Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
State adviser, Marxist also want more FCC control of airwaves
“Net neutrality” rules must be implemented while the government should quintuple federal funding for public and community broadcasting, argued Ben Scott, the State Department’s recently appointed policy adviser for innovation. http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/Ben_Scott Scott was writing last year in a radical magazine in an article co- authored by Robert W. McChesney (left), an avowed Marxist activist who has called for the dismantlement, “brick-by-brick,” of the U.S. capitalist system, with America being rebuilt as a socialist society. http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2227 http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/Robert_McChesney McChesney is the founder of the George Soros-funded Free Press, which petitions for more government control of the Internet and news media. http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/g...asp?grpid=7103 http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/Free_Press Scott and McChesney also recommended the U.S. impose ownership limits on local radio, TV, and cable channels while pushing for more control of the media by the FCC. The duo were writing in the January/February 2009 edition of Tikkun Magazine, run by avowed Marxist Michael Lerner. http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i....asp?indid=632 http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/Michael_Lerner Lerner has been accused of using the magazine to justify Palestinian terror and has written articles in which he suggested the 9/11 attacks were a response to U.S. policies. “Whatever issue tops your list of priorities, real progress will be impossible unless we first change our media system,” wrote Scott and McChesney. “Currently, access to communications and control over media content are vested in the hands of corporate titans.” The two recommended the following policy implementations: * Restore the original mission of the Federal Communications Commission as a guardian of the public interest. The FCC must become a twenty-first-century agency focused on the digital media marketplace of ideas and commerce, with a commitment to public engagement, transparency, and accountability. * Support ownership limits and public oversight to foster more diverse, competitive, and local ownership of radio, TV, and cable channels. * At a minimum, quintuple the federal funding for public and community broadcasting, to at least $3 billion annually-earmarking money for children’s and public affairs programming. Funding should come from fees paid by commercial licensees to the public airwaves. * Ban all advertising on broadcast and cable TV programs where over 33 percent of the viewership is under the age of twelve. This is similar to the rules in many European nations. * Establish “Network Neutrality” rules that guarantee free speech and a free market on the Internet by prohibiting discrimination, manipulation, and interference by network owners like Comcast or AT&T. * Restore competition to the market in high-speed internet access to break the hold of the cable-telephone duopoly on the nation’s “broadband” infrastructure. * Transition all public subsidies for telephone networks to fund infrastructure to bring the benefits of broadband to all Americans. * Authorize the license of more noncommercial, low-power FM radio stations in communities nationwide. * Open antitrust investigations into vertically integrated media companies that control production and distribution through anti- competitive practices. “Net neutrality” refers to government interference to propose a principle for users’ access to networks participating in the Internet. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nnyK_uMhpk The principle states that if a given user pays for a certain level of Internet access, and another user pays for the same level of access, then the two users should be able to connect to each other at the subscribed level of access. Just last week, FCC Commissioners voted 3-2 to approve controversial “net neutrality” rules, with the content of those rules, about 100 pages, still being rolled out. This past May, Scott was named a policy adviser for innovation at the State Department. He previously served as director of McChesney’s Free Press. Scott authored a book, “The Future of Media,” which was edited by McChesney, who doubles as a professor at the University of Illinois and is former editor of the Marxist journal Monthly Review. http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/g...asp?grpid=7105 http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/Monthly_Review In February 2009, McChesney wrote in a column, “In the end, there is no real answer but to remove brick-by-brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles.” The board of Free Press has included a slew of radicals, such as Obama’s former “green jobs” czar Van Jones, who resigned after it was exposed he founded a communist organization. http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2406 http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/Van_Jones In May, WND reported Free Press published a study advocating the development of a “world class” government-run media system in the U.S. Now the group is pushing a new organization, StopBigMedia.com, that advocates the downfall of “big media” and the creation of new media to “promote local ownership, amplify minority voices, support quality journalism, and bring local artists, voices and viewpoints to the airwaves.” Free Press has ties to other members of the Obama administration. Obama’s “Internet czar,” Susan P. Crawford, spoke at a Free Press’s May 14, 2009, “Changing Media” summit in Washington, D.C. Crawford’s pet project, OneWebNow, lists as “participating organizations” Free Press and the controversial Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN. http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/g...asp?grpid=6968 http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/ACORN Crawford and Kevin Werbach, who co-directed the Obama transition team’s Federal Communications Commission Review team, are advisory board members at Public Knowledge, a George Soros-funded public interest group. http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i....asp?indid=977 A Public Knowledge advisory board member is Timothy Wu, who is also chairman of the board for Free Press. Like Public Knowledge, Free Press also has received funds from Soros’ Open Society Institute. http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/v...ory.asp?id=589 http://therealbarackobama.wordpress....l-of-airwaves/ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NØ ØbaMaØ" wrote in message ... State adviser, Marxist also want more FCC control of airwaves Marxist GOP wants our money. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 30, 4:24Â*pm, N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote: State adviser, Marxist also want more FCC control of airwaves Does it ever occurs to these yahoos that in two years we're going to have another President, and she'll be able to control what gets on the air? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 30, 5:32Â*pm, Sheldon Cooper wrote:
On Dec 30, 4:24Â*pm, N∅ ∅baMa∅ wrote: - - State adviser, Marxist also want more FCC control of airwaves That's Just More Ever Increasing Obama-Ganda© ! Lets All Start by Praising The Great and Super Wonderful President Barack 'Hussein' Obama : * Concentrate on your Obama-Think© * Practice your Obama-Speak© * Joyfully Sing "Living in Obama-Merica"© ! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHqUipinDyw |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just now caught Chainsaw Lawnmower oil drain Plug again.I was bringing
doggy back in the house.Chansaw Plug was pulling into his driveway over there.I grabbed my Duck Call,,,,,, cuhulin |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/30/2010 05:32 PM, Sheldon Cooper wrote:
On Dec 30, 4:24 pm, N∅ wrote: State adviser, Marxist also want more FCC control of airwaves Does it ever occurs to these yahoos that in two years we're going to have another President, and she'll be able to control what gets on the air? Mrs. Sec'y Clinton isn't running until 2016. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Your idea of "fairness" and "justice" is to IMPOSE YOUR idea of "fairness" and "justice" by way of Liberal fascist government control instead of the populace choosing what they wish to watch or listen via the free and unfettered marketplace. Do what you want on cable or satellite. The PUBLIC AIRWAVES belong to everyone and it is ANTI-AMERICAN to allow them to be dominated by one point of view. To me, The Glenn Beck radio program is the equivalent of someone letting their Great Dane dog take a big **** in the middle of the sidewalk. The Public Airwaves should serve everyone with accurate news, balanced opinion, and culturally significant entertainment. Not a lowest common denominator assault on the intellect of the People. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 31 2010, 2:41Â*am, Christopher Helms
wrote: On Dec 30, 7:32Â*pm, Sheldon Cooper wrote: On Dec 30, 4:24Â*pm, N∅ ∅baMa∅ wrote: State adviser, Marxist also want more FCC control of airwaves Does it ever occurs to these yahoos that in two years we're going to have another President, and she'll be able to control what gets on the air? No president has ever been able to "control" what gets on the air. Despite being a Fascist, Marxist, Maoist, Hitler worshipping supposed "ultra leftist," the current one can't even prevent moneyed interests from buying control of the public airwaves until the screaming, fanatical, right wing voice is pretty much the only one anybody is allowed to hear. Although he wanted to bomb Al Jazeera, the previous president probably never felt much desire to control what got on the air, since he got an uninterrupted eight year rim job from the "liberal media" which allegedly hated him, but did an incredible job of completely hiding it. It is completely unacceptable to conservatives to have their government telling them via something like The Fairness Doctrine that they must allow dissenting voices on the public airwaves. It is not only acceptable but desirable to conservatives to tell the public what the public thinks by using money to smash dissenting voices to smithereens like Wal Mart smashes local grocery store chains. Your idea of "fairness" and "justice" is to IMPOSE YOUR idea of "fairness" and "justice" by way of Liberal fascist government control instead of the populace choosing what they wish to watch or listen via the free and unfettered marketplace. They tried your idea in the USSR while it still exists in that model Utopia of N.Korea and Communist China to mention a few. Yeap! It works great when you are a Liberal Fascist dictator - Heil Hitler! Once the likes of you have control we will all be singing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9L3h8bMdlD8 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keeping Up Apearances.Onslow says to Richard, What would you do if in
the middle of the night you felt a friendly arm around you? Richard said, I would get straight up! I would know I am in the wrong bed! cuhulin |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|