On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:

* US * wrote:

On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:

The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse

When demolished ...

That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.

The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.

Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.

I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?

Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!

Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes out of all them!

On May 7, 8:43*pm, "Scout"
wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message

...





On May 6, 2:14 pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:

* US * wrote:

On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:

The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building
undergoing
a collapse

When demolished ...

That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.

The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were
left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.

Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.

I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?

Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

One plane load of diesel fuel could not have been enough to get all
the verticle support columns to give away simultaneously through out
the buildi to create a verticl collapse in the buildings footprints!

Really? Collapse into the building's footprint you say?

http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...collapse2a.jpg

I don't think so.

Once you have any idea of the facts, then maybe you can try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!

On May 7, 10:43*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/7/2011 7:20 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1963 it a wonder
they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes
out on them!

Hey, DUDE!

That is spelled dud (duds), no offense meant ... but, a bunch of dudes
hanging around in the walls, since 1963, would make for an interesting
discussion also ... *:-)

Regards,
JS

When did jimmy hoffa come up missing?

On 5/7/2011 7:50 PM, joeturn wrote:
On May 7, 10:43 pm, John wrote:
On 5/7/2011 7:20 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1963 it a wonder
they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes
out on them!

Hey, DUDE!

That is spelled dud (duds), no offense meant ... but, a bunch of dudes
hanging around in the walls, since 1963, would make for an interesting
discussion also ... :-)

Regards,
JS

When did jimmy hoffa come up missing?

The union president of the Teamsters who they dissolved in sulfuric acid
and flushed down a drain?

" ... disappeared at, or sometime after, 2:45 pm on July 30, 1975, ..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Hoffa

Regards,
JS

On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!



DUDE!

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One - Tenants
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p1.html

Part Two - Security
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p2.html

Part Three - Convergence
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/c...lliburton.html

Part Four - Cleanup
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

http://www.devilfinder.com/find.php?...sama+Bin+Laden

Dig him up and bury him again.
cuhulin

On May 7, 9:14*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!

DUDE!

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade

No they weren't. FACT. In any case, no explosives went off. FACT. Your
theory is utter disproven 100% bull****, disproven on its face.

http://www.devilfinder.com/find.php?...ory+Crum bles

Let those MOFOS SCRAMBLE! There isn't Any damn thing they (''they'',
Ministry of Propaganda) can say that will 'Take'.
Damage Control!

AFVN (Armed Forces Vietnam Network) Weather Girl.
http://www.tsna.org
cuhulin

On May 7, 11:14*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!

DUDE!

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One - Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1..html

Part Two - Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html

Part Three - Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_halliburton...

Part Four - Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe the
detonaters were conected during that time!

Just like the man says at 6:00 into this video ."He was there when it
happened and I guess he ought to know"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV1mB...layer_embedded

"joeturn" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 11:14 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote:

...
Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their
construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed
sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them!

Thanks to John Smith the spell checker!

DUDE!

They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security
was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ...

Part One -
Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html

Part Two -
Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html

Part Three -
Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_halliburton...

Part Four -
Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html

Regards,
JS

No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe the
detonaters were conected during that time!

Then clearly the building plans, contract documents, inspectors, and so on
would know ALL about them, right?

Interesting that absolutely NO ONE recalls such devices, no plans exist of
their inclusion in the building, nor the fact that no other building build
during this time has been shown to include such devices in their
construction.

Really, you need to talk to someone, your mental health is seriously in
doubt.