On 30-Oct-2010, "Chas. Chan" wrote:

Most elections are about particular policies, particular scandals or
particular personalities. But these issues don't mean as much this
year-- not because they are not important, but because this election
is a crossroads election, one that can decide what path this country
will take for many years to come.

There isn't a friggin chance that a small percentage change in the scum in
office can or will change anything. The slime you vote for don't rule your
lives; you do. Possibly even up to 20% of the population does and can
control the direction of the country you live in. The other 80% are
parasites. The 20% have 1) escaped to a more functional country, or,
waddled off to vote, which accomplishes the same thing as turning your
underwear inside out.

November 2 only changes who is shoving the pipe up your ass. You've seen
this same phenomenon all your lives - what changes? The initial after the
bloodsucker's name, the percentage of your money that is confiscated, and an
ongoing lowering of your living standard.

If the toilette is completely flushed and replaced with people with no R or
D behind their names, there is a small chance the US can be fixed. As it
stands, the core economic base is gone, is not returning, and the
population, becoming predominantly 3rd world, will simply elect the
criminals that promise the most handouts.

"Colonel Kurtz" wrote in message
...

On 30-Oct-2010, "Chas. Chan" wrote:

Most elections are about particular policies, particular scandals or
particular personalities. But these issues don't mean as much this
year-- not because they are not important, but because this election
is a crossroads election, one that can decide what path this country
will take for many years to come.

True.

There isn't a friggin chance that a small percentage change in the scum in
office can or will change anything. The slime you vote for don't rule your
lives; you do. Possibly even up to 20% of the population does and can
control the direction of the country you live in. The other 80% are
parasites. The 20% have 1) escaped to a more functional country, or,
waddled off to vote, which accomplishes the same thing as turning your
underwear inside out.

Single election should not be changing much in a relatively free and
prosperous society. That's what Democrats tried to do, and the likely
Republican sweep is in large part a reaction to that coup attempt. The hope
that it will give birth to a strong political movement for years to come.

November 2 only changes who is shoving the pipe up your ass. You've seen
this same phenomenon all your lives - what changes? The initial after the
bloodsucker's name, the percentage of your money that is confiscated, and
an
ongoing lowering of your living standard.

Can not change that in one election. It requires many years of continuous
struggle.

If the toilette is completely flushed and replaced with people with no R
or
D behind their names, there is a small chance the US can be fixed. As it
stands, the core economic base is gone, is not returning, and the
population, becoming predominantly 3rd world, will simply elect the
criminals that promise the most handouts.

No D and R? Should it be K? :-)
e.

On 31-Oct-2010, "Econotron" wrote:

The 20% have 1) escaped to a more functional country, or,
waddled off to vote, which accomplishes the same thing as turning your
underwear inside out.

Single election should not be changing much in a relatively free and
prosperous society. That's what Democrats tried to do, and the likely
Republican sweep is in large part a reaction to that coup attempt. The
hope
that it will give birth to a strong political movement for years to come.

A small change in the balance changes nothing useful, except for punishment
of the slime currently scamming the sheep, and that's a good thing. Nothing
else will result following the Nov. 2 charade.


November 2 only changes who is shoving the pipe up your ass. You've seen
this same phenomenon all your lives - what changes? The initial after
the
bloodsucker's name, the percentage of your money that is confiscated,
and
an
ongoing lowering of your living standard.

Can not change that in one election. It requires many years of continuous
struggle.

Nothing can change until the behavior of the population changes - what will
bring that about? 1) A very serious, long term depression (nothing to stop
that) or 2) a serious, deep realization that squealing for handouts and the
mental instability that causes the sheep to think their destiny is NOT in
the hands of the DC slimeballs. Option 2 won't happen; option 1 likely will.



If the toilette is completely flushed and replaced with people with no R

or
D behind their names, there is a small chance the US can be fixed. As it
stands, the core economic base is gone, is not returning, and the
population, becoming predominantly 3rd world, will simply elect the
criminals that promise the most handouts.

No D and R? Should it be K? :-)

It can be anything or nothing - R vs D is not the solution, it is probably
the number one mental affliction that caused the demise in the first place.

On 31-Oct-2010, dave wrote:

Nothing can change until the behavior of the population changes - what
will
bring that about? 1) A very serious, long term depression (nothing to
stop
that) or 2) a serious, deep realization that squealing for handouts and
the
mental instability that causes the sheep to think their destiny is NOT
in
the hands of the DC slimeballs. Option 2 won't happen; option 1 likely
will.

How about Miami Beach under water? Tornadoes in Alaska? Dengue fever in
New York City? New killer strains of Malaria?

That's 3rd world - yeah, those will work.

On 10/31/2010 3:52 PM, dave wrote:
Econotron wrote:

Single election should not be changing much in a relatively free and
prosperous society. That's what Democrats tried to do, and the likely
Republican sweep is in large part a reaction to that coup attempt. The
hope that it will give birth to a strong political movement for years to
come.

A bowel movement perhaps. The Tea Party was nothing but a collection of
useful idiots who helped the real "elite snobs" get back a little power.
They have served their purpose and I'm sure Mr. Boehner thanks them.


He is next to push out as is being done to Harry Reid....

Econotron wrote:

Single election should not be changing much in a relatively free and
prosperous society. That's what Democrats tried to do, and the likely
Republican sweep is in large part a reaction to that coup attempt. The
hope that it will give birth to a strong political movement for years to
come.

A bowel movement perhaps. The Tea Party was nothing but a collection of
useful idiots who helped the real "elite snobs" get back a little power.
They have served their purpose and I'm sure Mr. Boehner thanks them.

Colonel Kurtz wrote:


Nothing can change until the behavior of the population changes - what will
bring that about? 1) A very serious, long term depression (nothing to stop
that) or 2) a serious, deep realization that squealing for handouts and the
mental instability that causes the sheep to think their destiny is NOT in
the hands of the DC slimeballs. Option 2 won't happen; option 1 likely will.

How about Miami Beach under water? Tornadoes in Alaska? Dengue fever in
New York City? New killer strains of Malaria?