Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/05/2011 6:24 PM, Scout wrote:
"joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 11:14 pm, John Smith wrote: On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote: ... Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them! Thanks to John Smith the spell checker! DUDE! They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ... Part One - Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html Part Two - Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html Part Three - Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_halliburton... Part Four - Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html Regards, JS No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe the detonaters were conected during that time! Then clearly the building plans, contract documents, inspectors, and so on would know ALL about them, right? Interesting that absolutely NO ONE recalls such devices, no plans exist of their inclusion in the building, nor the fact that no other building build during this time has been shown to include such devices in their construction. Really, you need to talk to someone, your mental health is seriously in doubt. Well, the reality is that his mental health or, more correctly, his lack of mental health has never been in doubt. His scribblings are quite effective in removing all doubt Krypsis |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/7/2011 10:20 PM, joeturn wrote:
Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1963 it a wonder they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes out on them! "gavanic"? Do you mean "galvanic"? "Dudes"? Do you mean "duds"? Sorry dude, your [lack of] education is showing. |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 05/08/2011 02:17 AM, RHF wrote:
The 'Liberal' Radio Talk Show Host "Mike Malloy" Called for the US Navy Seals to "Take Bush Out" http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...ge_bu sh.html If we can use Navy SEALs to execute one guy for war crimes, why not another? |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dave wrote: On 05/08/2011 02:17 AM, RHF wrote: The 'Liberal' Radio Talk Show Host "Mike Malloy" Called for the US Navy Seals to "Take Bush Out" http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...ge_bu sh.html If we can use Navy SEALs to execute one guy for war crimes, why not another? Do ya think your pal Obama should be afraid? After all, he sure looked scared in that Situation Room photo. He was the smallest guy in the room and even Hillary was bigger than that runt. |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is all so 'Fuzzy',,, Fuzzy St.John (old Cowboy movie actor) would
say, What the Hell!?! cuhulin |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 6:08*am, * US * wrote:
On Sat, 07 May 2011 20:14:10 -0700, John Smith wrote: They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ... Part One - Tenants http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p1.html Part Two - Security http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p2.html Part Three - Convergence http://911review.com/articles/ryan/c...ic_halliburton... Part Four - Cleanup http://911review.com/articles/ryan/d...access_p4.html Regards, JS Excellent presentation of facts. Not one contradictory fact has been presented. Not one SUPPORTING fact has been presented, you Bush-loving defender of the right. |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 4:24*am, "Scout"
wrote: "joeturn" wrote in message ... On May 7, 11:14 pm, John Smith wrote: On 5/7/2011 7:46 PM, joeturn wrote: ... Well just think they were put in the buildings in durring their construction from 1966 through 1973 it's a wonder they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made duds out of all them! Thanks to John Smith the spell checker! DUDE! They were dropped in during the computer/network upgrade ... security was lax, varoious employees remarked on this ... Part One - Tenantshttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p1.html Part Two - Securityhttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p2.html Part Three - Convergencehttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/carlyle_kissinger_saic_halliburton... Part Four - Cleanuphttp://911review.com/articles/ryan/demolition_access_p4.html Regards, JS No they were put in during construction for quick removal,maybe the detonaters were conected during that time! Then clearly the building plans, contract documents, inspectors, and so on would know ALL about them, right? Lofferley did not know and he was involved. Interesting that absolutely NO ONE recalls such devices, no plans exist of their inclusion in the building, nor the fact that no other building build during this time has been shown to include such devices in their construction. People would think the built in explosives could accidentally be set off and would not go into an astablishment loaded with preset demolictions .Would you? Really, you need to talk to someone, your mental health is seriously in doubt This type of projected thoiught is part of your programming,you have been brainwashed by your controling elite you are a mear slave that they take humor in watching try to explain away reality ..- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 8, 9:05*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 5/7/2011 10:20 PM, joeturn wrote: Well just think they were put in the buildings in 1963 it a wonder they all followed sequence the gavanic corrosion could have made dudes out on them! "gavanic"? Do you mean "galvanic"? "Dudes"? Do you mean "duds"? Sorry dude, your [lack of] education is showing. Schools only teach people a specific path to follow and that path is directed by the CIA/illuminati.Schools teach its pupils to have grammer hang-ups and instead of understanding what is being said they are programed to look for edicate.This type of programming has been successful for the controling elite for ages. |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911? | Shortwave | |||
Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911? | Shortwave |