Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tookin mee ah leetl cig anna ah coffee bareaque frum woikin onnas mah
howis.(House, iffin y'all cats dont's nose wuts dat T'IS) LQQKA hyr, dee reeson most Wealthy peepuls issa Wealthy issa bercos dey izza Smart anna oilso Intelligent anna oilso ahgin, dey know how to Invest their Money.They Earned their Money and their Wealth and they have the Right to do as they wish with their Money and Wealth. Pssssst, I am looking for a rich old woman.If you know of a rich old widow woman, send her over here to me! cuhulin |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 19, 11:49Â*am, "D. Peter Maus" wrote:
On 5/19/10 13:30 , DEFCON 88 wrote: On May 19, 8:59 am, Â*wrote: ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote: One of the many shallow statements that sound good-- if you don't stop and think about it-- is that "at some point, you have made enough money." . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amassing wealth beyond your needs is immoral and Unamerican. Nonsense. Restricting people's freedom to acquire as much wealth as they want (unless obtained through criminal activity) is immoral and Unamerican, and reeks of the typical jealousy of success exhibited by the Communist liberal/"progressive" left. Family dynasties are Unamerican. You mean like the Kennedys? Â* Â*The Rockefellers?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What I think he means is, that American Dynasties based on wealth come ominously close to European Dynasties (or any other dynasties in liberty-regressive nations) based on wealth, or power, or inherited status. Ultimately, at their core, is the concept that one family group amasses and maintains potentially undue power over others through whatever means is at their disposal (in this case money and political connection), and this is not at all what the Forefathers had in mind in their Cradle of Liberty. Having said that, I do have a soft spot for the Rockefellers - were it not for very altruistic latter generations of that family, we would have neither Acadia National Park nor the Jackson Hole district of Grand Teton National Park - both near and dear to my heart. Bruce Jensen |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The City of Angels (Los Angeles,California, there is another Los Angeles
in South America too) used to have a fine Trolley Car system many years ago.Along came that damn Rockefella SOB and he had those Trolley Car Rails ripped from the streets of the City of Angels. I have a soft back book here which I bought at the Books A Million Book store on I-55 North Frontage Road a bunch of years ago.That Book is all about the American Trolley Cars with a lot of photos too.Some of those old American built Trolley Cars were sold to South America.They, or some of them, are still running in South America. To HELL with those damn Rockefellars!!! cuhulin |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 19, 3:55*pm, wrote:
To HELL with those damn Rockefellars!!! cuhulin OK, so you DON'T like National Parks ;-) |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lookin lyke it's ahgwyna rain.Ahh reely orts tah mow mah yaryd tudey.Ahh
reckons Ahh weel gits ats its now. http://www.devilfinder.com Kevin Costner's Centrifuge Invention Furr cleanin uppa dat British POLLUTION Crap in the Gulf of Mexico. cuhulin |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DEFCON 88 wrote:
On May 19, 8:59 am, dave wrote: ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote: One of the many shallow statements that sound good-- if you don't stop and think about it-- is that "at some point, you have made enough money." . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amassing wealth beyond your needs is immoral and Unamerican. Nonsense. Restricting people's freedom to acquire as much wealth as they want (unless obtained through criminal activity) is immoral and Unamerican, and reeks of the typical jealousy of success exhibited by the Communist liberal/"progressive" left. I proposed no laws restricting anyone's ability to amass a fortune. Family dynasties are Unamerican. You mean like the Kennedys? Exactly. And the Bushes. |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I said Smart and Intelligent Wealthy people, that leaves OUT ALL
politicians,,, some of those Hollyweird people too! Kevin Costner and Clint Eastwood are Smart and Intelligent and Wealthy, so is Sean Connery and a bunch of other people.Sean Connery grew up in a slum area of Edinburgh,Scotland.There is also an Edinburg,(without the h) Mississippi. http://www.devilfinder.com Edinburg,Mississippi Now, lets me gits bak tu ahwoikin onna mah howis, soon as Ahh takes doggy out en teh fryont yahrd furr ah few minits. cuhulin |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 19, 5:59Â*am, dave wrote:
∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote: One of the many shallow statements that sound good-- if you don't stop and think about it-- is that "at some point, you have made enough money." Amassing wealth beyond your needs is immoral and Unamerican. Family dynasties are Unamerican. Growth is another name for tumor. Unlimited wealth is permissible if you are a Democrat. Democrats will share their wealth with you. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 19, 5:59Â*am, dave wrote:
∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote: One of the many shallow statements that sound good-- if you don't stop and think about it-- is that "at some point, you have made enough money." Amassing wealth beyond your needs is immoral and Unamerican. Family dynasties are Unamerican. Growth is another name for tumor. Obama has the right idea. His half brother lives in a dirt florr hut with no running water and his Aunt is on welfare in Boston. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|