if you are $10,000,000,000,000.00
in debt.

Do you have a job? Is your savings account larger than it was 12 months
ago?


Trick question: Do you have a house with a mortgage?

Trick question #2: Why are reichtards so arrogantly stupid?

Just wait till he gets cancer or heart problems. His job and insurance
will be gone in weeks. Then his savings will be gone in a year.

Stupid people are soon separated from their money- when they have it.

On 11/3/09 13:12 , dxAce wrote:


liberal wrote:

So you have no idea what working for
a living means.




My uncle was a CPO in the Navy. Lifer.

When he retired, he said that there are few in the world who work as
hard as those who work below decks.


My grandfather was an officer. And one of the things he said
consistently was that an officer may make the decision to point the
ship, but it's the men who work for a living that make it go.


You don't need to agree with Steve. But he, better than most of
us, knows what it's like to work for a living.

He's earned his retirement.