Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 5:25*am, dave wrote:
wrote: The first ''Radios'' were Telephones.(Telephone, Telegraph, and TellaWoman) As long as there are People on Earth, and when Earthlings start setting up Housekeeping on other Planets, * (http://www.devilfinder.com Hijacking the Red Planet) *there will always be a need and also a use for Telephones and also for Shortwave Radio. http://www.krud.com ET, Phone Home! cuhulin What transpired during the dog days of summer 1859, across the 150 million-kilometer (about 93 million-mile) chasm of interplanetary space that separates the Sun and Earth, was this: on August 28, solar observers noted the development of numerous sunspots on the Sun's surface. Sunspots are localized regions of extremely intense magnetic fields. These magnetic fields intertwine, and the resulting magnetic energy can generate a sudden, violent release of energy called a solar flare. From August 28 to September 2 several solar flares were observed. Then, on September 1, the Sun released a mammoth solar flare. For almost an entire minute the amount of sunlight the Sun produced at the region of the flare actually doubled. "With the flare came this explosive release of a massive cloud of magnetically charged plasma called a coronal mass ejection," said Tsurutani. "Not all coronal mass ejections head toward Earth. Those that do usually take three to four days to get here. This one took all of 17 hours and 40 minutes," he noted. see captionNot only was this coronal mass ejection an extremely fast mover, the magnetic fields contained within it were extremely intense and in direct opposition with Earth's magnetic fields. That meant the coronal mass ejection of September 1, 1859, overwhelmed Earth's own magnetic field, allowing charged particles to penetrate into Earth's upper atmosphere. The endgame to such a stellar event is one heck of a light show and more -- including potential disruptions of electrical grids and communications systems. Back in 1859 the invention of the telegraph was only 15 years old and society's electrical framework was truly in its infancy. A 1994 solar storm caused major malfunctions to two communications satellites, disrupting newspaper, network television and nationwide radio service throughout Canada. Other storms have affected systems ranging from cell phone service and TV signals to GPS systems and electrical power grids. In March 1989, a solar storm much less intense than the perfect space storm of 1859 caused the Hydro-Quebec (Canada) power grid to go down for over nine hours, and the resulting damages and loss in revenue were estimated to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars. "The question I get asked most often is, 'Could a perfect space storm happen again, and when?'" added Tsurutani. "I tell people it could, and it could very well be even more intense than what transpired in 1859. As for when, we simply do not know," he said. http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...superstorm.htm Dave, not sure what your point is - a temporary and relatively rare disruption does not obviate an otherwise useful technology. I don't doubt his claims, and this is not a challenge, but I am curious as to how the scientist relating this tale of 19th century woe has determined the specifics so well that he can "predict" the solar mass ejection travelling through space at half the speed of light. That is crazy FAST for anything heavier than a photon. It must have been ridiculously energetic to achieve that velocity. How could we determine this 150 years after the fact, and with no reliable recording equipment at the time? Was it based purely on observations of the flare and timing of the disruption, whatever form that took? Was the telegraphy disrupted? Did keys everywhere begin to chatter chaotically? And if so, was it certain that it was the particular observed flare that resulted in the CME, or could it have been a slighlty earlier flare? Bruce Jensen |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpnjensen wrote:
Dave, not sure what your point is - a temporary and relatively rare disruption does not obviate an otherwise useful technology. I don't doubt his claims, and this is not a challenge, but I am curious as to how the scientist relating this tale of 19th century woe has determined the specifics so well that he can "predict" the solar mass ejection travelling through space at half the speed of light. That is crazy FAST for anything heavier than a photon. It must have been ridiculously energetic to achieve that velocity. How could we determine this 150 years after the fact, and with no reliable recording equipment at the time? Was it based purely on observations of the flare and timing of the disruption, whatever form that took? Was the telegraphy disrupted? Did keys everywhere begin to chatter chaotically? And if so, was it certain that it was the particular observed flare that resulted in the CME, or could it have been a slighlty earlier flare? Bruce Jensen It took down the telegraph. They saw the flare and 17 hours later the telegraph system freaked. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A BIG enough Solar Flare can/could Wipe out Bouque Piaster!
What will happen when our Sun goes belly up in about four and a half sumpin billion years from now? Assuming there are still human beings still ON Planet Earth, and also if modern technology keeps on rollin along, there will be millions of people living Under Earth/Underground. cuhulin |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 22, 11:22*am, dave wrote:
bpnjensen wrote: Dave, not sure what your point is - a temporary and relatively rare disruption does not obviate an otherwise useful technology. I don't doubt his claims, and this is not a challenge, but I am curious as to how the scientist relating this tale of 19th century woe has determined the specifics so well that he can "predict" the solar mass ejection travelling through space at half the speed of light. That is crazy FAST for anything heavier than a photon. *It must have been ridiculously energetic to achieve that velocity. *How could we determine this 150 years after the fact, and with no reliable recording equipment at the time? *Was it based purely on observations of the flare and timing of the disruption, whatever form that took? Was the telegraphy disrupted? *Did keys everywhere begin to chatter chaotically? *And if so, was it certain that it was the particular observed flare that resulted in the CME, or could it have been a slighlty earlier flare? Bruce Jensen It took down the telegraph. *They saw the flare and 17 hours later the telegraph system freaked. First off, my apology for misreading your earlier post - I thought I read 17 minutes, not hours. I need more sleep I guess. Second, my question still remains - could the event that took down the telegraph have been an earlier unobserved event, and the second *observed* flare have been aimed such that it's effect would have been smaller or unnoticed? Despite my error, 17 hours is still mighty fast for that stuff to move. This is not a big deal, I'm just wondrin, 'sall... |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bpnjensen wrote:
Second, my question still remains - could the event that took down the telegraph have been an earlier unobserved event, and the second *observed* flare have been aimed such that it's effect would have been smaller or unnoticed? Despite my error, 17 hours is still mighty fast for that stuff to move. This is not a big deal, I'm just wondrin, 'sall... Apparently we were already observing the Earth's magnetic field in 1859. Here's a timeline of the Carrington Event. http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...lar-superstorm |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
------Cinder Road------- | Shortwave | |||
Hey Road Warrior | CB | |||
Hey Road Worrier..... | CB | |||
Hey Road Worrier..... | CB | |||
Set up on Off-road rig | CB |