Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, folks - When Drake decided to call it quits, did decent SS S-AM
die? The Eton, a few Sony radios (and maybe some future JRC NRD?) seem to be all that's left - or did I miss something? Grundig no longer seems interested (why not?) and Icom never really gave it the effort it deserved. For a fairly easy-to-implement innovation, it does not seem to show up much... Bruce Jensen |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 14, 12:20*am, bpnjensen wrote:
So, folks - When Drake decided to call it quits, did decent SS S-AM die? *The Eton, a few Sony radios (and maybe some future JRC NRD?) seem to be all that's left - or did I miss something? *Grundig no longer seems interested (why not?) and Icom never really gave it the effort it deserved. *For a fairly easy-to-implement innovation, it does not seem to show up much... Bruce Jensen From a long term observation and analysis point of view, it might seem that the days of constructing and selling traditional radio reception machinery for the purpose of pure pleasure are almost disappearing ... How sad! The last and few diehards,e.g. Eton did not bring any more S-AM into the market lately ( which is still very much alive,despite all odds! ) beside older models E1XM and G3. The once very famous and innovative (not anymore) Sony has , for some reason the tenacity to continue selling it's one and only current SW portable- 7600GR (great little sidekick); it still includes the sync detector,amazingly enough. The number 7600 must have some mysterious significance -it appears to bring good luck in Japan (at least for Sony).They have been using that model line for the last 27 years!!! Drake is not interested in HF at this time,after suddenly dropping the very decent 8-line. Both JRC and Icom have only astronomically-priced receivers for the super rich buyers,like ...emirs , kings and oligarhs. Our good old Harris RF is still here and has exceptional products (rf505,rf550 which I use occasionally) ,but the current models are either unaffordable or not available to the general public. Ten-Tec has very good RX-XXX products, somewhat more modestly priced than the three big aforementioned firms. What is Watkins - Johnson called today? DRS,I believe .They got sold several times lately. That's about it, folks. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpnjensen wrote:
So, folks - When Drake decided to call it quits, did decent SS S-AM die? The Eton, a few Sony radios (and maybe some future JRC NRD?) seem to be all that's left - or did I miss something? Grundig no longer seems interested (why not?) and Icom never really gave it the effort it deserved. For a fairly easy-to-implement innovation, it does not seem to show up much... Bruce Jensen The K3 has synchronous AM, effortlessly realized in DSP. You need a base receiver for $1,600, a wide filter for $100 and the General Coverage filter set. Run you abt $2k. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 14, 4:18*am, dave wrote:
bpnjensen wrote: So, folks - When Drake decided to call it quits, did decent SS S-AM die? *The Eton, a few Sony radios (and maybe some future JRC NRD?) seem to be all that's left - or did I miss something? *Grundig no longer seems interested (why not?) and Icom never really gave it the effort it deserved. *For a fairly easy-to-implement innovation, it does not seem to show up much... Bruce Jensen The K3 has synchronous AM, effortlessly realized in DSP. *You need a base receiver for $1,600, *a wide filter for $100 and the General Coverage filter set. *Run you abt $2k. Is it, by chance, sideband selectable? Or would it be necessary to use a passband to (more or less) achieve one side or the other? Thanks, BJ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 14, 4:18*am, dave wrote:
bpnjensen wrote: So, folks - When Drake decided to call it quits, did decent SS S-AM die? *The Eton, a few Sony radios (and maybe some future JRC NRD?) seem to be all that's left - or did I miss something? *Grundig no longer seems interested (why not?) and Icom never really gave it the effort it deserved. *For a fairly easy-to-implement innovation, it does not seem to show up much... Bruce Jensen The K3 has synchronous AM, effortlessly realized in DSP. *You need a base receiver for $1,600, *a wide filter for $100 and the General Coverage filter set. *Run you abt $2k. Just took a look-see. Mighty nice, would not need the transceiver section, but still... Still did not see how the S-AM is implemented, if at all, since it seems to not be mentioned on the page. I understand that the 6 kHz AM filter is required for AM use, and hopefully that general coverage package would include a 4 kHz. It comes with a 2.7 kHz narrow, which is about as tight as I'd care to go on AM. I also did not see a passband control on the rig, so not sure how that function would work. The reviews it gets on E-Ham are obviously glowing, so there must be something to it. Thanks! Bruce |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpnjensen wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:18 am, dave wrote: bpnjensen wrote: So, folks - When Drake decided to call it quits, did decent SS S-AM die? The Eton, a few Sony radios (and maybe some future JRC NRD?) seem to be all that's left - or did I miss something? Grundig no longer seems interested (why not?) and Icom never really gave it the effort it deserved. For a fairly easy-to-implement innovation, it does not seem to show up much... Bruce Jensen The K3 has synchronous AM, effortlessly realized in DSP. You need a base receiver for $1,600, a wide filter for $100 and the General Coverage filter set. Run you abt $2k. Is it, by chance, sideband selectable? Or would it be necessary to use a passband to (more or less) achieve one side or the other? Thanks, BJ I haven't played with it. I just have the 400 Hz 8 pole digital mode roofing filter. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpnjensen wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:18 am, dave wrote: bpnjensen wrote: So, folks - When Drake decided to call it quits, did decent SS S-AM die? The Eton, a few Sony radios (and maybe some future JRC NRD?) seem to be all that's left - or did I miss something? Grundig no longer seems interested (why not?) and Icom never really gave it the effort it deserved. For a fairly easy-to-implement innovation, it does not seem to show up much... Bruce Jensen The K3 has synchronous AM, effortlessly realized in DSP. You need a base receiver for $1,600, a wide filter for $100 and the General Coverage filter set. Run you abt $2k. Just took a look-see. Mighty nice, would not need the transceiver section, but still... Still did not see how the S-AM is implemented, if at all, since it seems to not be mentioned on the page. I understand that the 6 kHz AM filter is required for AM use, and hopefully that general coverage package would include a 4 kHz. It comes with a 2.7 kHz narrow, which is about as tight as I'd care to go on AM. I also did not see a passband control on the rig, so not sure how that function would work. The reviews it gets on E-Ham are obviously glowing, so there must be something to it. Thanks! Bruce It's a world class receiver. Nothing else comes close for the money. There are crystal filters and DSP filters. All the detection and demodulating is done with DSP. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpnjensen wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:18 am, dave wrote: [...] The K3 has synchronous AM, effortlessly realized in DSP. You need a base receiver for $1,600, a wide filter for $100 and the General Coverage filter set. Run you abt $2k. Is it, by chance, sideband selectable? Or would it be necessary to use a passband to (more or less) achieve one side or the other? Thanks, BJ I don't know if the K3 uses phasing selectable-sideband synchronous detection, or if it requires passband tuning to get a similar effect. But one should greatly prefer the phasing method, since on AM or DSB signals it gives a 6 dB advantage over using IF filters, because using the phasing method with a sync detector cancels the _interference_ in the opposite sideband, but it does _not_ cancel the opposite sideband energy of the desired signal. The reason is that the Q detector contains essentially no audio from the desired signal (the detector's locally generated carrier is locked at 90 degrees difference from the real or imputed transmitted carrier, putting the desired audio into a deep null), and therefore no cancellation of any part of the desired signal takes place. It's too bad the Eton and Sony sync detectors don't provide the option of listening only to the Q channel output. That would provide the ability to literally listen to what was underneath any DSB/AM signal. Some amateur experimenters have done this with homebrew gear, allowing operation in the close vicinity of 500-kW broadcast invaders of the 40 meter band. See the article "SSB Q-Channel Communications" for more details: http://www.antennex.com/preview/Folder01/Nov4/ssb-q.htm With all good wishes, Kevin, WB4AAIO. -- http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Two 32-bit digital signal processors provide true software-defined
features, along with expansion memory to handle future signal processing tasks and operating modes. The operator will have full control over any operating situation, with 8-band receive and transmit EQ, stereo speaker/soundcard outputs, binaural effects, and advanced noise reduction. Also included is built-in PSK31, CW, and TTY decode/encode, so the operator can enjoy the excitement of data communications with or without a computer. The rig’s rich I/O complement includes an isolated sound card interface, front/rear mic/phone jacks, dedicated serial I/O, and band data. An optional module provides transverter in/out and RX antenna in/out jacks. The latter allow the use of RX-only, in-line filters for extreme operating environments. Kevin Alfred Strom wrote: bpnjensen wrote: On Jan 14, 4:18 am, dave wrote: [...] The K3 has synchronous AM, effortlessly realized in DSP. You need a base receiver for $1,600, a wide filter for $100 and the General Coverage filter set. Run you abt $2k. Is it, by chance, sideband selectable? Or would it be necessary to use a passband to (more or less) achieve one side or the other? Thanks, BJ I don't know if the K3 uses phasing selectable-sideband synchronous detection, or if it requires passband tuning to get a similar effect. But one should greatly prefer the phasing method, since on AM or DSB signals it gives a 6 dB advantage over using IF filters, because using the phasing method with a sync detector cancels the _interference_ in the opposite sideband, but it does _not_ cancel the opposite sideband energy of the desired signal. The reason is that the Q detector contains essentially no audio from the desired signal (the detector's locally generated carrier is locked at 90 degrees difference from the real or imputed transmitted carrier, putting the desired audio into a deep null), and therefore no cancellation of any part of the desired signal takes place. It's too bad the Eton and Sony sync detectors don't provide the option of listening only to the Q channel output. That would provide the ability to literally listen to what was underneath any DSB/AM signal. Some amateur experimenters have done this with homebrew gear, allowing operation in the close vicinity of 500-kW broadcast invaders of the 40 meter band. See the article "SSB Q-Channel Communications" for more details: http://www.antennex.com/preview/Folder01/Nov4/ssb-q.htm With all good wishes, Kevin, WB4AAIO. Two 32-bit digital signal processors provide true software-defined features, along with expansion memory to handle future signal processing tasks and operating modes. The operator will have full control over any operating situation, with 8-band receive and transmit EQ, stereo speaker/soundcard outputs, binaural effects, and advanced noise reduction. Also included is built-in PSK31, CW, and TTY decode/encode, so the operator can enjoy the excitement of data communications with or without a computer. The rig’s rich I/O complement includes an isolated sound card interface, front/rear mic/phone jacks, dedicated serial I/O, and band data. An optional module provides transverter in/out and RX antenna in/out jacks. The latter allow the use of RX-only, in-line filters for extreme operating environments. -eham |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A moment of silence for the Outlaws | CB | |||
A Moment of Clarity. | Shortwave | |||
What is the best scanner at the moment? | Scanner | |||
Another classic shortwave moment | Shortwave | |||
Propagation at the moment | Shortwave |