On Apr 30, 8:50*am, dave wrote:
sctvguy1 wrote:
Remember, Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini were left-wing Socialists, just put a
different spin on their particular brand.

Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin were all totalitarians.

Jesus was a socialist, Hitler was not.


Jesus was no socialist. He was apolitical and would no doubt condemn
most modern politicians regardless of party.

Liberals constantly mock Christ and Christians ad nauseam 24x7, yet
have the gall to claim Jesus as one of their own ("Jesus was a
socialist"). The hypocracy of the left is breathtaking.

On May 1, 1:29*pm, DEFCON 88 wrote:
On Apr 30, 8:50*am, dave wrote:

sctvguy1 wrote:
Remember, Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini were left-wing Socialists, just put a
different spin on their particular brand.

Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin were all totalitarians.

Jesus was a socialist, Hitler was not.

Jesus was no socialist. He was apolitical and would no doubt condemn
most modern politicians regardless of party.

Liberals constantly mock Christ and Christians ad nauseam 24x7, yet
have the gall to claim Jesus as one of their own ("Jesus was a
socialist"). The hypocracy of the left is breathtaking.

Do you experience electrical short circuits as often as philosophical
short-circuits?

In article ,
wrote:

Whistelblower: BP Risks More Massive Catastrophies In Gulf.

BOYCOTT EVERYTHING Brit!!!
cuhulin

I'll drink to that ;O)
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html

In article ,
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:

dave wrote:
sctvguy1 wrote:

Remember, Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini were left-wing Socialists, just
put a
different spin on their particular brand.

Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin were all totalitarians.

Jesus was a socialist, Hitler was not.


Actually, the "Jesus" in the Bible tales is highly unlikely ever to
have existed, but taking the stories at face value I find no
statement from him demanding that property or wealth be taken from
one group of people and forcibly given to another -- which is the
practical essence of state socialism.

He did say, "Slaves, obey your masters," though -- so perhaps I am
wrong and he was a socialist after all.


I thought it was the Republicans that were building the bridge to the
11th Century, hmmm.

What kinda radio did Jesus have? (sly attempt at a segway back to the
group;O)

With every good wish,


Kevin, WB4AIO.
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html

In article ,
"D. Peter Maus" wrote:

On 4/30/10 11:24 , bpnjensen wrote:
On Apr 30, 7:08 am, "Brenda
wrote:
"Kevin Alfred wrote in
...





dave wrote:
sctvguy1 wrote:

Remember, Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini were left-wing Socialists, just
put a
different spin on their particular brand.

Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin were all totalitarians.

Jesus was a socialist, Hitler was not.

Actually, the "Jesus" in the Bible tales is highly unlikely ever to have
existed, but taking the stories at face value I find no statement from
him
demanding that property or wealth be taken from one group of people and
forcibly given to another -- which is the practical essence of state
socialism.

He did say, "Slaves, obey your masters," though -- so perhaps I am wrong
and he was a socialist after all.

He did command His followers to "give up their worldly goods and follow
him"
(paraphrased)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

My guess is that Jesus, whatever He was according to history, was
apolitical. Render unto Caesar, and all that...God's kingdom doth not
discriminate on the basis of political affiliation, right?



And on this we can agree.

But there is that small print that says,"Again I tell you, it is easier
for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to
enter the kingdom of God."

At least I'm good on that score;O)
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html

In article ,
"D. Peter Maus" wrote:

On 4/27/10 15:03 , bpnjensen wrote:
On Apr 27, 12:44 pm, "D. Peter wrote:
On 4/27/10 14:33 , bpnjensen wrote:

On Apr 27, 12:26 pm, DEFCON wrote:
On Apr 26, 8:22 pm, ?baMa? Tse wrote:

he left-wing architects of the subprime mortgage collapse have yet to
be called to account.

They'll never be called to account while the Marxist Mafia runs the
federal govt and most of the news media.

That's right! Socialism rules! You rightwing Fascist wackos are
toast! Hahahhahahhah!

Ahem....the Chicago delegation would like to remind the Gentleman
from California that a banquet in Cicero has been planned in the
honor of the Marxist Mafia.

We'll provide the Louisville Sluggers.

You may want to bring a towel.

Why am I not surpised that violence is being theatened? ;-)

It's the Chicago way. Note that the Marxist Mafia is talking
about putting the National Guard on the streets of Chicago to handle
local crime.


And after
the Marxist Mafia was actually voted in by the people!


That must irritate Gov. Bush (only office to which he was actually
elected) after he set the precedent of sending mercenaries (ahem), I
mean "contractors" into New Orleans. (You ever notice that they don't
wear a tool belt?)
And lied to make that happen. And govern against the will of the
People.


Such
unconstitutional behavior - break out the tanks and the nukes!


Bring it.
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html

In article ,
dave wrote:

D. Peter Maus wrote:


Sorta like Bush and company lied us into two wars?


Your needle is stuck.


And inaccurate. If you include Prescott Bush, and Herbert Herbert, it's
way more than 2 undeclared wars.

An don't forget Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Sudan, East Timore,
Haiti, Cuba, Chile, Costa Rica, Iran, the Arab street in general, Congo,
black Americans, indigenous Americans, and coming soon, Venezuela.
--
- Billy
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the
merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn3lF5XSUg
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/HZinn_page.html

Chas. Chan wrote:
On Apr 30, 9:22 pm, wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:
On Apr 30, 5:50 am, wrote:
sctvguy1 wrote:
Remember, Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini were left-wing Socialists, just put a
different spin on their particular brand.

Hitler, Mussolini, and Stalin were all totalitarians.

Jesus was a socialist, Hitler was not.

I think characterizing Hitler and Mussolini as left-wing is a stretch,
to say the least.

There are two kinds of socialism; state socialism; and anarchist
socialism. I am the latter. This is a utopian position. I am also a
pragmatist.

What you are is a confused compulsive liar.

You're projecting again, Sigmund.

bpnjensen wrote:
On May 1, 6:59 am, wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:
On Apr 30, 7:22 pm, wrote:

There are two kinds of socialism; state socialism; and anarchist
socialism. I am the latter. This is a utopian position. I am also a
pragmatist.

So was Neville Chamberlain ;-)

I don't get it.

Neville Chamberlain got "peace in our time" by being pragmatic.

Chamberlain was the victim of character assassination. Churchill liked
him a lot. You should look for "the rest of the story".

On May 1, 6:56*pm, dave wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:
On May 1, 6:59 am, *wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:
On Apr 30, 7:22 pm, * *wrote:

There are two kinds of socialism; state socialism; and anarchist
socialism. *I am the latter. *This is a utopian position. *I am also a
pragmatist.

So was Neville Chamberlain ;-)

I don't get it.

Neville Chamberlain got "peace in our time" by being pragmatic.

Chamberlain was the victim of character assassination. *Churchill liked
him a lot. *You should look for "the rest of the story".

Now, now, I did not assassinate his character, I just related a
verifiable historic event. Hindsight is 20-20, and nobody picked on
him at the time for appeasement - that came later.