aracari wrote:
'William Black' wrote thus:

aracari wrote:

That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has
done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of
nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy,
ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current
global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us
through intimidation and fear.
Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things,
but never Socialist...

Why not?


Because they never ever wanted the people to have control of the means
of production, distribution and exchange.

All were in the hands of the Caliph.

Despotism and tyranny are not Socialist.

Although some Socialists are despots and run tyrannies...



--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.

On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:48:02 +0000, William Black
wrote:

aracari wrote:
'William Black' wrote thus:

aracari wrote:

That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has
done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of
nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy,
ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current
global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us
through intimidation and fear.
Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things,
but never Socialist...

Why not?


Because they never ever wanted the people to have control of the means
of production, distribution and exchange.

All were in the hands of the Caliph.

Despotism and tyranny are not Socialist.

Of course they are.
Everybody is the property of the state. That's socialism

Although some Socialists are despots and run tyrannies...

On Dec 31, 1:22*pm, dave wrote:

Ask the Dutch. *They're the ones who let the NUB* onto the plane.

*Nigerian Underwear Bomber

Under instruction from the US Feds.........

Alang wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:48:02 +0000, William Black
wrote:

aracari wrote:
'William Black' wrote thus:

aracari wrote:

That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has
done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of
nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy,
ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current
global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us
through intimidation and fear.
Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things,
but never Socialist...
Why not?

Because they never ever wanted the people to have control of the means
of production, distribution and exchange.

All were in the hands of the Caliph.

Despotism and tyranny are not Socialist.

Of course they are.
Everybody is the property of the state. That's socialism

But everyone wasn't.

The satraps were quasi independent rulers.

A society with formalised slavery isn't going to treat everyone in the
same way.

--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.

aracari wrote:
'William Black' wrote thus:

aracari wrote:
'William Black' wrote thus:

aracari wrote:

That assumes terrorists are responding to something the West has
done to them. This may be the excuse used by a tiny minority of
nutcases, but overwhelmingly the reason is hatred and jealousy,
ie they're varieties of socialists who want to destroy the current
global social order by imposing their ideology onto the rest of us
through intimidation and fear.
Well the old Islamic caliphate they wish to restore was a lot of things,
but never Socialist...

Why not?


Because they never ever wanted the people to have control of the means
of production, distribution and exchange.

Only a small number of the socialist snakeheads want this.

No

It's pretty fundamental to all Socialists, which is why we know Tony
Blair isn't one...

I describe socialism as a snake with many heads which spend their
time hissing and snapping at each other and only come together to
fight their eternal enemy: freedom and liberty.


We all already know that you define words to mean what you want them to
mean.

So did Humpty Dumpty...


--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.

"McKevvy" wrote in message
...
.. The security rep said right away
that the airports and security services need to start observing the
likely people by body language and by using common sense instead of
imposing restrictions upon everyone. Let's face it, if you had two
guys at the checkout desk - one of them is a ginger haired Scot in a
kilt and the other is a middle-eastern looking guy with shifty eyes
and a slightly nervous disposition, then which one do you think is out
to drop the plane?

It might be pointed out that in this case racial profiling based upon "a
middle eastern looking guy with shifty eyes" would not have been fruitful in
this case. What SHOULD have kept this guy off a plane was his own father
notifying authorities that he could be trouble..

Bob Dobbs wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote:
What SHOULD have kept this guy off a plane was his own father
notifying authorities that he could be trouble..

Their spam detector probably deleted the warning,
thinking it was just another Nigerian 419 message.g


Exactly. They got as far as "Nigerian banker"...

"broadssailor" wrote in message
...
On 31 Dec, 07:29, Paul Hyett wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 05:17:27, Kevin Alfred Strom
wrote in uk.politics.misc :



Far better technique than converting our societies into ever-tightening
"national security" states:

1) Stop invading and occupying other people's countries or fomenting
revolution in them, and 2) stop supporting those who do; if we did so,
90 per cent. of the hatred of the West would disappear in time. At the
same time we need to 3) take steps to prevent the invasion and
occupation of our own lands.

If they stopped carrying out terrorist attacks on the West, *we'd* stop
hassling *them*...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham

Chicken and the egg......
America has long tried to change the world into it's own vision. The
UK has been its Poodle, certainly since Thatchers time, and probably
before.The 'Special relationship' IMHO is something which exists only
in the minds of some British politicians.
I do feel however, that the time has come for 'profiling' at airport
security. The Authorities know who is a 'probable, and who certainly
isn't, based on the intelligence information which they possess - why
aren't they using it?

Don't confuse the arch "useful idiot" Paul Hyett with your inconvenient
cold, hard facts :-) It's New Years Day - show some "compassion", man !
LOL !

http://www.devilfinder.com
NASA's confirmed 2012 prediction

NASA is FULL of Sheeeeeeeeit! and I am ever so Happy to Say that
Again,,,, NASA is Full of Sheeeeeeeeeeit!

Looka here, head on over to your local libraries, look up that article
in Popular Science magazine which dates on back around eight or nine or
ten sumpin years ago.On the front cover and also in an article inside
that magazine, a former NASA employee, or retired NASA
employee/whatever, Mrs.Green said, NASA! YOU ARE BROKEN!

Yeah, go read that article in that Popular Science magazine.
cuhulin

Keystone Kops = F.umbling B.umbling I.diots.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=280445

Who do you believe our Real Enemies are?
cuhulin