On Jul 3, 10:44*am, Krypsis wrote:
On 3/07/2010 11:13 PM, Gregg wrote:

On Jul 3, 5:20 am, *wrote:
Gregg,

Mike,

I will absolutely guarantee you that I don't smoke dope.

You can "absolutely guarantee" me nothing pal. I can PROMISE you this
Mike, if you had the info of what I KNOW -

So I take it you saw it? That my dear fellow is about the only way you
could "know" with any certainty that which you profess to know. When you
hear it from others it is "hearsay"! Hearsay is not proven fact!

- *not only of what went down "out there" *-

* - but other pertininent info on you - -if it was

all reversed around you would have said something longgggg
ago.....just be careful. And I will admit this much, when I was new to
the computer you "scared me" - not in the "you are going to whoop my
ass" - because that....how do I say it? Me on my worst day and you on
your best....ain't happening. But I was new and was warned of lunatics
and spiteful people and in some cases - things got "literally"
personal on usenet from what I was told/warned at times and I knew
enough about your writing and style (through my years of studying said

You?? *Years of studying? *Just how many years did they have you repeat
kindergarten???
Really Gregg, your writing style is that of someone quite uneducated!

things) that I wanted to know what I may be dealing with. Of course, I
found out what a nut you are from your own vitriol, not the dangerous
kind - but simply someone who wants to be even bigger than they really
are - like I guess most of us do at times in all honesty. And my

So, that makes Mike a nut and, quite obviously you as well. Hmmmm

checking started before, not right before.....but close to five months
before your last fiasco with me when I decided enough was enough and
Krypsie was introduced into the crotch of your pants and vice versa.

Have you got a fetish going about the crotch of Mike's pants?? That
would explain a lot! Jilted lovers do get quite nasty!



Because I know MY character in comparison towards yours. If you knew
about me what I know about you.....you would be changing screen names
and going through an anonymous newsgroup and "dumping it" for everyone
to see.

The mere fact that Mike hasn't dumped his standard screen name says more
positive things about him than it does about you!



Like I have said over five times ( I think ) - it is just your nature.
It isn't mine. But I know nothing is slander if it's the truth. That
IS the bottom LEGAL line and trust me....please if you haven't ever
listened to anyone on usenet before.....trust me....I am the wrong one
to mess with when it comes to getting info. Now if you want to employ

Ah, usenet threats now eh?





the ole' challenge you did to Ace a while back - I will accept that
challenge on my own timetable and "dump it" when I see fit and how I
see fit and to who I see fit. Kinda like my fake "Premium RX' ;-) This
isn't me "getting with friends to find out info" or a "49.99 Info
Check" or all the stupid kinds of background checks on the internet.
Those are childs play and show nothing to me that I can't find out on
my own in one hour to an hour an a half of my own time. Those kinds of
checks only scratch the surface and in some cases - if someone was
busted for something years back - that doesn't mean that is how they
are today and I don't hold that against them. EVERYONE (including me)
has skeletons in their closet. EVERYONE (including me) try an "show
their best face" in meeting someone for the first time. But I learned
a while back that people aren't always what they appear to be (burned-
not since though) and I find it fascinating.....and I'll even go as
far as to say (like I said with The Bankok Banger and don't get a big
head) that I find you fascinating also. I really do.

Yes, Confirmed! A jilted lover! Gregg, move on man! Mike's not the only
man you could love!



I let you do it to me for yearssss and took your pot shots at not just
me (I can handle that) but you took them at my faith and you took them
at my God and yours -

Ah, your "belief system" has been placed under siege and that you see as
a personal attack upon yourself!

* - and I'm not even including the political crap

which in a way.....neither poster or postee is going to change anyones

Another "belief system"





mind. No one changes anyones mind on usenet, there may be a few - my
mind was changed on one subject matter some years back - but it
doesn't happen much in regards to anyones thought process.

I'm tired
of your lies suggesting I do.

Watch it. ;-) And it depends on what you mean "suggesting" means.

Personally, I don't think there's
anything wrong with doing so

Of course. We all know that by your actions where you had no choice
BUT to admit it. But why was it that - for years before you got busted
out at Weber St. with the male student (Danny) in your hotel room that
you railed and railed on anyone that did drugs in RRS and other
groups? Now, I don't know THAT for a fact, but I know it was said time
and time again that you spoke up against drugs till you got busted and

It was "said time and time again"!
Did you SEE it or was it hearsay?

that's why many reveled in your bust and called you a hypocrite (I
could waste more of my time to find it- if you say otherwise though)
If I am wrong or slightly mistaken about that....I expect you to
correct me and I will apologize, because I don't like when things are
said about meheh *that aren't true and posted by 'someone' that is
attempting to make the group feel it is someone else. ;-)

So when are you putting your new sockpuppet into action?



but I make sure my students know
that if they do, they need to stop.

Huh? Either you are FLAT OUT LYING AGAIN or one or more of your
students questioned you about the facts they know about you from Weber
St. in Utah where you were arrested on a school sponsored event and
found to be in possesion of pot and paraphenalia in a hotel room with
a male student.

You were the arresting officer??



I don't like to tell much of my personal history, because -

You don't have much of a personal history!

well....that is my personal history. I did seven years in college (not
in a row) and NOT ONE TIME did I ever have a teacher ......or know of
one who had a teacher (and I would have known-bank on it) that said "I
make sure my students know if they do (drugs)....they need to stop".

Seven years in college? Gregg, those remedial literacy classes did you
no good. I'd ask for my enrolment fees back if I were you!



Why is it that in my short time of knowing you - that I reach a lot of
"firsts"? Like I said a couple of days ago, I have NEVER heard of a
teacher....and I will add....or know of someone that knows someone
that is a PROVEN teacher.....on usenet that spouts off about
awards.....or even that they are a college teacher and ESPECIALLY with
your history on usenet and the personal vendettas and outright mean
and spiteful things you say about ANYONE that does not agree with you
or questions you and you don't like it.

Between you and steve, you both really have a history of personal
vendettas against anyone who does not agree with you!



95% of my students will be
starting professional careers after graduating - they need to
be prepared for substance abuse testing as a condition of
employment and random drug tests on the technological jobs
they'll be starting in.

Huh? ROTF - why was it that my teacher/teachers ******NEVER********
said anything to anyone (that I know of) about substance abuse or
randoms? And the advantage I have over you in saying this - is that I

Gregg, that was because they didn't expect a kindergarten dropout to be
aware of such things and deemed it unnecessary!

DO KNOW what you do for a living and you DON'T know what I do. I'm in

What does it matter? It would be a low wage, low skill requirement job
anyway!

one of MANY fields (from my schooling) that deal with liars everyday -
it's just part of the job, from itty bitty white lies -- --too lying

"too lying"????

by omission - - *too looking you square in the eyes and lying to your

"too looking"???

face". Nothing was ever said to anyone of us about randoms/testing
because it's freeking common sense UNLESS the one telling you is
"giving you the low down" so too speak from personal experience
because they don't want to happen to you what happened to
them....lol.

Man, this is one hell of a convoluted sentence Gregg! *Did you not learn
anything about sentence structure in your remedial literacy classes?
Certainly you learnt naught of punctuation!



If you send me your address, I'll be happy to send you copies
of my quarterly blood tests from my physician.

Do you really think for a minute Michael, that I would send you my
address? I mean, really do you? Of course not.rolling my eyes *This

Because you're scared of Michael???



is simply another ploy or head game to try an convince people in this
group and "others" that "may be" reading your mumbo jumbo to buy what
you're trying to sell. I know what you're capable of if push came to
shove.....just via internet - (I see what you have said to and about
Steve/Peter/Kevin and countless others over the years- worse in
vitriol than Kramer). You made fun of Peter losing use of a leg and
you made fun of someones family member commiting suicide - not face to
face though - no matter how skilled you feel you are in debating. I
don't debate. I deal with facts and there is no debate or grey area
when dealing with me when it comes to someone such as yourself. There
is NO WAY POSSIBLE *anyone* could EVER bring a defamation case against
me via usenet through my ISP or in real life face to face dealings -
because I go overboard

...

read more »- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

When are you going to understand Robin? I DO NOT read your
posts....lol...as soon as I see it is you in response to me I
automatically scroll to the bottom and either spank your bottom or
simply don't respond. I am just telling you this because if you REALLY
REALLY feel that ole' Gregg is actually reading your post.sigh it
ain't happening. You present no challenge whatsoever (I gave you your
shot), you are like two days ago garbage when it comes to your stink.
I don't want to smell it and I don't want to see it. So keep typing
away and hitting the send button you moron because I know YOU READ
EVERYTHING I type in EVERY group I post in.heh Whats that really
say? Ha! And again, don't bother answering unless you're trying to
impress your boyfriends. Ha Ha- supposed 70 + yr. old playing on
usenet, only in Australia.shaking my head

On 4/07/2010 3:28 PM, Gregg wrote:
On Jul 3, 10:44 am, wrote:
On 3/07/2010 11:13 PM, Gregg wrote:

snip


When are you going to understand Robin? I DO NOT read your
posts....lol...as soon as I see it is you in response to me I

Gregg, you do read my posts. You are a troll! You get your jollies from
the havoc you wreak in newsgroups. It's an imperative that you read and
reread the fruits of your labours. It's what you live for. Shortwave
radio is a secondary matter with you.

automatically scroll to the bottom and either spank your bottom or

You're way too kinky Gregg!

simply don't respond. I am just telling you this because if you REALLY
REALLY feel that ole' Gregg is actually reading your post.sigh it

I'll give you a clue Gregg! I don't give a damn whether YOU read my
posts! Others do and, by now, have worked out what a troll you really
are. I must admit, you haven't made it too difficult!

ain't happening. You present no challenge whatsoever (I gave you your
shot), you are like two days ago garbage when it comes to your stink.

Sticks and stones!

I don't want to smell it and I don't want to see it. So keep typing

You may not want to but you cannot resist!

away and hitting the send button you moron because I know YOU READ
EVERYTHING I type in EVERY group I post in.heh Whats that really

Not every group Gregg! No need! You crosspost the same posts to multiple
newsgroups so there's no need to read multiple iterations of the same post.

say? Ha! And again, don't bother answering unless you're trying to
impress your boyfriends.

Gregg, it's you who have boyfriends! You and your troll buddies. In
fact, you're obsessed by "boyfriends". You can't get your mind away from
the concept! You must have recently "come out"!

Ha Ha- supposed 70 + yr. old playing on
usenet, only in Australia.shaking my head

I hadn't realised that the USA had an age limit on usenet. We don't
appear to have such a thing here in Australia!

From what I can determine, most people of middle age or greater tend to
usenet as a means of discourse. People of more tender years tend to
facebook like forums and web chatrooms. That's why I'm surprised to see
you here in usenet!

Krypsis

dave wrote:

The innocent have nothing to hide.




I'm going to try this. It may work better than Wine, I don't know.

http://dlc.sun.com/virtualbox/vboxdownload.html





mike

On Jul 4, 1:28*am, Gregg wrote:

When are you going to understand Robin? I DO NOT read your
posts....lol...as soon as I see it is you in response to me I
automatically scroll to the bottom and either spank your bottom or
simply don't respond. I am just telling you this because if you REALLY
REALLY feel that ole' Gregg is actually reading your post.sigh it
ain't happening. You present no challenge whatsoever (I gave you your
shot), you are like two days ago garbage when it comes to your stink.
I don't want to smell it and I don't want to see it. So keep typing
away and hitting the send button you moron because I know YOU READ
EVERYTHING I type in EVERY group I post in.heh *Whats that really
say? Ha! And again, don't bother answering unless you're trying to
impress your boyfriends. Ha Ha- supposed 70 + yr. old playing on
usenet, only in Australia.shaking my head

Be careful about shaking that head so much. It seems to be barely
attached. No shock here that you dont (/can't) read posts. No,
not surprising, at all.

Mike

On Jul 3, 10:51*am, Mike wrote:
On Jul 3, 9:13*am, Gregg wrote:

On Jul 3, 5:20*am, Mike wrote:

Gregg,

Mike,

I will absolutely guarantee you that I don't smoke dope.

You can "absolutely guarantee" me nothing pal. I can PROMISE you this
Mike, if you had the info of what I KNOW - - *not only of what went
down "out there" *- - but other pertininent info on you - -if it was
all reversed around you would have said something longgggg
ago.....just be careful. And I will admit this much, when I was new to
the computer you "scared me" - not in the "you are going to whoop my
ass" - because that....how do I say it? Me on my worst day and you on
your best....ain't happening. But I was new and was warned of lunatics
and spiteful people and in some cases - things got "literally"
personal on usenet from what I was told/warned at times and I knew
enough about your writing and style (through my years of studying said
things) that I wanted to know what I may be dealing with. Of course, I
found out what a nut you are from your own vitriol, not the dangerous
kind - but simply someone who wants to be even bigger than they really
are - like I guess most of us do at times in all honesty. And my
checking started before, not right before.....but close to five months
before your last fiasco with me when I decided enough was enough and
Krypsie was introduced into the crotch of your pants and vice versa.

Because I know MY character in comparison towards yours. If you knew
about me what I know about you.....you would be changing screen names
and going through an anonymous newsgroup and "dumping it" for everyone
to see.

Like I have said over five times ( I think ) - it is just your nature.
It isn't mine. But I know nothing is slander if it's the truth. That
IS the bottom LEGAL line and trust me....please if you haven't ever
listened to anyone on usenet before.....trust me....I am the wrong one
to mess with when it comes to getting info. Now if you want to employ
the ole' challenge you did to Ace a while back - I will accept that
challenge on my own timetable and "dump it" when I see fit and how I
see fit and to who I see fit. Kinda like my fake "Premium RX' ;-) This
isn't me "getting with friends to find out info" or a "49.99 Info
Check" or all the stupid kinds of background checks on the internet.
Those are childs play and show nothing to me that I can't find out on
my own in one hour to an hour an a half of my own time. Those kinds of
checks only scratch the surface and in some cases - if someone was
busted for something years back - that doesn't mean that is how they
are today and I don't hold that against them. EVERYONE (including me)
has skeletons in their closet. EVERYONE (including me) try an "show
their best face" in meeting someone for the first time. But I learned
a while back that people aren't always what they appear to be (burned-
not since though) and I find it fascinating.....and I'll even go as
far as to say (like I said with The Bankok Banger and don't get a big
head) that I find you fascinating also. I really do.

I let you do it to me for yearssss and took your pot shots at not just
me (I can handle that) but you took them at my faith and you took them
at my God and yours - - and I'm not even including the political crap
which in a way.....neither poster or postee is going to change anyones
mind. No one changes anyones mind on usenet, there may be a few - my
mind was changed on one subject matter some years back - but it
doesn't happen much in regards to anyones thought process.

I'm tired
of your lies suggesting I do.

Watch it. ;-) And it depends on what you mean "suggesting" means.

Personally, I don't think there's
anything wrong with doing so

Of course. We all know that by your actions where you had no choice
BUT to admit it. But why was it that - for years before you got busted
out at Weber St. with the male student (Danny) in your hotel room that
you railed and railed on anyone that did drugs in RRS and other
groups? Now, I don't know THAT for a fact, but I know it was said time
and time again that you spoke up against drugs till you got busted and
that's why many reveled in your bust and called you a hypocrite (I
could waste more of my time to find it- if you say otherwise though)
If I am wrong or slightly mistaken about that....I expect you to
correct me and I will apologize, because I don't like when things are
said about me heh that aren't true and posted by 'someone' that is
attempting to make the group feel it is someone else. ;-)

but I make sure my students know
that if they do, they need to stop.

Huh? Either you are FLAT OUT LYING AGAIN or one or more of your
students questioned you about the facts they know about you from Weber
St. in Utah where you were arrested on a school sponsored event and
found to be in possesion of pot and paraphenalia in a hotel room with
a male student.

I don't like to tell much of my personal history, because -
well....that is my personal history. I did seven years in college (not
in a row) and NOT ONE TIME did I ever have a teacher ......or know of
one who had a teacher (and I would have known-bank on it) that said "I
make sure my students know if they do (drugs)....they need to stop".

Why is it that in my short time of knowing you - that I reach a lot of
"firsts"? Like I said a couple of days ago, I have NEVER heard of a
teacher....and I will add....or know of someone that knows someone
that is a PROVEN teacher.....on usenet that spouts off about
awards.....or even that they are a college teacher and ESPECIALLY with
your history on usenet and the personal vendettas and outright mean
and spiteful things you say about ANYONE that does not agree with you
or questions you and you don't like it.

95% of my students will be
starting professional careers after graduating - they need to
be prepared for substance abuse testing as a condition of
employment and random drug tests on the technological jobs
they'll be starting in.

Huh? ROTF - why was it that my teacher/teachers ******NEVER********
said anything to anyone (that I know of) about substance abuse or
randoms? And the advantage I have over you in saying this - is that I
DO KNOW what you do for a living and you DON'T know what I do. I'm in
one of MANY fields (from my schooling) that deal with liars everyday -
it's just part of the job, from itty bitty white lies -- --too lying
by omission - - *too looking you square in the eyes and lying to your
face". Nothing was ever said to anyone of us about randoms/testing
because it's freeking common sense UNLESS the one telling you is
"giving you the low down" so too speak from personal experience
because they don't want to happen to you what happened to
them....lol.

If you send me your address, I'll be happy to send you copies
of my quarterly blood tests from my physician.

Do you really think for a minute Michael, that I would send you my
address? I mean, really do you? Of course not.rolling my eyes This
is simply another ploy or head game to try an convince people in this
group and "others" that "may be" reading your mumbo jumbo to buy what
you're trying to sell. I know what you're capable of if push came to
shove.....just via internet - (I see what you have said to and about
Steve/Peter/Kevin and countless others over the years- worse in
vitriol than Kramer). You made fun of Peter losing use of a leg and
you made fun of someones family member commiting suicide - not face to
face though - no matter how skilled you feel you are in debating. I
don't debate. I deal with facts and there is no debate or grey area
when dealing with me when it comes to someone such as yourself. There
is NO WAY POSSIBLE *anyone* could EVER bring a defamation case against
me via usenet through my ISP or in real life face to face dealings -
because I go overboard in showing what I know and it makes it very
easy for a judge if the idiot is unrepresented and/or if he/she is
represented and their attorney takes a look in the "discovery" process
- it will stop right there unless I then want to flip things around.

These tests
have to be certified and will prove to you that you ought to
shut your mouth before I actually take a slander action
against you.

Number one buddy (and I don't mean it literally FWIW) - you better
watch that fresh mouth of yours. You aren't scaring me with that type
of talk. Know what the legal definition of slander is in both states
and in both states via internet. And not to get all technical with
you...lol....but the tests (drugs) aren't "certified" either - and
I'll go even further (not that it's that big a deal) in saying that I
don't buy that they draw blood either. It's just a urine. I mean, did
you just make a mistake in using that word (certified) or did you
think by using that word that it was going to make it that more
believable? I'll be honest AGAIN with you Michael, I don't know if you
get high. I really don't. It's not "up there" on my "thing to do
list". But I could. Ohhhhh believe me - when I say I could. :-) That
isn't a threat either, because I have no reason or inclination to find
out if you do, to be quite frank I could freeking care less. If you
didn't learn your lesson from the time you were caught till
now.....and be honest with ALL OF US IN HERE ......it's not like that
was the first time you ever got high while teaching at Weber St. was
it? I mean, lets get all our "honesty cards" out on the table, I
smoked pot before - I will be honest about it. I had to not only
submit a blood test but also a polygraph test with a follow up after
that. I think the last time I got high was when I was between nineteen
and twenty years old. I know I wasn't twenty one, I know that for a
fact. Because I grew up and came to the consensus THAT IT IS
ILLEGAL!!! But you just don't turn off at your age that "I am going to
stop because this is illegal or my livelihood". Studies actually show
that it entrenches that person EVEN MORE into it (if they get busted),
with the thinking of "no one is going to tell me what to do" - - - and
they make efforts to "work around it".....not saying you're doing that
either.....but most do. I am sure you are the ones that gave it up. I
truly hope you did.

You still awaiting that "Premium RX", Gregg? How long does
it take? Is it being shipped from Mars? I have several of
my top receivers being repaired by a tech in Michigan, for
free. I bet I get my radios back before you "claim" to
receive your's.

Ha! Damn, you've brought it up more than I have. You'd think you were
getting it. I know the list of your "top receivers" and NOT ONE is
considered a "Premium RX" - - again - - that there is the facts.
Forget my receiver Michael, this is all about you. :-)

Had my pictures taken today by a professional photo-
grapher for the award I'm receiving as the state's Most
Dramatic Lecturer.

Yeah, Kramer maybe? snort Michael, do you "really" think any of us
care....I mean "really"? LOL - I know I don't....lol...I see enough of
your "dramatics" and shuck and jive in here. Like I said before, you
could win ***Ky. Teacher Of The Century*** award and I wouldn't look
at you any different than I do now. That is a fact and I am sorry
(truly I am - really) if it hurts your feelings or doesn't give you
the lift or emotional jolt you were looking for when you typed that
and hit the send buttom.

But I couldn't help thinking about you.

I have got to ask you this....lol.sigh Do you "really" think about
Steve and myself like you say you do in many of your posts? I'm being
serious. I mean, when you're out in your world - do you HONESTLY think
of me? I don't feel flattered if the answer is yes, it really kinda
creeps me out, not in a scary way.....but I guess in a sad way. Please
Michael, when you get all these awards that you have worked so hard
for and finally attained - please don't think of me. Just think of how
many......errr never mind. But I can PROMISE YOU that I won't think
about you again till I log on and check my lists emails and two other
sites AND THEN I will log onto google. But this is the third group I
check, there are two others that take priority over this. ***THEN*** -
I will think of you when I am reading your crap.

You deserve an award as the Most Dramatic Nit-Wit in
Radio History!

Blah Blah Blah - that's it? shaking my head

Now, don't forget to suck up to Lare, today! You need to
impress your troll sock puppets...

Like you did your Weber St. students that you got high with more than
once / more than twice/ *more than three etc. etc. etc. that kind of
"sucking up....errr sucking in - oh never mind you know what I mean"?
Or do you mean "another" kind of sucking up?

[Yawn...]

Open that pouty little lower lip wide open, uh huh.snicker

- Show quoted text -

I knew it wouldn't take long for your knife-wielding "Rambo"
alter-ego to emerge! Here's another thing I teach students:
conciseness. Never take five thousand words to say what
you mean. It conveys uncertainty and outright deception.

Huh? Rambo? Really? Count how many words you have typed in this
post...lol...I have read posts of yours where I am literally just left
speechless and shaking my head. And to think you're using the ole'
noggin again...lol... to people that aren't that bright and make them
think the more someone types it conveys uncertainty or deception. You
are suchhhhhh a bull****ter. There are NO credible studies done in
that area that prove what you just said -- - like it was the truth.
There are in face to face studies but not in via communications by the
internet or even post a notes for that matter.You are a fraud and you
are lying again!! It's funny that you used to love me and I was your
pal (like Batman) when I was either not saying anything about you or
disagreeing with ones that spoke harshly about you. Why is that? I
mean, I know the answer but I want to see the crap you spew in
answering that simple question and it IS simple. :-)












I'll try to keep this response short. It should be easy.

No it isn't....lol.... but it is easy.


1. You're an idiot. You might be an idiot with bluster, but
you're an idiot.

**rolling my eyes** - and that is all you have to offer Brybaby? Clean
the orange Cheetos stains off your fingers and try again.
Hint...lol...I'm using an ole' "debate strategy". ;-)



2. You should know that they can detect THC via either urine
or blood.

AGAIN. You are lying. I will just leave it at that unless you don't
know what I know - - which I feel is why you either #1 Said what you
said or #2 In case "someone" is reading this - you can play like
Dumbo. I bet you told your "students"......errrr you're "friends" more
than what you just said here....lol. You may not like me pal because I
can call you on your bull**** - but I am a trained "bull**** sniffer"
and you qualify in that segment.


Both of mine are checked every two months by
my doctor for the last five years.

Huh? For what? Pot? ***BOTH*** your blood AND your urine as you just
stated above? Oh quit it...lol...tell it to someone else that
qualifies as a "window licker". If what you just said is true (which
it isn't) then it isn't a "random" as you said before.....come on
Brybaby - shuck and jive - move to the left and move to the right -
I'm a paid Hound Dog Bull****ter.sniff sniff

Remember, I had a
stroke five years ago.

No, I don't remember and I don't care. Try that technique on someone
else or when you "warm up" for a debate and shout it into your tape
recorder.shaking my head


Use your super-sleuth powers,
Greggbo. My insurance company requires certification
of the results.

AGAIN!!! You are full of ****. Learn to use the "simple" correct
words, they won't give the "dramatic" effect that you are fishing for
and the emotional tugs - - - but you will be respected moreheh by
the reader.


The offer stands. Give me a post office box
if you don't want to give out your address.

LOLOL - I'm not spending one nickel for a PO Box...lol. Buddy, I know
ALL ABOUT PO Boxes. There are things I know that I can promise you -
you don't. Or your phone number or your cell number or your license
plate and at least four other things I won't share here.



3. I'm also tired of your inferences that I'm gay.

And you do know the definition of said word inference in via
communications by the internet or even post a notes for that
matter.You are a fraud and you are lying again!! It's funny that you
used to love me and I was your pal (like Batman) when I was either not
saying anything about you or disagreeing with ones that spoke harshly
about you. Why is that? I mean, I know the answer but I want to see
the crap you spew in answering that simple question and it IS
simple. :-)




While
*there is nothing wrong with being gay, I am not.

I have NEVER once said you liked to swallow another man's cum or have
your butt penetrated by another man's penis. Like you said, there
nothing wrong with that. ;-) Oh quit it you big fat ding dong headed
liar. Yes, there is SOMETHING very wrong with it in the word OF GOD.
I'm not going to get all biblical about it, but the Lord said
(HIMSELF) that not only is it not right. But IT IS AN ABOMINATION!!!!
Does you simple computer Bible text/defintion check **** find out what
that word itself means in that EXACT context in (in the Hebrew) what
he stated and get back with me. Not that there is anything wrong with
that....spoken like the typical liberal....and I hate tagging specific
political affiliates because in the grand scheme of things - everyone
is lying to everyone else (just like the Bible said would happen) and
this country is going down to hell in a big ole' handbasket.


None
of your awesome detection has produced any evidence
to the contrary.

I love google, just for the fact that is shows the bull****ters like
you......even ten/fifteen years from now. Or someone will "bump one of
your threads" though you are rotting in the grave and have already
answered to your Lord and Savior. Your words and posts of
vindictiveness will be your usenet legacy. Me on the other hand, has
tried to be as nice as I can possibly be to anyone unless my repeated
requests go without snapping my fingers - can't think of the word
and won't be a phoney and type it in later.....but you know what I
mean. ;-) Then and only then - do I speak up. I'll let someone, both
in face to face dealings and via usenet mess with me. I'm all for
having a good time and making friends or letting someone think they
have the drop on me, but long ago you mistook my kindness as my
weakness and you couldn't have been farther from the the truth.

Evidence? Really? Are we gonna dance Mike? Give me the word here on
usenet. I will be "above board" and I will never say a thing here
about it in RRS. That just means - just what it means. Think it
through slowly, really think about it and try an swallow a tad of
whatever pride you have left down your gullet and try an not make this
too personal. It isn't going to hurt me, I can promise you that. I can
just dissapear from here or either ignore you and do the radio thing
and "dump it" and when I say that.....I mean just that. You will go
running to your fake attorney sister (I will find out about that
also ;-) And you will scream and bitch - but it will be through enough
anonymous servers in correlation with each other you wouldn't know if
your "garbage man" (catch that) posted it or a student in your own
class.heh This (I PRAYYYYY you believe me) - is the wrong person at
the wrong time you want to play reindeer games with. Really Michael. I
am being as nice as I can and trying to give you a way to save face.
Send me an email, and I will dissapear from RRS if you do for an
amount of time.. I pwomise.heh




My daughter still lives at home.

I don't care, but thanks for sharing I guess? rolling my eyes
Another part of the bull**** you have infested this group with? Now
you are going to include the daughter, I know psychology speaking what
that means.snicker **NOTHING** could/would ever surprise me about
you....lol. I could NEVER find out anything about you and in my mind
say ""Damn, I can't believe that". That says alot - believe me it
does. A daughter, but no wife living presently with you?trap laid A
daughter ALWAYS (in over 83% of studied cases) wants to be with their
Mommy. deeply thinking and accessing read material


I was a
debate coach for over 20 years.

Blah Blah Blah - nothing there of interest. And I threw a wiffleball
for thirty two. So?

That profession involves
extensive travel to tournaments on a fixed budget. All
debate coaches share rooms with their debaters while
on the road, often with four or five people packed in a
room. That's a fact that you could easily find out about.

AND YOU CHOSE THAT profession!!!!! I would have NEVER chosen that. I
am just a saved sinner and life is hard enough and I keep "prayed up"
- and I wouldn't put myself in that spot. You put yourself in a spot
that not "just doesn't look good" - but decided "Hey- I am just like
you kids". That is why teachers or pastors or people in power keep the
doors open with any type of sex nowadays....lol. ANY look of
impropriety is just that, if you KNEW HOW IT WOULD LOOK BUT CHOSE to
do it your way. Shuck and jive don't work here.




4. I tell my students not to smoke pot (or do other drugs)
because I teach Job Interviewing skills to inner city
students who are about to be starting high-tech jobs.
Many of them don't know that most jobs in KY require
drug screening and random testing. Those are also facts.

And AGAIN - I say "why"? No one ever said anything to any of my
classmates about that. Someone I have KNOWN PERSONALLY for eleven
years is part of that (KY job) and he was never told. He now (at least
till nine months ago- I can make a phone call and check) was a part of
the BATF in Louisville. It's a rather new "occupied area for them."
When you go down 71s and get off at the 2nd loop of GS - you continue
to go straight and you pass the big Ford Plant on your left side. I
know you know where I mean. ;-) On the right hand side of the HW you
will see (I think) three crosses for three dead boys that (of course)
died there.....and the next exit is a big loop and you have to be
careful and slow down - even on a sunny day....you come to a stop
sign.

You take a left and the small neighborhood is on your right and then
you go over a set of RR tracks - right after that you take a left into
the "business park". The first driveway on your right is to the
loading area of the BATF on the right side. You can't get more high
tech than what he did even BEFORE he went there.snicker We NEVER had
someone gives us the "low down" on drug tests..lol. But yet, you did
your students.shaking my head



I do admit to them that I've smoked pot, but try to share
with them the professional necessity of not doing so.

Yeah, whatever. Is that short of enough for you? ;-P

Many of them have thanked me for being being direct
and honest with them.

Uh huh. I will leave it at that. Just watch yourself. ;-)

You have alluded to my Linked In bio.
If you have read it, you should know what my students
(of both genders) say about me.

I don't know (on that Linkd site) and I don't care. I didn't "join"
because I don't have to- to find out info**BUT** I DO KNOW what some
of your "former students" think of yourself. Do you wanna play? People
(in general) like to talk.....especially when they know they're
getting older (and they have their own families and values) that "they
feel they were played". Many have developed their own belief systems
without a master'de'bator paving their
minds driveway so too speak. Do you want me to say names (from back
then) - that I could only know unless I only knew...lol. Or would you
go personally and professionally after them also? I bet you would. It
is just your nature. Two of the names ( that I know of) are now
changed....because they are now changed. ;-) I truly think it would be
in your best interest


*****The Rest of This Is Cooked So We don't Have To Read Anymore Of
Your Crap******

On Jul 3, 6:20*am, Gregg wrote:
On Jul 3, 7:27*am, RHF wrote:

On Jul 2, 6:18*pm, wrote:
- I aints no spy.
- cuhulin

No-But - Cuhulin many of your Posts here prove
that you are a One-Man Neighborhood Watch.
*.

He is and I love him for it.:-) You know, Doggie and the couch and the
van and the neighbors and the wimmins etc. etc. etc. oh - andwww.devilfinder.com

- Gotta be honest Cuh,
- I've never clicked on that link,
- I can find the devil without clicking on him,
- know what I mean Jelly Bean?

? YKWIMJB ?
http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.co...+Jelly+Bean%3F
You Know What I Mean - Jelly Bean ?

and now you know . . . ~ RHF

On Jul 3, 7:03*am, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Jul 2, 7:52 pm, *wrote:
wrote:
I aints no spy.
cuhulin

- - - The best agent is sometimes someone who
- - - is unaware that he is an agent.

- - Dave Your The Best ! ) ~ RHF

- My The Best what?

*correction*
Dave You Are "The Best" ! ) ~ RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...05bb9a5a1f1d1d

-wrt- The best _____* is sometimes someone who
is unaware that he is an _____*.

* Fill-in the _Blanks_ for yourself.

On Jul 3, 7:00*am, dave wrote:
Mike wrote:

You prove daily that you are truly brain dead. Now, go back
under your bridge. You stink, Troll.

Mike

- Why don't you just filter him out?

Dave - In a Game of Cat-and-Mouse . . .
Both Often Need Each Other :
Otherwise There Is NO Game.

it's mostly about being-in 'the game' ~ RHF

On Jul 3, 12:26*pm, Mike wrote:
On Jul 3, 8:22*am, dxAce wrote:



I don't tell "stories", dufus. I leave that sort of stuff to pathologically lying
clown 'tard academics such as yourself.

Interesting "stories" told by Steve La

1. I'm employed. (Disproven and finally admitted
to after caught posting logs 24 hours a day.)

2. I'm announcing that I am leaving this
newsgroup. (Didn't leave for a single day!)

3. While in the Navy, I actually helped in the
search for Pol Pot. (Later denied)

4. I just got through a long motorcycle trip.
(Later retracted after it was pointed out that it
might disqualify him from receiving disability)

5. I'm a Native American from the Miami tribe,
I don't worship God, but Native spirits, instead.
(Hogwash, you don't worship anything besides
your Drakes!)

We won't get into your supposed degrees or what
others have backchanneled me about your
departure from the Armed Forces.

You're sick, Steve. When you decide to finally
seek help, let me know. I'll do whatever I can to
help you.

Mike

Bwahahahahahhahahahahhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa - you are an *****ADMITTED
and CONVICTED******** not just a puffer of the weed but also supplier
of the weed to your college debate students at Weber St.rolling my
eyes Only in Amerika and now at Sullivan College of Technology &
Design in Louisville,Kentucky. rolling my eyes

On Jul 3, 12:15*pm, Mike wrote:
On Jul 3, 12:01*pm, dxAce wrote:

Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:

I really did have a stroke five years ago that left me unable to
walk, talk, or even swallow. Took a while to come back, but since
then I have gone through extensive therapy and medical
monitoring. Ask your cousin, Burr. I explained it all to him
during my rehab, when he was asking me to return to posting
on RRS. I disagree strongly with Burr's politics, but he does
have a heart.

Cry us a river, clown 'tard.

You are so full of **** that it is indeed pathological.

Go ahead, Steve. I'll wait while you check with Burr. I
want you to see that you, too, are full of excrement.
I mean it, Burr and I agree on little, but I still respect him
for being a human. You became some sort of alcoholic
reptile a long time ago.

Mike

You only respect him because you feel he has the brains of a salad
bowl (nothing personal Burr - I don't believe it). You Bryant DO NOT
RESPECT ANYONE on usenet unless you feel there is an advantage to you.
I do not believe you. Steve does not believe you. And numerous other
in RRS do not believe you. You provide NOTHING to this group.. :-(