Are we going to elect speech writers, or CPAs, or are political speech
writers going to have to become CPA's before they write speeches? I
assume you have property taxes because you need a guaranteed income
from government services. Before you can eliminate property taxes,
don't you have to freeze them and stop the practice of property
appraisel (guessing) to make sure you don't disrupt your finances?

In order to do away with property taxes, you will cut what spending,
and raise sales taxes by how much? If you don't provide the details,
then you are guessing? If you don't have the funds in the bank for
short falls, what do you do?

When poor people run out of money, can they pay sales taxes? When you
raise sales taxes, what happens when you only have $200 in your
pocket? Raise sales taxes too much, and instead of five purchases
with $200 in your pocket, you can now only make four? What happens to
your projected revenue across the board, not just for government, but
for everyone?

Who has done this before? Who, What, When, Why, Where? Anyone can
write speeches, and we see where that is getting us? Is there really
a problem with border enforcement in Texas, or is the real problem the
safe city haven policies? Make up your mind folks, either stop
pretending you don't have open arms for immigrants, or stop blaming
them for your imaginary problems?

Lets ask the sympathy card big dog player, Mr. South Park Glenn Beck?

No sympathy cards for your best bud in the White House? Woooooof?
Woooof?

Yeah, we're just waiting for that special guest appearance or national
syndication of Herman Cain?

Who let the dogs out, woof woof wooof?

Well its no fun being a watch dog, if you can't bark, is it? What is
the most fun at being a watch dog Glenn? Having a chew toy that you
can throw up in the air occasionally? Did Master Glenn throw us a
chew toy?

Woof?

legal disclaimer:

Universal Legal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.5, dated
Nov 7th, 2009 (which supersedes all previous versions, to which this
new version applies)

The writings, views, expressions expressed by this author to include
all written and electronic forms of communication are subject to the
following disclaimer and conditions:

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived due to other
limitations incorporated into the licensed email software in use at
the time such as automated spam or virus filters. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of any type of electronic or written
communications system, including all parties, who may technically
intercept communications due to the nature of network conditions
beyond both the author's legal and physical control, unless those
communications represent violations of the law, upon which the author,
and or web site will cooperate to pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgment on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possession of the original author.

d) Any reference to copyrighted material is done in the spirit of fair
use, to illustrate the context of a discussion regarding public events
for reference purposes that adds to the conversation, for which that
discussion constitutes a new and separate piece of intellectual
property, for which the referenced copyrighted material can not convey
by itself, and that the author reserves the right to retain any
profits from the newly created intellectual property. This term also
serves to promote the referenced copyrighted material, without
necessarily endorsing the material for any particular fitness, use, or
purpose, for which the purpose of fair use referral law was created
for, through inclusion of a partial, but not whole, body of works that
the copyright fair use reference applies, for which the intent of all
terms of this disclaimer apply to that reference of a copyrighted
work.

e) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

f) The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

g) It is the opinion of the author that you respect people when you
consider their views, by reflecting their thoughts or actions against
your own, which may include use of language that conveys an emotional
depth that is to be imagined, but not enacted through use of language
that accurately, or inaccurately describes the situation,
circumstance, or idea, which does not imply that any action occur
other than the consideration of the thought, for which beyond the
author has no control, or liability for the action of the reader as
presented in all terms of this diclaimer, and may simply be the
venting of emotions with the intent of no consequence by the author to
an audience the author assumes will understand the message and intent,
and wishes to hear those views.

h) Since all intellectual property, discussions and other
communications this disclaimer applies to, either in written, or
electronic form, subscribe to the terms described in paragraph (e) and
(g) of this disclaimer, under no circumstances are any communications
meant to violate the terms of any electronic harassment laws which
include the word “harm”, for which the author understands to be
limited to the definition of physical harm (not self inflicted mental
harm) that requires immediate medical attention based solely or in
part by the communications of the author, regardless of whether the
author chooses to remain anonymous or not.

i) It is the intention and opinion of the author that History is full
of individuals that are not harmed by criticism, and in fact such
criticism can motivate and inspire them to prove their critics wrong.
Based on this historical evidence, any alleged mental harm amounts to
self inflicted injury not treatable by either medical or other
professionals (despite the fact that many people live from the profits
of lies through gradual illusion, without judicial interference), for
which the author has no control over the mental development of any
potential reader prior to the discovery or reading of the material for
which this disclaimer applies, as evident by the necessity that speech
is to be protected by law as determined by the founders of the United
States of America, who, in the opinion of the author, wrote the legal
framework, which was created by God, not slaves.

j) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) or advertisements may be licensed by
www.google.com, for bandwidth verification, or determination of
potential advertisement opportunities subject to all other terms
described in this disclaimer.

k) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are any electronic
links that may transport the reader to other web pages, sites, or
computers, and such links that may be provided for all or any of the
following known or unknown purposes, but not limited to,
informational, educational, and for the purpose of giving copy right
credit referral information under the terms outlined in the conditions
applied to the term "fair use" regarding conversations and print under
US Copy Right Law, and for which the author assumes no liability for
any particular use, fitness, or legality there of, any link, current,
past, or future, which the reader should use at their sole risk, with
no liability to the author, or any other party that may store,
transmit, or otherwise facilitate use of the material for which this
disclaimer applies.

l) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which has free consumer information which preclude the use and
need for excessive government regulation that burdens business with
obstacles it may sense that it can not overcome without inflicting
harm on the business plan or survival ability of the business to
provide advertised, goods and or services.

m) Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 or 1.4 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of
the author that “blogging” is another definition for a potentially
infinite number or forms of electronic communication, as such the
author will retroactively apply this version, 1.5 to all forms of
previous communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows,
in order to properly convey the intention of the author and to
demonstrate an enthusiasm to comply with the law.

n) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended.

o) This disclaimer is meant to establish the intent of the author who
may participate in message forums, or create other written or
electronic forms of communication to comply with current law, and may
be revoked without prior notice, due to circumstances beyond the
author's control, changes in the law, or for any of the purposes,
terms, or conditions that may be in effect or described by this
disclaimer, or to changes in this disclaimer that the author may
clarify in a revised version of this disclaimer.

p) This disclaimer is attached to this message, and retroactively
applies to all previous forms of communication by the author, and is
done so because there is no recognized central suppository of a public
disclaimer recognized by the Government of the United States to the
author, and as such, the legal imperative of the author is to apply
this disclaimer to all manner of correspondence as the author seems
fit or prudent, so that no misunderstandings occur, or to comply with
past, current or future revisions of the law, due to any of, but not
limited to, any or all of the terms, partial terms, or combination of
terms, of this disclaimer, which is derived from the freedom of
speech, for it appears to the author that the zeal of lawmakers to
take away free speech outweigh the providence of attaching this
disclaimer to all correspondence for which this applies, and any
inconvenience for which this presents, is the result of simply
complying with the law, and not to inconvenience the reader.



Use of this private web site or web page is at your own risk, for
which you agree not to sue the authors or anyone who may publish or
share this article (which must include this disclaimer) with or
without the consent of the author(s) if you do not agree, you are
violating the terms of conditions to view the content, and you may not
use or view the content for any purpose. Discussions, and or links to
media and (or) resources do not automatically indicate that either the
author, this web site, or anyone who discusses the material either
endorse the individuals or organizations referenced, either in part,
or in whole, and the author's ask the readers to make their own
conclusions.

No individual or organization, including CSPAN, Glenn Beck, Fox News,
Rush Limbaugh, endorses this web site or the use of their material on
this web site at this time, which may be either removed by request or
without notice. Use of the material is assumed appropriate for use
under the copy right act concerning fair use for discussion, to
include artistic expression to demonstrate a particular viewpoint, in
a single or group of discussions. Video or film footage may not
include the full context of the original publishing video or audio
clips, and therefore are not necessarily representative of any
referenced individual or organization

On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:59:59 -0800 (PST), Editor RadioTalkingPoints
puked:

In order to do away with property taxes, you will cut what spending,
and raise sales taxes by how much? If you don't provide the details,
then you are guessing? If you don't have the funds in the bank for
short falls, what do you do?

This is the first I've heard of this, but I would suggest that the Tea
Party agenda is also in favor of much less government, so without all
the bloat, there wouldn't be a need for all the taxes we are paying.

Do you have a link to this story?
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

lab~rat :-) wrote:


This is the first I've heard of this, but I would suggest that the Tea
Party agenda is also in favor of much less government, so without all
the bloat, there wouldn't be a need for all the taxes we are paying.


Would you support dismantling the Department of Homeland Security?

You do realize George W. Bush expanded the government more than LBJ?

http://www.devilfinder.com
Mississippi Tea Party

devilfinder.com
Mississippi Tea Parties

Devilmint,,,, Devilmint Chewmin Gummmmmm,,,,,

Heyyyyy, The Hunters movie is jisys now crankin up on teh Fox Movie
Channel.
May Britt,,, Hubba Hubba Hubba.
cuhulin

Two new RainX windshield wiper blades, O'Reilly's auto parts store on
Ellis Ave.Those blades didn't fit my van.O'Reilly's didn't have any
other blades that would fit.
I went across the street to the Advance auto parts store.Two new TRICO
blades, it says on the package, EXACT FIT, they fit like a Charm.They
were four dollars less price too.
O' O' O' O'Reilly's.
cuhulin

On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:03:52 -0800, dave puked:

lab~rat :-) wrote:


This is the first I've heard of this, but I would suggest that the Tea
Party agenda is also in favor of much less government, so without all
the bloat, there wouldn't be a need for all the taxes we are paying.


Would you support dismantling the Department of Homeland Security?

Maybe certain elements of it, yes.

You do realize George W. Bush expanded the government more than LBJ?

Do you realize that your comments change the subject to something that
has nothing to do with what we're discussing?
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Dramatic images of World Trade Center INSIDE JOB! collapse on 9/11
released for first time.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=283562

INSIDE JOB!!!
cuhulin

In article ,
says...
Dramatic images of World Trade Center INSIDE JOB! collapse on 9/11
released for first time.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=283562

INSIDE JOB!!!
cuhulin



If you really quit drinking, apparently, it was too late.

Sorry, but demolition wasn't even a possibility.

--

BDK..
Leader of the nonexistent paid shills.
Non Jew Jew Club founding member.
Former number one Kook Magnet, title passed to Iarnrod.

wrote:
Two new RainX windshield wiper blades, O'Reilly's auto parts store on
Ellis Ave.Those blades didn't fit my van.O'Reilly's didn't have any
other blades that would fit.
I went across the street to the Advance auto parts store.Two new TRICO
blades, it says on the package, EXACT FIT, they fit like a Charm.They
were four dollars less price too.
O' O' O' O'Reilly's.
cuhulin


I have to go to NAPA to get the exact match for my rear window wiper.

lab~rat :-) wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:03:52 -0800, dave puked:

lab~rat :-) wrote:

This is the first I've heard of this, but I would suggest that the Tea
Party agenda is also in favor of much less government, so without all
the bloat, there wouldn't be a need for all the taxes we are paying.

Would you support dismantling the Department of Homeland Security?

Maybe certain elements of it, yes.

You do realize George W. Bush expanded the government more than LBJ?

Do you realize that your comments change the subject to something that
has nothing to do with what we're discussing?
I don't think so. Mr. Bush created a giant new federal agency, and
expanded Medicare, and started 2 pointless wars, while cutting taxes.
He let the country go to **** and now things have to be fixed. I'm not
convinced the current bunch in DC are up to the task, but whining about
taxes is ridiculous.