DEFCON 88 wrote:
On May 19, 9:47 am, Kevin Alfred Strom
wrote:
dave wrote:

[...]



[...]


Escape from the current oligarchy can come only from a new elite
with different values -- and high biological quality.


With all good wishes,

Kevin Alfred Strom.
--http://kevinalfredstrom.com/


What should those different values and higher biological qualities
be?






As far as values are concerned: A sense of peoplehood is essential
-- and a sense of peoplehood necessitates race consciousness, since
nations are biological entities, not mental or geographic ones.

With a sense of peoplehood -- of who "we" are -- and the ability to
see that the survival and progress of our people should be our
highest moral values, trumping all others, we have a _chance_ of
survival. Without those values, there is no hope: Healthier peoples
will displace us and swamp us -- physically, culturally, and
genetically.

As for biological quality:

Life, for all living beings, is a struggle for the right to pass our
genes on to future generations.

Some human groups have less frontal lobe capabilities than we do,
but are far more fecund and loyal to their kind on average than we are.

Others have slightly higher IQs than us on average, but less
tendency to produce creative geniuses.

Only time will tell which is the best strategy. There have always
been races and varieties of men (just as there have always been
varieties of birds or wheat or squirrels), for as long as there have
been men on this planet.

As in the days of _homo neanderthalis_ and his competitors -- and as
in the days of the several races of _homo erectus_ -- some of the
branches of humanity will succeed and continue to evolve and branch
yet further... and others will go extinct.

The best strategy for our people being among the former is, I think,
positive eugenics. This does not at all mean a society more coercive
than ours is. It just means rewarding people with high character and
intelligence and creativity for having children -- and rewarding
those with a lack of those characteristics for not having children.
(This could ultimately lead to a dramatic reduction in societal
coercion, since people of high intelligence and character and
responsibility don't need many laws or policemen or prisons, nor do
they generally want them.)

I believe that the nation that adopts positive eugenics on a large
enough scale will advance and prosper at a rapid and compounding
rate. It could possibly leave the rest of us behind to the same
extent that _erectus_ was left behind once true humans emerged --
and refused to mate with the lower types.


With all good wishes,


Kevin Alfred Strom.
--
http://kevinalfredstrom.com/

"ZNUYBV" wrote in message
...
On May 19, 5:59 am, dave wrote:
∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote:
One of the many shallow statements that sound good-- if you don't stop
and think about it-- is that "at some point, you have made enough
money."

Amassing wealth beyond your needs is immoral and Unamerican.

Family dynasties are Unamerican.

Growth is another name for tumor.

Obama has the right idea. His half brother lives in a dirt florr hut
with no running water and his Aunt is on welfare in Boston.
..
..
A stupid diversion from the subject.

Try to concentrate.

ZNUYBV wrote:
On May 19, 5:59 am, dave wrote:


Growth is another name for tumor.

Unlimited wealth is permissible if you are a Democrat. Democrats will
share their wealth with you.

I am an NP. Money doesn't really exist. All is phony.

On May 20, 3:16*pm, dave wrote:
ZNUYBV wrote:
On May 19, 5:59 am, dave wrote:

Growth is another name for tumor.

Unlimited wealth is permissible if you are a Democrat. *Democrats will
share their wealth with you.

I am an NP. *Money doesn't really exist. *All is phony.

A Non-Profit? What a sweet deal! ;-)

On 05/20/2010 03:39 PM, Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
The best strategy for our people being among the former is, I think,
positive eugenics. This does not at all mean a society more coercive
than ours is. It just means rewarding people with high character and
intelligence and creativity for having children -- and rewarding those
with a lack of those characteristics for not having children. (This
could ultimately lead to a dramatic reduction in societal coercion,
since people of high intelligence and character and responsibility don't
need many laws or policemen or prisons, nor do they generally want them.)

I believe that the nation that adopts positive eugenics on a large
enough scale will advance and prosper at a rapid and compounding rate.
It could possibly leave the rest of us behind to the same extent that
_erectus_ was left behind once true humans emerged -- and refused to
mate with the lower types.
Aristotle:"Most men are such slaves to passion they'd do better in the
hands of a more rational master". Politics claims, but fails, to produce
that master.

Reading Cosmopolitan and Glamour to see what young women are being told,
I find raps about them giving up on ever meeting "Mr. Wright" and going
to fertility clinics. They wont have the perfect marriage, but are very
happy with the perfect baby.

Upscale white thirty something career women, no longer sexy hotties are
increasingly doing this, and no doubt, raising the first generation of
the Uberwench.

But in the name of equal opportunity, we should subsidize fertility
clinics for poor women and provide DNA analysis. If need be, provide in
vitro so these women, who have repeatedly shown us they can raise kids
on little money, would be far more rewarded for their effort later in
life as successful children will be better able to look after momma.
Even if mom's skin is darker.

There's lotsa stories from the Robber Baron era of successful men who
took very good care of their black nannies later in life. This just
moves that process up 9 months. It'd reduce the cost of premature
infants so much that alone would be justify fertility clinic services.

Make it available to illegal women. the men who think they own these
women will ship them back to the old country ASAP rather than using them
to produce anchor babies.

In article ,
"Sid9" wrote:

"ZNUYBV" wrote in message
...
On May 19, 5:59 am, dave wrote:
?baMa? Tse Dung wrote:
One of the many shallow statements that sound good-- if you don't stop
and think about it-- is that "at some point, you have made enough
money."

Amassing wealth beyond your needs is immoral and Unamerican.

Family dynasties are Unamerican.

Growth is another name for tumor.

Obama has the right idea. His half brother lives in a dirt florr hut
with no running water and his Aunt is on welfare in Boston.
.
.
A stupid diversion from the subject.

Try to concentrate.


IIRC, Obama, in his inaugural address, proclaimed, "I am my brother's
keeper."

Yet another dissembling from him.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.

bpnjensen wrote:
On May 20, 3:16 pm, wrote:
ZNUYBV wrote:
On May 19, 5:59 am, wrote:

Growth is another name for tumor.

Unlimited wealth is permissible if you are a Democrat. Democrats will
share their wealth with you.

I am an NP. Money doesn't really exist. All is phony.

A Non-Profit? What a sweet deal! ;-)

No party. But I'm going to join the Green Party.

On May 21, 6:17*am, dave wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:
On May 20, 3:16 pm, *wrote:
ZNUYBV wrote:
On May 19, 5:59 am, *wrote:

Growth is another name for tumor.

Unlimited wealth is permissible if you are a Democrat. *Democrats will
share their wealth with you.

I am an NP. *Money doesn't really exist. *All is phony.

A Non-Profit? *What a sweet deal! ;-)

No party. *But I'm going to join the Green Party.

Welcome to the club! :-)

Arrah,,,

http://www.devilfinder.com
The Moving Wall Jackson,Mississippi May 2010

Going to call a few of my old buddys and see if they want to go.
I need to buy a film cartridge for my Kodak film camera/picture box!
cuhulin

On 10-05-20 02:39 PM, Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:

As far as values are concerned: A sense of peoplehood is essential --
and a sense of peoplehood necessitates race consciousness, since nations
are biological entities, not mental or geographic ones.


I've noticed the 'biological entity' business earlier. Corporations,
Large organizations and Political parties exhibit the same
characteristic. As in a living body, there is a need for nourishment and
growth. The antibodies are always at work.

Maintaining Income/Money flow replaces food/water. Growth is mandatory.
New cells may be added through procreation or recruitment. Public
relations become the camouflage device of choice and as always, the
inner, not-so-wholesome workings aren't visible to the world at large.
Much like the intestines of a Supermodel.

Survival is at the top of the list. These 'biological' entities will
defend individual 'cells' or 'units' or 'employees' up to a degree. If
the Brain unit realizes that maintaining this defense will cost too
dearly, the member is chewed off and left. A Politician/TV Evangelist
with his leg in a corruption/morality trap is a fine example.

First, the cellular denial stage: "I have done nothing wrong.". Then the
Body attempts defense: "We have to wait for all the facts to be in
before we pass judgment.". Things then rot further and the disreputable
cell is surgically removed and all visible ties severed.

The act of complete remorse, feigned or genuine, may sometimes act as a
healing agent. Exhibiting free flowing tears helps the process.



mike