Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/22/2011 11:01 AM, Davej wrote:
... You could be right that some form of paper ballot is superior to the potential troubles of electronic devices, but even paper ballots are now read and tabulated by electronic devices, so the potential for paranoia or actual fraud is not eliminated. I am only familiar with what happened in the past ... a recount of votes always meant bringing a lot of temp help to hand count the votes. Obviously, a recount done by computers is no better than the fraud available by electronic voting machines ... as always, if the people don't demand protections and make sure they are protected from criminals, the criminals will be there ... Regards, JS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Former ACORN Staffer Testifies Under Oath | Shortwave | |||
(OT) : 2008 Election Politics - Count Every Public Open Election Vote : Say No to RHF the news group retard | Shortwave | |||
The K1MAN Sacred Siegfried Oath | General | |||
The K1MAN Sacred Siegfried Oath | Policy | |||
A Soldier discusses his oath | Shortwave |