Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 12:58*am, Krypsis wrote:
On 2/06/2010 2:31 PM, Gregg wrote: snip I am waiting on my post where I said that Kramer was gone before I started posting in rec knives. I will only answer to you when you can provide that post. Now go back to your corner. Lord, you're like a virus. Since I was already subscribed to rec.knives BEFORE you entered the scene, I'm telling you once and for all that Kramer was long gone from there. He no longer posted there when you first commenced posting in rec.knives. You saying that you had discussions with him in rec.knives is merely a product of your overly fertile imagination. Krypsis Bwahahahahaha - - -you old coot - have fun eating crow and please leave this group, you offer NOTHING to usenet but trouble. I noticed though that I contributed to rec knives ( I stopped counting) at over FIFTY THREE POSTS about knives and ON TOPIC!!! You, not even a handful while I was there. Just your typical crap you post everywhere on usenet. |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 9:36*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On Jun 1, 7:00 pm, Joe from *wrote: On 6/1/2010 5:52 PM, bpnjensen wrote: When I see crap from Gregg, I'll let him know it isn't appreciated... If you will permit me a small comment... ...every time you see a post from nurk_the_jerk and LarbGay, you ARE "seeing crap from Gregg". On 6/1/2010 10:23 PM, Gregg wrote: Joe, are you trying to say we are all one in the same? Let me explain it real slow. I was not implying that you are one and the same as the thugs you brought over. The point that I was trying to make is that you originally invited the goons over and that those turds are -still- here *AS -YOUR- PROXIES* and that every time Bruce saw a post from one of the turd twins, he was [indirectly] getting crap from you (as you were responsible for bringing them over). Nothing to do with me saying that you and the turds are one and the same. Get it now? Sorry for your confusion. let me clarify that a little more. My name is Gregg, that is the only screen name I post under. Oh, really? Whatever happened to BCBLazySusan, Bushcraft Gregg and all the others? (or did you really mean to say "that is the only screen name I -CURRENTLY- post under"?) Damn dude, I know you aren't that slow. It has been explained over and over again - you don't have to hit me over the head for me to know you just want to play along with your troublemaker friends. Have at it. Hope you enjoy the threads I provided that show how it REALLY started (like I said all along) and make sure to read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y because I'm not reposting this drivel again. |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 9:39*am, Krypsis wrote:
On 2/06/2010 11:36 PM, Joe from Kokomo wrote: On Jun 1, 7:00 pm, Joe from wrote: On 6/1/2010 5:52 PM, bpnjensen wrote: When I see crap from Gregg, I'll let him know it isn't appreciated... If you will permit me a small comment... ...every time you see a post from nurk_the_jerk and LarbGay, you ARE "seeing crap from Gregg". On 6/1/2010 10:23 PM, Gregg wrote: Joe, are you trying to say we are all one in the same? Let me explain it real slow. I was not implying that you are one and the same as the thugs you brought over. The point that I was trying to make is that you originally invited the goons over and that those turds are -still- here *AS -YOUR- PROXIES* and that every time Bruce saw a post from one of the turd twins, he was [indirectly] getting crap from you (as you were responsible for bringing them over). Nothing to do with me saying that you and the turds are one and the same. Get it now? Sorry for your confusion. let me clarify that a little more. My name is Gregg, that is the only screen name I post under. Oh, really? Whatever happened to BCBLazySusan, Bushcraft Gregg and all the others? (or did you really mean to say "that is the only screen name I -CURRENTLY- post under"?) His new screen name, it would seem, is Anonymous. Krypsis- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Your busted, enjoy the three new threads you ding dong headed liar!!! :-D Like shooting fish in a barrel. |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/2/2010 7:52 PM, Gregg wrote:
Damn dude, I know you aren't that slow. It has been explained over and over again - you don't have to hit me over the head for me to know you just want to play along with your troublemaker friends. Have at it. Hope you enjoy the threads I provided that show how it REALLY started (like I said all along) and make sure to read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y because I'm not reposting this drivel again. How it "started"? Sorry, that's a non-issue. I don't care "how it started". YOU admitted YOU brought over the thugs. No need to go any further than that. Period. End of story. Let me give you a final (and very apt) analogy... Al Capone was a swell fella, never hurt a fly. But he brought in out-of-town thugs to do his dirty work. Is he just as guilty as the trigger men he brought in? According to American jurisprudence, yes, he is just as guilty. Nothing at all to do with "how it started" or are you and the turds the same person. I hope you finally see the parallel with you bringing over the turds and why I consider YOU the root of the trouble for bringing them over; I can't make it any simpler than the analogy above. "...make sure to read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y" Yes, please do. |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 8:39*pm, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 6/2/2010 7:52 PM, Gregg wrote: Damn dude, I know you aren't that slow. It has been explained over and over again - you don't have to hit me over the head for me to know you just want to play along with your troublemaker friends. Have at it. Hope you enjoy the threads I provided that show how it REALLY started (like I said all along) and make sure to read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y because I'm not reposting this drivel again. How it "started"? Sorry, that's a non-issue. I don't care "how it started". YOU admitted YOU brought over the thugs. No need to go any further than that. Period. End of story. Let me give you a final (and very apt) analogy... Al Capone was a swell fella, never hurt a fly. But he brought in out-of-town thugs to do his dirty work. Is he just as guilty as the trigger men he brought in? According to American jurisprudence, yes, he is just as guilty. Nothing at all to do with "how it started" or are you and the turds the same person. I hope you finally see the parallel with you bringing over the turds and why I consider YOU the root of the trouble for bringing them over; I can't make it any simpler than the analogy above. "...make sure to read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y" Yes, please do. When I got to Al Capone - Joe I have to be honest with you, I stopped reading. Have fun and remember radio!!! ;-) |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Johnny Cash, OVTV channel, right now.
Yeah, go onnnn downnnn to Jackson,,,, go ahead and wreak yourself,,,, We are going to Jacksonnnn,,,,, look outtt Jackson townnn,,,,,,, http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/music/index.html Uilleann Pipes.You can't play those Pipes standing up, you have to be seated. cuhulin |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 2, 8:41*pm, Gregg wrote:
When I got to Al Capone - Joe I have to be honest with you, I stopped reading. Have fun and remember radio!!! Yeah, reading must be a very taxing experience for you, Gregg. |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Jun 2, 8:39 pm, Joe from wrote: On 6/2/2010 7:52 PM, Gregg wrote: Damn dude, I know you aren't that slow. It has been explained over and over again - you don't have to hit me over the head for me to know you just want to play along with your troublemaker friends. Have at it. Hope you enjoy the threads I provided that show how it REALLY started (like I said all along) and make sure to read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y because I'm not reposting this drivel again. How it "started"? Sorry, that's a non-issue. I don't care "how it started". YOU admitted YOU brought over the thugs. No need to go any further than that. Period. End of story. Let me give you a final (and very apt) analogy... Al Capone was a swell fella, never hurt a fly. But he brought in out-of-town thugs to do his dirty work. Is he just as guilty as the trigger men he brought in? According to American jurisprudence, yes, he is just as guilty. Nothing at all to do with "how it started" or are you and the turds the same person. I hope you finally see the parallel with you bringing over the turds and why I consider YOU the root of the trouble for bringing them over; I can't make it any simpler than the analogy above. "...make sure to read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y" Yes, please do. On 6/2/2010 8:41 PM, Gregg wrote: When I got to Al Capone - Joe I have to be honest with you, I stopped reading. Have fun and remember radio!!! ;-) Yup, when someone makes a valid point that gets you dead to rights and fits you to a "T", put your head where the sun don't shine and go into the 'ignore' mode. Sounds like a plan! ;-) |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mike wrote: On Jun 2, 8:41 pm, Gregg wrote: When I got to Al Capone - Joe I have to be honest with you, I stopped reading. Have fun and remember radio!!! Yeah, reading must be a very taxing experience for you, Gregg. Lying about having a PhD was pretty easy for you, 'tard boy! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bruce Williams on BCB ? | Shortwave | |||
Bruce and me | Shortwave | |||
Bruce Bradley | Broadcasting | |||
Will PCTA Censure Bruce? | Policy |