LONDON — The first of several British investigations into the e-mails
leaked from one of the world's leading climate research centers has
largely vindicated the scientists involved.

The House of Commons' Science and Technology Committee said Wednesday
that they'd seen no evidence to support charges that the University of
East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit or its director, Phil Jones, had
tampered with data or perverted the peer review process to exaggerate
the threat of global warming – two of the most serious criticisms levied
against the climatologist and his colleagues.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_519644.html

On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:39:21 -0800, dave wrote:

to exaggerate
the threat of global warming ¡V two of the most serious criticisms levied
against the climatologist and his colleagues.


When are they going to finally admit that at least parts of the globe are
experiencing cooling?

Why do they hold on to the warming theory when for the past 15 years we
have had irregular extreme weather patterns here in Northeast PA?

Last year was the worst, it snowed in June, and we had a brief summer until
snowing in September!

And lets not forget the resulting flooding of the Delaware River we have
had EVERY SPRING for the past 15 YEARS!!! Some of the roads here have been
closed off for almost 10 years because of this.

We used to be a popular retirement area. No more - now everyone's retiring
to the Carolinas to avoid the cold and terrible roads.

I know why - in the minds of stupid politicians it's easy to create a
linkage between pollution and holes in the ozone layer so as to create a
platform plank (and money-making scam in the private sphere) where none
should exist.

Stop lying! And if you're not, let us know when global warming is expected
up here so we can have the permanent summers we so desperately want! Or at
least a normal spring beginning in March!

--

AzzMazta's Political Institute
Verbal Diarrhea & More
Washington, DC
(www.xcopfly.com)

On Mar 31, 3:32*pm, AzzMazta wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:39:21 -0800, dave wrote:
to exaggerate
the threat of global warming V two of the most serious criticisms levied
against the climatologist and his colleagues.

When are they going to finally admit that at least parts of the globe are
experiencing cooling?

Why do they hold on to the warming theory when for the past 15 years we
have had irregular extreme weather patterns here in Northeast PA?

Last year was the worst, it snowed in June, and we had a brief summer until
snowing in September!

And lets not forget the resulting flooding of the Delaware River we have
had EVERY SPRING for the past 15 YEARS!!! Some of the roads here have been
closed off for almost 10 years because of this.

We used to be a popular retirement area. No more - now everyone's retiring
to the Carolinas to avoid the cold and terrible roads.

I know why - in the minds of stupid politicians it's easy to create a
linkage between pollution and holes in the ozone layer so as to create a
platform plank (and money-making scam in the private sphere) where none
should exist.

Stop lying! And if you're not, let us know when global warming is expected
up here so we can have the permanent summers we so desperately want! Or at
least a normal spring beginning in March!

--

AzzMazta's Political Institute
Verbal Diarrhea & More
Washington, DC
(www.xcopfly.com)

Actually, if you had been paying attention, you would know that almost
everybody already knows that some areas are cooling, warming, getting
drier, getting wetter, etc - the term is "climate change" or "climate
forcing," "global warming" is a misnomer that is perpetuated by people
for whom it pays to cause misinformation to persist.

I have no idea what the ozone hole connection is at this late date -
sounds like you just woke up from 20 years ago.

I hope you get your permanent summer - Death Valley is so delightful,
everybody should be allowed to enjoy it.

AzzMazta wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 05:39:21 -0800, dave wrote:

to exaggerate
the threat of global warming ¡V two of the most serious criticisms levied
against the climatologist and his colleagues.


When are they going to finally admit that at least parts of the globe are
experiencing cooling?

Why do they hold on to the warming theory when for the past 15 years we
have had irregular extreme weather patterns here in Northeast PA?

Last year was the worst, it snowed in June, and we had a brief summer until
snowing in September!

And lets not forget the resulting flooding of the Delaware River we have
had EVERY SPRING for the past 15 YEARS!!! Some of the roads here have been
closed off for almost 10 years because of this.

We used to be a popular retirement area. No more - now everyone's retiring
to the Carolinas to avoid the cold and terrible roads.

I know why - in the minds of stupid politicians it's easy to create a
linkage between pollution and holes in the ozone layer so as to create a
platform plank (and money-making scam in the private sphere) where none
should exist.

Stop lying! And if you're not, let us know when global warming is expected
up here so we can have the permanent summers we so desperately want! Or at
least a normal spring beginning in March!

Canada and Siberia are baking. Your little corner of the world is cooler.

Weather is not climate.

On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:38:49 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:

the term is "climate change" or "climate
forcing," "global warming" is a misnomer that is perpetuated by people
for whom it pays to cause misinformation to persist.


Total doublespeak. As evidenced by the newsgroup I CC'ed the reply to.

--

AzzMazta's Political Institute
Verbal Diarrhea & More
Washington, DC
(http://www.xcopfly.com/)

Day time temps here are in the 80s.Heap Big Spring time.
http://www.wxusa.com/wx1/Jackson-MS.htm

Won't be Heap Big much longer and the day time temps here will be in the
Heap Big 90s.Sometimes in the Heap Big 100.Heap Big Summer time.Heap Big
Hot Weather.

Currently, 62 degrees in Jackson.Currently, 71 degrees inside of my
flower box on doggy's front porch.
Heap Big,,,, Heap Big,,,, Heap Big,,,,,,,,

NO Such Thing as global warming!
cuhulin

On Apr 3, 6:31*pm, AzzMazta wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:38:49 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:
the term is "climate change" or "climate
forcing," "global warming" is a misnomer that is perpetuated by people
for whom it pays to cause misinformation to persist.

Total doublespeak. As evidenced by the newsgroup I CC'ed the reply to.

--

AzzMazta's Political Institute
Verbal Diarrhea & More
Washington, DC
(http://www.xcopfly.com/)

That's not the point, cement-head. You have no clue what you're
talking about, as proven by your totally outdated jargon that even the
knowledgeable naysayers left behind years ago.

On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:50:43 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:

On Apr 3, 6:31Â*pm, AzzMazta wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:38:49 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:
the term is "climate change" or "climate
forcing," "global warming" is a misnomer that is perpetuated by
people for whom it pays to cause misinformation to persist.


As evidenced by the newsgroup I CC'ed the reply to.


That's not the point, cement-head. You have no clue what you're talking
about, as proven by your totally outdated jargon that even the
knowledgeable naysayers left behind years ago.

So the name of the newsgroup is a dated term? From what I understand the
word "global warming" is still used by the media, even by believers. Most
people are finally admitting it's not-warming-everywhere "climate change"
now?

Also, you in the group keep referring to the effect of CFCs on the ozone
as "dated", I know they are banned now, but I was referring to how only
using the word "warm" could link the climate change issue to holes
created by greenhouse gases in the minds of non-intellectuals (such as
politicians). Thus "Global Warming" becomes a platform plank where we
need to (de)regulate business activity based on more than just short-term
health problems. "Climate Change" is harder to prove.

--

AzzMazta's Political Institute
Verbal Diarrhea & More
Washington, DC
(http://www.xcopfly.com/)

On Apr 6, 1:46*pm, AzzMazta wrote:
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:50:43 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:
On Apr 3, 6:31*pm, AzzMazta wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:38:49 -0700, bpnjensen wrote:
the term is "climate change" or "climate
forcing," "global warming" is a misnomer that is perpetuated by
people for whom it pays to cause misinformation to persist.

As evidenced by the newsgroup I CC'ed the reply to.

That's not the point, cement-head. *You have no clue what you're talking
about, as proven by your totally outdated jargon that even the
knowledgeable naysayers left behind years ago.

So the name of the newsgroup is a dated term? From what I understand the
word "global warming" is still used by the media, even by believers. Most
people are finally admitting it's not-warming-everywhere "climate change"
now?

Also, you in the group keep referring to the effect of CFCs on the ozone
as "dated", I know they are banned now, but I was referring to how only
using the word "warm" could link the climate change issue to holes
created by greenhouse gases in the minds of non-intellectuals (such as
politicians). Thus "Global Warming" becomes a platform plank where we
need to (de)regulate business activity based on more than just short-term
health problems. "Climate Change" is harder to prove.

--

AzzMazta's Political Institute
Verbal Diarrhea & More
Washington, DC
(http://www.xcopfly.com/)

Now I know why your signature has "verbal diarrhea" in it.

Prayers for the West Virginia coal Miners.
cuhulin