On Aug 2, 6:12*pm, dave wrote:
VegasNightOwl wrote:
*wrote in message
...
VegasNightOwl wrote:

I guess the 9 times I copied it wasn't too bad considering it was a car
radio driving home. *I'm sure with a better setup, many more could be
copied.

VegasNightOwl

It's nothing compared to "Morning Edition" on the FM. Pretty much
wall-to-wall from 88.1-91.9

Or "All Things Considered" in the afternoon. *NPR has a very high presence
in the "educational channels" of the FM band. *Since it is cheap for the
stations to carry them and it's a "public service", why not.

VegasNightOwl

- NPR is not cheap if you carry the news magazines.
-*Well into 5 figures at least.

NPR and the Pubic {Non-Profit} Radio Stations
is Fooly Funded by indirect subsidies form all
the US Tax Payers :
* US Federal Grants
* US "Charitable" Foundation Grants
* Deductible Matching Donations from US Business
* Deductible Donations from Individuals {US Citizens}
They all Grant and Donate to Pay Lower Taxes and
You Pay More/Higher Taxes to make-up the difference.

NPR Subsidizing the Liberal Progressive Agenda
at the US Tax Payer's Expense ~ RHF

On Aug 1, 7:34*am, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Jul 30, 1:06 pm, *wrote:

- - - Rural Americans deserve choice too.

- - Dave ? Rural ? All Americans Need 'Choice'

- Inside the RF cloud of a big city there is plenty
- of choice. *40 miles away it can be like Siberia.

We call it Sonora, CA . . . {Twain Harte}

Living in the Land of the Blinking Blue Light

beyond the 'rf' fringe ~ RHF

VegasNightOwl wrote:



None of the Public Broadcasting System publications or DVD's are cheap.
Namely to cover publication costs and whatever is left over becomes a
"donation". However, programming as a whole is fairly cheap compared to
commercial broadcasts. That's what I was trying to say.


VegasNightOwl

Most commercial network stuff is sustained by national ads and costs the
stations nothing.

"RHF" wrote in message
...
On Aug 2, 12:28 pm, "VegasNightOwl"
wrote:
"dave" wrote in message

. ..

VegasNightOwl wrote:

I guess the 9 times I copied it wasn't too bad considering it was a car
radio driving home. I'm sure with a better setup, many more could be
copied.

VegasNightOwl

- - It's nothing compared to "Morning Edition" on the FM.
- - Pretty much wall-to-wall from 88.1-91.9

Wondering About Real "Fairness" on the
AM & FM Radio Bands for All . . .
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...49b6e6a8fc8cbb

- Or "All Things Considered" in the afternoon.
- NPR has a very high presence in the
- "educational channels" of the FM band.
- Since it is cheap for the stations to carry them
- and it's a "public service", why not.
-
- VegasNightOwl

VNO,

Cause it is Liberal Progressive Propaganda without
an honest Conservative Voice to bring 'balance' to
the Topics and View Points presented as News and
Information {Liberal Opinion}.

The so-called "Educational Channels" are in-fact
Liberal Progressive Indoctrination Lesions paid for
indirctly by all the US Tax Payers which cheat the
Ring-Wing Conservative US Citizens of an Equal
Voice in what is being presented as the Whole
Truth when selected 'half-truths' are being preached
at NPR Listeners as the only facts worth considering.

end of rant about npr's liberal bias* ~ RHF
* some would even go as far to say that
npr preaches disrespect and 'hate' against
'the-right-wing and conservatives.

On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 02:33:34 -0700, RHF wrote:

On Aug 2, 12:28Â*pm, "VegasNightOwl" wrote:
"dave" wrote in message

. ..

VegasNightOwl wrote:

I guess the 9 times I copied it wasn't too bad considering it was a
car radio driving home. Â*I'm sure with a better setup, many more
could be copied.

VegasNightOwl

- - It's nothing compared to "Morning Edition" on the FM. - - Pretty
much wall-to-wall from 88.1-91.9

Wondering About Real "Fairness" on the AM & FM Radio Bands for All . . .
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...49b6e6a8fc8cbb

- Or "All Things Considered" in the afternoon. -Â*NPR has a very high
presence in the - "educational channels" of the FM band. - Since it is
cheap for the stations to carry them - and it's a "public service", why
not. -
- VegasNightOwl

VNO,

Cause it is Liberal Progressive Propaganda without an honest
Conservative Voice to bring 'balance' to the Topics and View Points
presented as News and Information {Liberal Opinion}.

The so-called "Educational Channels" are in-fact Liberal Progressive
Indoctrination Lesions paid for indirctly by all the US Tax Payers which
cheat the Ring-Wing Conservative US Citizens of an Equal Voice in what
is being presented as the Whole Truth when selected 'half-truths' are
being preached at NPR Listeners as the only facts worth considering.

end of rant about npr's liberal bias* ~ RHF * some would even go as far
to say that npr preaches disrespect and 'hate' against 'the-right-wing
and conservatives.
.
.

NPR is run by rich conservatives and funded by large republican
corporations. Only a small part is public funding. They just don't
follow the Stalin propaganda of faux and limpballs crazy foolish mantra
like you do.

Rupert thanks you for your support

On Aug 3, 4:53*am, Bob Dobbs wrote:
- - RHF wrote:
- - NPR Subsidizing the Liberal Progressive Agenda
- - t the US Tax Payer's Expense ~ RHF

- Money well spent, eh?
- Far better than foolish eternal war craft over oil.
-
- --
-
- Operator Bob
- Echo Charlie 42

Life in the Vacuum of Global Economics . . .
GONE WILD !

On Aug 3, 4:51*am, Bob Dobbs wrote:
RHF wrote:
* some would even go as far to say that
npr preaches disrespect and 'hate' against
'the-right-wing and conservatives.

No preaching needed, the attitudes and practices of those right wing
conservatives earns all the hate and disrespect they get.

--

Operator Bob
Echo Charlie 42

BD Preach That Liberal Hate !
Hate the Right Wing
Hate the Conservatives
Hate the GOP
Hate the Tea Baggers
Just Hate Anyone You Don't Agree With . . .

On Aug 3, 12:47*pm, dave wrote:
VegasNightOwl wrote:

How true. *That's why I never listen to them.

- Obviously. If you did,
- you'd realize what RHF said was bunk.
-*I think you have NPR confused with Pacifica.

Dave one could not 'confuse' NPR with Pacifica

I am NPR and . . .

Dave 'you' are Pacifica . . .

On Aug 3, 12:30*pm, "D. Peter Maus" wrote:
On 8/3/10 13:39 , VegasNightOwl wrote:



*wrote in message
....
On Aug 2, 12:28 pm,
wrote:
*wrote in message

m...

VegasNightOwl wrote:

I guess the 9 times I copied it wasn't too bad considering it was a car
radio driving home. I'm sure with a better setup, many more could be
copied.

VegasNightOwl

- - It's nothing compared to "Morning Edition" on the FM.
- - Pretty much wall-to-wall from 88.1-91.9

Wondering About Real "Fairness" on the
AM& *FM Radio Bands for All . . .
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...49b6e6a8fc8cbb

- Or "All Things Considered" in the afternoon.
- NPR has a very high presence in the
- "educational channels" of the FM band.
- Since it is cheap for the stations to carry them
- and it's a "public service", why not.
-
- VegasNightOwl

VNO,

Cause it is Liberal Progressive Propaganda without
an honest Conservative Voice to bring 'balance' to
the Topics and View Points presented as News and
Information {Liberal Opinion}.

The so-called "Educational Channels" are in-fact
Liberal Progressive Indoctrination Lesions paid for
indirctly by all the US Tax Payers which cheat the
Ring-Wing Conservative US Citizens of an Equal
Voice in what is being presented as the Whole
Truth when selected 'half-truths' are being preached
at NPR Listeners as the only facts worth considering.

end of rant about npr's liberal bias* ~ RHF
* some would even go as far to say that
npr preaches disrespect and 'hate' against
'the-right-wing and conservatives.
* .
* .

How true. *That's why I never listen to them.

-*You can't defeat an opponent in the arena
- of ideas if don't listen to what they're saying.

Now That Is True !

On Aug 3, 12:52*pm, bpnjensen wrote:
- - On Aug 3, 2:33*am, RHF wrote:
- - honest Conservative Voice

- In this day and age, an oxymoron.

As 'i' say : It Goes To Bias . . .