Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
sctvguy1 wrote:
Gregg wrote: I'm going to make a point sometime this week to see if the Ace around here has the SR and maybe pick one up. Sometimes it's hard for me to get past the way these radios are put together. I remember when I was going to pu the RS that touted that piece as a "long distance" radio. The knobs and switches were loose and there was just no heft to the piece for its size. There's no way that particular radio would have held up to all the hours I would have used it IMO. I think that they are now re-branded RCA,but still the same radio. It is still pretty solid, not a lightweight. The varactor tuning knob is very touchy however. The Select-Tenna really helps null out the noise and the interference, in addition to the ferrite rod in the radio. BTW, I picked up an old Knight Star Roamer with a wound loop in the back of the radio. With some tweaking of the controls, it is a good BCBDXer! Four tubes and a selenium resistor. It was restored by a friend of mine who specializes in old radios. I am getting overrun with old radios around here! My really great AM DXer is my Panasonic RF-2200 with the swiveling ferrite rod, can't beat that baby! Got it at Keesler AFB when I was stationed there in the '80s. Those radios are all built in Asia by Thomson Multimedia. |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Gregg wrote:
Hey Michael, I'll just add that I don't really feel the same way as you when you say "the old radios were lousy" or even your last sentence. Though no doubt, there are pluses to the digital radios - if it's really that big a deal - you can take care of that - not the presets of course but having a digital next to you if it's that big a deal to check the bands would suffice. But a lot of the old radios were lousy. Yes, if you spent a lot of money you got good radios, but a lot of people were using low end radios. When I got a Hallicrafters S-120A in the summer of 1971, I couldn't afford anything better, not only was it lousy in terms of reception (completely lacking in sensitivity, it overloaded too much, couldn't receive SSB because the BFO was too weak, horrible backlash on the tuning, and on and on), but for calibration it was like "well, the pointer [which was terribly wide anyway) is closer to the 10.5MHz mark than the 10MHz mark, and even then it might not have been on 10MHz when the pointer was on that mark. A lot of people had that level of radio, you just have to look at the pictures in the old magazines. Even when I got an SP-600 a year later, that was still fairly vague in the resolution department, though it had a good logging scale and no blacklash on the tuning so I could have built up a tuning scale built on that logging scale. Except that some analog tuning shortwave receivers are creeping in, like the S350, you can get digital tuning at all price levels. The radios behind those digital dials may still be lousy, but at least you can tune in the strong signals, just like that S-120 from almost forty years ago, but now you know what frequency you are tuned to. An important consideration is that the circuitry is now cheap, and it's easier to automatically solder in extra components than it is to calibrate a dial, especially when those analog radios would all be mildly different so all had to be adjusted to match the dial. Hand calibrating/adjustment is costly, the extra parts for digital tuning isn't. Likewise, a ceramic filter is cheap in large quantities, and does away with multiple IF transformers, and the need to align them. Sometimes complicating a design makes things easier to produce. For AM broadcast band DXing, any old table radio was a good start, they were sensitive enough. But they all had lousy dials, leaving that same issue I previously explained, not being sure where you are, having problems getting back to that previous frequency. The Delco digitally tuned car radio I use by the bed has the best FM reception I've seen (admittedly limited to what I've actually tried). Good sensitivity, good selectivity, and virtually no overload. And yes, if it hadn't been digitally tuned, I likely wouldn't have heard that Mississippi station some years back here in Montreal, because I wouldn't have automatically tried the not quite local station in the preset and found reception exceptional, so I tuned the band and found that Mississippi station and some others not so distant. And it was gone almost as soon as it began. You want digital tuning and presets under those circumstances, because you don't have the time to tune up and down the dial. Michael |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Black wrote:
But a lot of the old radios were lousy. Yes, if you spent a lot of money you got good radios, but a lot of people were using low end radios. When I got a Hallicrafters S-120A in the summer of 1971, I couldn't afford anything better, not only was it lousy in terms of reception (completely lacking in sensitivity, it overloaded too much, couldn't receive SSB because the BFO was too weak, horrible backlash on the tuning, and on and on), but for calibration it was like "well, the pointer [which was terribly wide anyway) is closer to the 10.5MHz mark than the 10MHz mark, and even then it might not have been on 10MHz when the pointer was on that mark. Hey, I had the Helen Keller Signature model version of the S120a. Other than crystal radios I built as a kid, I'm not sure I've ever had another radio with that level of performance. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gregg" wrote in message ... On Apr 25, 9:14 am, dave wrote: Gregg wrote: On Apr 24, 11:55 am, wrote: Am looking for the best choice of a portable AM radio, to be used mainly to listen to talk radio, both local and national stations. Audio sound quality and decent tuner are a must. Inclusion of a shortwave band would be nice, but not a requirement. I do want digital tuning, and station presets. Have had a CC Crane radio for five years, and getting a bit tired of it. Good sound, but quality control is awful, and digital readout is flaky. thanks !! James This should be fun to watch:-) I like radios with continuously variable tuning, or at least ones with 1 kHz or better resolution, so I can off-tune slightly for better intelligibility or interference mitigation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - IMHO - a real good radio for the BCB or listening to talk radio should be a radio that is strictly AM. I know - I know there are some extremely good receivers that have the SW and FM with the AM but in most cases there are taking 'something' away to have all three modes. The only radio I would buy that had the AM and FM for talk radio would be one of the SR or if you can find a GE P-780 on Ebay, grab it. I can't count how many hundreds of hours where I have the GE on and listening to the Reds games or talk radio, it's fabulous for that. Just my take.ducking beer bottles Talk radio and sports don't mix, they preempt talk radio with those stupid baseball games! Now I'm ducking beer bottles Yea, I have a couple of GE SRs too. Mike |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Black" wrote in message ample.net... On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Gregg wrote: On Apr 25, 8:31 am, Gregg wrote: On Apr 25, 9:14 am, dave wrote: Gregg wrote: On Apr 24, 11:55 am, wrote: Am looking for the best choice of a portable AM radio, to be used mainly to listen to talk radio, both local and national stations. Audio sound quality and decent tuner are a must. Inclusion of a shortwave band would be nice, but not a requirement. I do want digital tuning, and station presets. Have had a CC Crane radio for five years, and getting a bit tired of it. Good sound, but quality control is awful, and digital readout is flaky. thanks !! James This should be fun to watch:-) I like radios with continuously variable tuning, or at least ones with 1 kHz or better resolution, so I can off-tune slightly for better intelligibility or interference mitigation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - IMHO - a real good radio for the BCB or listening to talk radio should be a radio that is strictly AM. I know - I know there are some extremely good receivers that have the SW and FM with the AM but in most cases there are taking 'something' away to have all three modes. The only radio I would buy that had the AM and FM for talk radio would be one of the SR or if you can find a GE P-780 on Ebay, grab it. I can't count how many hundreds of hours where I have the GE on and listening to the Reds games or talk radio, it's fabulous for that. Just my take.ducking beer bottles- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oops - you say no analog and want presets, forget about my post then. Let us know what you decided but you may want to reconsider it "having to be" digital with presets, what's the big deal about turning the knob and having to have stations preset? I never understood that, especially for the BCB. But, presets are also useful for listening to distant stations. I have a Delco digitally tuned car radio as my bedside radio. Michael I have a car radio that use as my bedside radio too. I did it mostly for the presets, much easier in the middle of the night to just push a button, then to turn a knob. I use a pillow speaker and just recently I added a volume control on the pillow speaker so I don't need to roll over to adust volume. BTW, what do you use for your antenna on your car radio? I just used a regular car antenna, but would like to get a better AM antenna outdoors. This brings up several problems as the input is both AM and FM. Any idea about impedance matching for the antenna input on a car radio? Mike I still have my Icom R-71a which I'll use occasionally |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 26, 12:45*pm, "amdx" wrote:
"Gregg" wrote in message ... On Apr 25, 9:14 am, dave wrote: Gregg wrote: On Apr 24, 11:55 am, wrote: Am looking for the best choice of a portable AM radio, to be used mainly to listen to talk radio, both local and national stations. Audio sound quality and decent tuner are a must. Inclusion of a shortwave band would be nice, but not a requirement. I do want digital tuning, and station presets. Have had a CC Crane radio for five years, and getting a bit tired of it. Good sound, but quality control is awful, and digital readout is flaky. thanks !! James This should be fun to watch:-) I like radios with continuously variable tuning, or at least ones with 1 kHz or better resolution, so I can off-tune slightly for better intelligibility or interference mitigation.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - IMHO - a real good radio for the BCB or listening to talk radio should be a radio that is strictly AM. I know - I know there are some extremely good receivers that have the SW and FM with the AM but in most cases there are taking 'something' away to have all three modes. The only radio I would buy that had the AM and FM for talk radio would be one of the SR or if you can find a GE P-780 on Ebay, grab it. I can't count how many hundreds of hours where I have the GE on and listening to the Reds games or talk radio, it's fabulous for that. Just my take.ducking beer bottles * Talk radio and sports don't mix, they preempt talk radio with those stupid baseball games! * * Now I'm ducking beer bottles Yea, I have a couple of GE SRs too. * * * * * * * * * *Mike- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ha! I don't know if you really feel that way or was just trying to get a reaction. I'll play. ;-) Actually here in the Nati' - talk radio preempts baseball. I feel lucky to reside in Cincinnati for many reasons but the one I feel most gracious for and actually take for granted is the talk radio. I'm sure every city has talk radio but from the afternoon with Bill Cunningham all the way through to the midnight show with Steve Somers and The American Trucking Network - it's just real good listening and everyone is local. That's why I like to tune to other cities and listen to their homegrown talent, you learn alot about those areas by their talk radio IMO. |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Black wrote:
For AM broadcast band DXing, any old table radio was a good start, they were sensitive enough. But they all had lousy dials, leaving that same issue I previously explained, not being sure where you are, having problems getting back to that previous frequency. That's absurd. We were quite able to tune a 5 tube All-American from 540 to 1600 in the twist of the wrist. KTAR next to the first triangle, KRIZ was next to the second triangle. KUPD was in the middle. Nobody had any trouble knowing where on the dial "their" station appeared. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 27, 8:44*am, dave wrote:
Michael Black wrote: For AM broadcast band DXing, any old table radio was a good start, they were sensitive enough. But they all had lousy dials, leaving that same issue I previously explained, not being sure where you are, having problems getting back to that previous frequency. That's absurd. *We were quite able to tune a 5 tube All-American from 540 to 1600 in the twist of the wrist. *KTAR next to the first triangle, KRIZ was next to the second triangle. *KUPD was in the middle. *Nobody had any trouble knowing where on the dial "their" station appeared. I've read what Michael has said in some other posts about why he didn't like the older radios. I couldn't really put myself is his place because I only have experience in the specific Hammars I own and some of my older but newer analogs. But I didn't really understand when he said about losing your spot or however he said it. I never had a problem finding the exact same spot after I left a specific freq - only took a second or two - and now with the freq counter it's exactly the same....spot on as having a digital. I know it doesn't take long to spin my wheel and I'm there. I'm not familiar with some of the pieces he was speaking about - maybe they just flat out sucked and gave him a bad taste? |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Panasonic quality went to Crap! on a Panasonic RF-2600 AM/FM/Shortwave
radio I bought new at a Service Merchandise store.A few years after I bought that radio it got to where it won't stay on station, tune in a station and you can see the tuning knob physically move, off station.Then, it got to where it won't turn on at all unless I wedge a little bitty piece of something between the earphone jack and the plastic case. Panasonic, HUMPH! I still have that radio too, I hardly ever use it though. Panasonic, HUMPH! cuhulin |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have some old tube type car radios.Those old AM car radios from the
1950's are some of the best AM radios.Mount one inside of a metal box and use a 12 volt battery and you have a good AM radio to use in your home. cuhulin |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|