Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 20, 1:36*am, Bob Dobbs wrote:
How about a general outline of your procedure, like do you start with the ferrite only then add an external loop after you hear something, and a second after the first is optimized, going back and forth massaging the controls as needed? That's sorta how I used to do it with the SW-77. That is weird you ask that because a while back I was going to start a thread on that subject but I didn't think anyone would bother to engage so I didn't bother. First and foremost, you really need to have either a lazy susan or make something that spins 360. If you're using a radio that has a speaker that fires just from the front without any venting on the back of the radio to allow you to hear something clearly.... IMO you may want to rig up an extension speaker or you'll find yourself having to move around as your table turns and it really takes the fun out of it or makes it impossible IMO. Luckily for me the P780 has the venting on the back so I can hear a signal if it's faint without having to add on a speaker or getting up. When I'm doing a session I will use just the radio barefoot on the table because if you have the loop ( IMO) sitting next to it - you aren't getting a true "hearing" so too speak.....unless you would happen to have your loop tuned 'exactly' to the spot you're on - and that just doesn't happen IMO. You wouldn't get anything accomplished that way. I'll tune to either a faint spot or a spot that sounds like crap - with two or three stations jumbled together. Then I'll rotate the table to see where I stand signal wise. For about the last year or two (not last night) I just go to an empty spot where there's nothing, that's what is so cool - when you go to what seems is a empty spot and find something there by rotating your radio and then breaking out a loop to enhance it. But when I see where I stand - then I'll break out Dave's loop and if between using the loop and the table - - and I still don't get what I want - - then I'll sit the Radio Shack loop right next to the radio. But sometimes that will make it worse, like you said, then you start massaging them. I've found that more often than not - - the second loop has to be pulled somewhat away from the radio itself and tuned off freq. I'm sure you know what I mean. It just a matter of, like Dave said, having patience and remembering basically where you were before you tried to get the signal better and screwed it up...lol. The real kicker is when you use THREE LOOPS and in that case there is no way I can use the 36X39 and Dave's loop and the rat shack....either Dave's has got to go or the bigger one....it's simply impossible. But I can use the two from rat shacks along with the five sided loop and make it work. Very rarely do I use three, but I will do it if I don't get the desired result from the two. I wish others would pipe in so I could maybe pickup a different technique. With the E1 there isn't much directionality to speak of with the whip, so the loop is generally connected before I even start looking Just curious Bob, why did you get a receiver that doesn't have a internal stick? Do you DX the BCB with something else or is that problem solved satisfactorally for you the way it is now. with its tuning all the way at one end or the other, then when something interesting shows up, I tune 'for' it and rotate the loop to maximize, and only if there's something strong that's interfering do I try to do a null. Occasionally if there's a strong local I will tune to it to increase the null potential rather than reinforce the target, but that's only rarely an issue. Exactly. :-) All that's when I take the portable out to the park or somewhere away from the house, otherwise I use one of the external outdoor HAM antennas on one of those rigs since they tend to have better receivers even without synchronous detection. Oh really? That doesn't surprise me from what I have read. I have never owned a receiver that had synch. I know what it does and all ( I think) ....but how would a radio with synch be able to better what I do with my technique/equipment on the BCB? Some make it sound like if you don't have it you're screwed and the other side doesn't make that big a deal about it. What gives? |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 20, 4:51*am, Bob Dobbs wrote:
Gregg wrote: On Dec 20, 1:36*am, Bob Dobbs wrote: How about a general outline of your procedure, like do you start with the ferrite only then add an external loop after you hear something, and a second after the first is optimized, going back and forth massaging the controls as needed? That's sorta how I used to do it with the SW-77. That is weird you ask that because a while back I was going to start a thread on that subject but I didn't think anyone would bother to engage so I didn't bother. Do like Cuhu and post whatever, regardless if you think anybody gives a ****. Ha! It use to annoy me because I would be all engrossed in a thread about a antenna or radio and then read about "the wimmins across the pond." I actually enjoy it in a way now. Ha. First and foremost, you really need to have either a lazy susan or make something that spins 360. If you're using a radio that has a speaker that fires just from the front without any venting on the back of the radio to allow you to hear something clearly.... IMO you may want to rig up an extension speaker or you'll find yourself having to move around as your table turns and it really takes the fun out of it or makes it impossible IMO. Luckily for me the P780 has the venting on the back so I can hear a signal if it's faint without having to add on a speaker or getting up. Back when I had the SW-77 I had a fairly quiet listening space so speaker aiming wasn't critical, or I used the cans. Yeah, my space is quiet fortunately. Sometimes quiet just seems to not be enough - you know? When I have tried the earphones with other radios I would find my cans either getting pulled or entangled. I was thinking of mounting a rat shack external speaker to the back of my table but really it would be a waste because the GE is basically the only radio I use on the table with the loops. * When I'm doing a session I will use just the radio barefoot on the table because if you have the loop ( IMO) sitting next to it - you aren't getting a true "hearing" so too speak.....unless you would happen to have your loop tuned 'exactly' to the spot you're on - and that just doesn't happen IMO. You wouldn't get anything accomplished that way. I'll tune to either a faint spot or a spot that sounds like crap - with two or three stations jumbled together. Then I'll rotate the table to see where I stand signal wise. That was one of my earlier protocols, to find a pileup and try to separate a bigger (louder) one out of the bunch to try and catch an ID. Exactly. For about the last year or two (not last night) I just go to an empty spot where there's nothing, that's what is so cool - when you go to what seems is a empty spot and find something there by rotating your radio and then breaking out a loop to enhance it. I haven't tried to probe any holes or gaps in the spectrum because in SoCal there aren't any at night. The scope on my Pro 3 looks like a picket fence. Lucky you. I don't have a tool like that. I try to never have to remember but just watch the S-meter and reverse any action that starts to show a decrease. Unfortunately I don't have the luxury of the S-meter or I'm sure I'd more than likely do it that way also. The real kicker is when you use THREE LOOPS and in that case there is no way I can use the 36X39 and Dave's loop and the rat shack....either Dave's has got to go or the bigger one....it's simply impossible. But I can use the two from rat shacks along with the five sided loop and make it work. Very rarely do I use three, but I will do it if I don't get the desired result from the two. curious; at what point of diminishing return do additional loops become ineffective? It just all depends, I know that isn't really giving you an answer, but you're right - - about the point of diminished returns. You can tell. Sometimes even though you have all the tools right in front of you, mother nature lets you know she's the boss and it doesn't matter what you have. ;-) I wish others would pipe in so I could maybe pickup a different technique. I imagine we pretty much have it sussed out, with the variety of techniques already discussed I agree. but you never know who'll surprise us with something novel. * I'll crap my britches and be happy about it if someone can add on to this thread about something we haven't covered or thought about. With the E1 there isn't much directionality to speak of with the whip, so the loop is generally connected before I even start looking Just curious Bob, why did you get a receiver that doesn't have a internal stick? Without rehashing the [ferrite or lack thereof in the E1] debate, I'll just say that's the way it came and the many nice features unavailable in any other portable outweighed any benefit from having a directional antenna built in, IMO. Besides I use it far more as a bedside somnific on local stations, or sometimes WWV. I understand. Makes sense. Do you DX the BCB with something else or is that problem solved satisfactorally for you the way it is now. Mostly at night (only time to AMBCB DX) I'm home indoors with easier access to HAM radios, than going out to some park with a portable, extra batteries, wire and/or loop, and headphones, not to mention all the defensive gadgets a prudent city dweller has to carry. Ha, defensive gadgets- sound like me - maybe another OT thread or over to the knife or survival group huh? Oh really? That doesn't surprise me from what I have read. I have never owned a receiver that had synch. I know what it does and all ( I think) ....but how would a radio with synch be able to better what I do with my technique/equipment on the BCB? If you're getting a whistle from some 9kc spaced station, the synch would eliminate that annoyance, plus it also tends to smooth out the QSB related distortion that inevitably seems to crop up during an awaited station ID *g OK Some make it sound like if you don't have it you're screwed and the other side doesn't make that big a deal about it. What gives? It's usenet, where you can get 3 opinions for every pair of participants. For me, after the 2010, it became a litmus for portables, even if it only gets enabled occasionally. 10-4. Little bit of snow here in Batavia. ;-P |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I own an old GE P780-E Radio.I bought it at Goodwill about twelve years
ago, it doesn't work though, or barely works, whatever. About eight or nine sumpin years ago, I saw a very good website about how to make your own loop antennas. Don't start pickin on my wimmins wayyyy over yonder across the big pond.Last night I received another email from that married Irish woman wayyyyy over yonder across the big pond in Bognor Regis,England.She said, Don't blow yourself up with those sockets. cuhulin |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gregg wrote:
On Dec 19, 6:25 am, dave wrote: From where? Graveyard channels are a very special kind of BCBDX. It takes a lot of skill and patience.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I don't know about the skill part Dave but it definitely takes patience. I would find myself at times kind of wrinkling my forehead, know what I mean? Almost like squinting but not, then catch myself and relax. I know this one guy who has the P780 and he really has his tricked out. One of the mods is he added a earphone jack to his, that would definitely be a nice add on feature to have. Why do you say it's a very special kind of DX? I know there is more hash and stations fighting to get in there if that's what you mean. I say it because there are lots of stations on those channels, and it takes skill to separate them enough to positively ID one. Anybody can hear a clear channel station. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
tonight catch 3 aug | Policy | |||
Fantastic! | Shortwave | |||
Fantastic new website!!! | Shortwave |