Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old April 28th 10, 05:25 PM posted to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.news-media,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.usa,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 24
Default Whose Country is This?

On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:48:34 -0400, "Sid9" puked:


"Cicero Venatio" wrote in message
om...
Sid9 wrote:

"Cicero Venatio" wrote in message
m...
S
.
.
I wonder who in AZ provides employment for a half million people?

Throw a few of these employers in jail and their fellow criminal
employers will fire all of the half million illegals.

-----------
not that easy. If you want a law suit filed against you for racial
discrimination by the state or the feds, or you could be sued by
Chicanos por la Causa or La Raza for being racist. Also all of these
people have documentation, it may be forged documentation, but how can
you tell. Simple solutions are for simpletons. The flaw in the e-verify
system was there was no picture of the individual in the database, but
maybe in the future they will have some sort of system where employers
can actually find out if the employee is illegal or not. When the feds
bust an employer, they actually have some pictures that go with the
social security numbers, something the employer had no access to. Sound
unfair, or course it is. BTW, do the feds have a picture of you,
"Sid9"? If not an illegal could have a forged a social security card
with "Sid9" "555-11-5555" or whatever your number is, and how would the
employer tell if it was you or someone else, unless there is a picture
to go with it?


False.

You will not be sued for complying with the law.

--------------
You've never been sued have you? If I knew your real name, where you
live, I could show you personally how easy it is to do. Then you'd be
"educated" on how the real world works.

.
.
Judges frown on frivolous lawsuits...it might be a costly endeavor.


Yet every day, courthouses across America are slap-ass loaded with
them...
--
lab~rat :-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
  #22   Report Post  
Old April 29th 10, 02:05 AM posted to alt.news-media,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.usa,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 952
Default Whose Country is This?

On 4/28/2010 7:23 AM, Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:

And the fact that many treaties were not kept redounds to our shame as a
people -- and constitutes a lesson in the corruption of the Washington
regime that all peoples should learn.


Sadly, this is nothing new.

The "Lady in Red" said she would blow the whistle on John Dillinger if
the government wouldn't deport her back to Romania.

Guess who got a free trip to Romania even though she held up her end of
the bargain.

We lied to the people we were supposed to support for the Bay of Pigs
invasion.

We screwed the Hmong for their help in the Viet Nam war.

We screwed the Kurds TWICE with broken promises.

It seems the word of the government isn't worth very much.

....and the beat goes on.
  #23   Report Post  
Old April 29th 10, 04:38 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default Whose Country is This?

Snopes Exposed.I have said before, Sometimes Snopes doesn't get it
right.

Nearly 2 Feet of Snow Falls in NY, New England.Sierra Mountains recently
got some Snow.Not too many years ago, Miami,Florida got some Snowflakes,
in April.
''global warming'/
http://www.libertypost.org
cuhulin

  #24   Report Post  
Old April 29th 10, 02:46 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default Whose Country is This?

You know I am Right.
cuhulin

  #25   Report Post  
Old April 29th 10, 02:59 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default Whose Country is This?

wrote:
UK is not a Country.
cuhulin


https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat...k/geos/uk.html


  #26   Report Post  
Old April 29th 10, 03:00 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default Whose Country is This?

wrote:
Camels used to be native in America.
So were Horses, untill they got all hunted down and eaten up and then
Horses showed up again by the Spaniards.


Wrong on two counts.
  #27   Report Post  
Old April 29th 10, 04:09 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,185
Default Whose Country is This?

wrote:
UK is not a Country.
cuhulin


https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat...k/geos/uk.html
  #28   Report Post  
Old April 29th 10, 08:39 PM posted to alt.news-media,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.usa,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 200
Default Whose Country is This?

On Apr 27, 11:46*pm, Kevin Alfred Strom kevin.st...@revilo-
oliver.com wrote:
Cicero Venatio wrote:
S
.
.
I wonder who in AZ provides employment for a half million people?


Throw a few of these employers in jail and their fellow criminal
employers will fire all of the half million illegals.


-----------
not that easy. *If you want a law suit filed against you for racial
discrimination by the state or the feds, or you could be sued by
Chicanos por la Causa or La Raza for being racist. *Also all of these
people have documentation, it may be forged documentation, but how can
you tell. *Simple solutions are for simpletons. *The flaw in the
e-verify system was there was no picture of the individual in the
database, but maybe in the future they will have some sort of system
where employers can actually find out if the employee is illegal or not..
*When the feds bust an employer, they actually have some pictures that
go with the social security numbers, something the employer had no
access to. *Sound unfair, or course it is. *BTW, do the feds have a
picture of you, "Sid9"? *If not an illegal could have a forged a social
security card with "Sid9" "555-11-5555" or whatever your number is, and
how would the employer tell if it was you or someone else, unless there
is a picture to go with it?


The answer is to go back to what America had prior to 1965: a
national origins based immigration system (wherein immigration from
any country was allowed only to the extent of that nationality's
percentage of the already existing American population), and a
race-based definition of citizenship (see the Naturalization Act of
1790, in force until the 1950s). Under such a system, no complicated
set of ID documents would be required -- just a good pair of eyes.

Of course, Central Americans of European descent would easily be
able to sneak through -- but then, they aren't the ones causing
problems, are they?

I know that the Arizona (and other) patriots who want to stop the
invasion from the south fall all over themselves denying that they
have any racial motivation. But if all they really care about is
"what's legal," they might as well quit all their fussing and go
home and watch "Dancing With the Stars."

For "what is legal" can change in a nanosecond -- the moment the
criminals in Washington declare their "amnesty," every invader will
instantaneously become "legal."

And then what will the patriots do? Become honest, and admit that
this is a biological issue, of one people displacing another people
and taking their territory and resources? I hope so. Without
honesty, no solution is possible.

With all good wishes,

Kevin Alfred Strom.
--http://kevinalfredstrom.com/- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Agreed! The non-Whites who are chimping-out over Arizona's law freely
admit that their main concern is for their RACE. The unspoken truth is
that this is a non-White vs White, as is so many other political
issues these days. Non-Whites are not afraid to stand up and organize
for their own race. Unless Whites stop being a bunch of grovelling
cowards, afraid of being called "racist" by a bunch of (essentially)
left-wing Marxist thugs, and start standing up for themselves AS A
RACE, Whites will utterly lose the country and civilization that they
founded and built, and will be hunted to extinction by the non-Whites
who are just itching to destroy the USA.
  #29   Report Post  
Old April 29th 10, 08:59 PM posted to alt.news-media,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.usa,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 200
Default Whose Country is This?

On Apr 27, 11:46*pm, Kevin Alfred Strom kevin.st...@revilo-
oliver.com wrote:
Cicero Venatio wrote:
S
.
.
I wonder who in AZ provides employment for a half million people?


Throw a few of these employers in jail and their fellow criminal
employers will fire all of the half million illegals.


-----------
not that easy. *If you want a law suit filed against you for racial
discrimination by the state or the feds, or you could be sued by
Chicanos por la Causa or La Raza for being racist. *Also all of these
people have documentation, it may be forged documentation, but how can
you tell. *Simple solutions are for simpletons. *The flaw in the
e-verify system was there was no picture of the individual in the
database, but maybe in the future they will have some sort of system
where employers can actually find out if the employee is illegal or not..
*When the feds bust an employer, they actually have some pictures that
go with the social security numbers, something the employer had no
access to. *Sound unfair, or course it is. *BTW, do the feds have a
picture of you, "Sid9"? *If not an illegal could have a forged a social
security card with "Sid9" "555-11-5555" or whatever your number is, and
how would the employer tell if it was you or someone else, unless there
is a picture to go with it?


The answer is to go back to what America had prior to 1965: a
national origins based immigration system (wherein immigration from
any country was allowed only to the extent of that nationality's
percentage of the already existing American population), and a
race-based definition of citizenship (see the Naturalization Act of
1790, in force until the 1950s). Under such a system, no complicated
set of ID documents would be required -- just a good pair of eyes.

Of course, Central Americans of European descent would easily be
able to sneak through -- but then, they aren't the ones causing
problems, are they?

I know that the Arizona (and other) patriots who want to stop the
invasion from the south fall all over themselves denying that they
have any racial motivation. But if all they really care about is
"what's legal," they might as well quit all their fussing and go
home and watch "Dancing With the Stars."

For "what is legal" can change in a nanosecond -- the moment the
criminals in Washington declare their "amnesty," every invader will
instantaneously become "legal."

And then what will the patriots do? Become honest, and admit that
this is a biological issue, of one people displacing another people
and taking their territory and resources? I hope so. Without
honesty, no solution is possible.

With all good wishes,

Kevin Alfred Strom.
--http://kevinalfredstrom.com/- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Agreed! The non-Whites who are chimping-out over Arizona's law freely
admit that their main concern is for their RACE. The unspoken truth
is
that this is a non-White vs White issue, as are so many other
political
issues these days. Non-Whites are not afraid to stand up and organize
for their own race. Unless Whites stop being a bunch of grovelling
cowards, afraid of being called "racist" by a bunch of (essentially)
left-wing Marxist thugs, and start standing up for themselves AS A
RACE, Whites will utterly lose the country and civilization that they
founded and built, and will be persecuted to near extinction.
  #30   Report Post  
Old April 29th 10, 10:22 PM posted to alt.news-media,alt.politics.elections,alt.politics.usa,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 40
Default Whose Country is This?


"DEFCON 88" wrote in message
...
On Apr 27, 11:46 pm, Kevin Alfred Strom kevin.st...@revilo-
oliver.com wrote:
Cicero Venatio wrote:
S
.
.
I wonder who in AZ provides employment for a half million people?


Throw a few of these employers in jail and their fellow criminal
employers will fire all of the half million illegals.


-----------
not that easy. If you want a law suit filed against you for racial
discrimination by the state or the feds, or you could be sued by
Chicanos por la Causa or La Raza for being racist. Also all of these
people have documentation, it may be forged documentation, but how can
you tell. Simple solutions are for simpletons. The flaw in the
e-verify system was there was no picture of the individual in the
database, but maybe in the future they will have some sort of system
where employers can actually find out if the employee is illegal or
not.
When the feds bust an employer, they actually have some pictures that
go with the social security numbers, something the employer had no
access to. Sound unfair, or course it is. BTW, do the feds have a
picture of you, "Sid9"? If not an illegal could have a forged a social
security card with "Sid9" "555-11-5555" or whatever your number is, and
how would the employer tell if it was you or someone else, unless there
is a picture to go with it?


The answer is to go back to what America had prior to 1965: a
national origins based immigration system (wherein immigration from
any country was allowed only to the extent of that nationality's
percentage of the already existing American population), and a
race-based definition of citizenship (see the Naturalization Act of
1790, in force until the 1950s). Under such a system, no complicated
set of ID documents would be required -- just a good pair of eyes.

Of course, Central Americans of European descent would easily be
able to sneak through -- but then, they aren't the ones causing
problems, are they?

I know that the Arizona (and other) patriots who want to stop the
invasion from the south fall all over themselves denying that they
have any racial motivation. But if all they really care about is
"what's legal," they might as well quit all their fussing and go
home and watch "Dancing With the Stars."

For "what is legal" can change in a nanosecond -- the moment the
criminals in Washington declare their "amnesty," every invader will
instantaneously become "legal."

And then what will the patriots do? Become honest, and admit that
this is a biological issue, of one people displacing another people
and taking their territory and resources? I hope so. Without
honesty, no solution is possible.

With all good wishes,

Kevin Alfred Strom.
--http://kevinalfredstrom.com/- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Agreed! The non-Whites who are chimping-out over Arizona's law freely
admit that their main concern is for their RACE. The unspoken truth is
that this is a non-White vs White, as is so many other political
issues these days. Non-Whites are not afraid to stand up and organize
for their own race. Unless Whites stop being a bunch of grovelling
cowards, afraid of being called "racist" by a bunch of (essentially)
left-wing Marxist thugs, and start standing up for themselves AS A
RACE, Whites will utterly lose the country and civilization that they
founded and built, and will be hunted to extinction by the non-Whites
who are just itching to destroy the USA.

..
..
A classic example of fear and paranoia!

Because he/she is uneducated and incapable of doing anything useful, he/she
fears these illegal immigrant farm workers


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ask Not What Your Country Can Do To You? Editor RadioTalkingPoints Shortwave 6 October 17th 09 07:59 PM
New Country on The Air dxAce Shortwave 4 March 3rd 07 03:23 PM
What country? H Davis Shortwave 2 November 26th 04 12:42 AM
Is this a great country or what? Jim Akins Shortwave 12 November 9th 03 10:26 PM
4W - a new country ? Rick Murphy Dx 3 August 20th 03 06:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017