On 1/18/2011 8:58 PM, Karl Mauritania wrote:

...
No law broken here, k00k.

Karl Knows


You crud. Go hang out with your fellow criminals.

JS

On 1/18/2011 9:02 PM, Karl Mauritania wrote:


Hiding?

Karl Knows



Yeah. I'll just bet. Slanderous criminals do that, yanno'? They go
into hiding and deny their crimes ...

JS

John Smith wrote:

On 1/18/2011 9:02 PM, Karl Mauritania wrote:


Hiding?

Karl Knows



Yeah. I'll just bet. Slanderous criminals do that, yanno'? They go
into hiding and deny their crimes ...

If I was 'hiding' then why would I be here, you mentally ill k00k?

Karl wants to Know

On 1/18/2011 9:28 PM, Karl Mauritania wrote:

...
Yeah. I'll just bet. Slanderous criminals do that, yanno'? They go
into hiding and deny their crimes ...

If I was 'hiding' then why would I be here, you mentally ill k00k?

Karl wants to Know



I always knew you were crap with no respect for yourself or the law ...
we certainly have that documented here ... I hope you get sued to hell
and back ...

Regards,
JS

John Smith wrote:

On 1/18/2011 9:28 PM, Karl Mauritania wrote:

...
Yeah. I'll just bet. Slanderous criminals do that, yanno'? They go
into hiding and deny their crimes ...

If I was 'hiding' then why would I be here, you mentally ill k00k?

Karl wants to Know



I always knew you were crap with no respect for yourself or the law ...
we certainly have that documented here ... I hope you get sued to hell
and back ...

You don't know jack, 'tard boy.

Sued? For what?

Give us your best legal theory for me being sued, boy, as I'd love to hear it.

Karl Knows

On 1/18/2011 9:33 PM, Karl Mauritania wrote:


You don't know jack, 'tard boy.

Sued? For what?

Give us your best legal theory for me being sued, boy, as I'd love to hear it.

Karl Knows


Yeah, I expected that too. Too stupid to understand what you read. You
are a sorry sack of **** ... sad, so very, very sad ...

JS

John Smith wrote:

On 1/18/2011 9:33 PM, Karl Mauritania wrote:


You don't know jack, 'tard boy.

Sued? For what?

Give us your best legal theory for me being sued, boy, as I'd love to hear it.

Yeah, I expected that too. Too stupid to understand what you read. You
are a sorry sack of **** ... sad, so very, very sad ...

What is sad is that you have no legal theory as to why I might be sued, klown 'tard.

Karl Knows Klown 'Tards

On 1/18/2011 9:44 PM, John Smith wrote:

...

If only your ability to respond to posts could lessen your crime or make
you more than the pile of crap you are ... you would be getting
somewhere ... ROFLOL

JS

On 1/18/2011 9:49 PM, Karl Mauritania wrote:

...
What is sad is that you have no legal theory as to why I might be sued, klown 'tard.

Karl Knows Klown 'Tards



It is sad you think your words will change the crap you are ... sad, so
very, very sad ...

JS

John Smith wrote:

On 1/18/2011 9:44 PM, John Smith wrote:

...

If only your ability to respond to posts could lessen your crime or make
you more than the pile of crap you are ... you would be getting
somewhere ... ROFLOL

Crime? You still havn't explained what my crime is/was and the legal theory
behind it, klown 'tard.

I've already gotten somewhere, boy, and it's certainly miles ahead of you.

Karl Knows