If these were profitable ideas, then why are the banks not lending the
money, so that if a business fails, the people that dreamed up these
kooky ideas, loose their money in bankruptcy, instead of the tax payer
money? When a bank says no, that means even if you go into
bankruptcy, the idea is bad?

Is that being "progressive"? Your ignorant, blah, blah, blah?

How would you disguise the word "looting" if you did not want someone
to know what you really wanted to do? That's liberalism?

Hey, didn't Captain Kirk rescue a bunch of orphan kids somewhere, and
they tried to take over the ship (they had some kind of angle) and
whenever someone tried to tell them to do anything, they said "blah,
blah, blah", or something like that? And of course the adults don't
let the children run the ship, because they would probably starve to
death?


You progressives, your so new, why we've never seen these ideas
before?

Blah, Blah, Blah?






Universal Legal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.5, dated
Nov 7th, 2009 (which supersedes all previous versions, to which this
new version applies)

The writings, views, expressions expressed by this author to include
all written and electronic forms of communication are subject to the
following disclaimer and conditions:

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived due to other
limitations incorporated into the licensed email software in use at
the time such as automated spam or virus filters. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of any type of electronic or written
communications system, including all parties, who may technically
intercept communications due to the nature of network conditions
beyond both the author's legal and physical control, unless those
communications represent violations of the law, upon which the author,
and or web site will cooperate to pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgment on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possession of the original author.

"Editor RadioTalkingPoints" wrote
in message
...
If these were profitable ideas, then why are the banks not lending the
money, so that if a business fails, the people that dreamed up these
kooky ideas, loose their money in bankruptcy, instead of the tax payer
money?
Ask the repubs who blow America's money.